The experiment was conducted by the radical collapse of thick-walled cylinders. Optical microscopic examination showed that sample (
= 7.3 × 104 s−1, εef = 0.45) failed to produce adiabatic shear bands (ASBs), while ASBs were obtained in samples (
= 1.48 × 105 s−1, εef = 0.86;
= 1.18 × 105 s−1, εef = 0.81), which shows that the energy barrier in shear band formation was decreased with the increase of shear strain rate. With the increase of strain rate, the number of ASBs decreased and the spacing and the average length increased, and the propagation rate of ASBs increased from 213 m s−1 (
= 1.18 × 105 s−1) to 417 m s−1 (
= 1.48 × 105 s−1).
RobinsonJHNolenAM.An investigation of metal matrix composites as shields for hypervelocity orbital debris impacts. Int J Impact Eng. 1995; 17(4):685–696. doi: 10.1016/0734-743X(95)99891-T
2.
MeyersMA.Dynamic behavior of materials. Exp Mech. 2012; 52(2):117–118. doi: 10.1007/s11340-012-9598-0
3.
YangYWangBF.Dynamic recrystallization in adiabatic shear band in α-titanium. Mater Lett. 2006; 60(17):2198–2202. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.12.097
4.
JiangLHYangYWangZMicrostructure evolution within adiabatic shear band in peak aged ZK60 magnesium alloy. Mat Sci Eng A Struct. 2018; 711:317–324. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.10.111
5.
YangYJiangFZhouBMMicrostructural characterization and evolution mechanism of adiabatic shear band in a near beta-Ti alloy. Mat Sci Eng A Struct. 2011; 528(6):2787–2794. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.053
6.
YangYJiangLHXuZAn examination of adiabatic shearing behavior in ZK60 alloy with different states of heat treatment. Mat Sci Eng A Struct. 2017; 685:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.12.117
7.
YangYJiangLH.Effect of heat treatment on adiabatic shear susceptibility in ZK60 magnesium alloy. Mat Sci Eng A Struct. 2016; 664:146–154. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.04.002
8.
YangYJiangLH.Self-organization of adiabatic shear bands in ZK60 magnesium alloy. Mat Sci Eng A Struct. 2016; 655:321–330. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.01.008
9.
YangYLiXMChenSWEffects of pre-notches on the self-organization behaviors of shear bands in aluminum alloy. Mat Sci Eng A Struct. 2010; 527(20):5084–5091. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.04.079
10.
YangYTanGYChenPXEffects of different aging statuses and strain rate on the adiabatic shear susceptibility of 2195 aluminum-lithium alloy. Mat Sci Eng A Struct. 2012; 546(1):279–283. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.03.067
11.
YangYZhengHGZhaoZDEffect of phase composition on self-organization of shear bands in Ti-1300 titanium alloy. Mat Sci Eng A Struct. 2011; 528(25):7506–7513. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.06.068
12.
YangYZhengHGShiZJEffect of orientation on self-organization of shear bands in 7075 aluminum alloy. Mat Sci Eng A Struct. 2011; 528(6):2446–2453. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.050
13.
XueQMeyersMANesterenkoVF.Self organization of shear bands in stainless steel. Mat Sci Eng A Struct. 2004; 384:35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.05.069
14.
XueQNesterenkoVFMeyersMA.Evaluation of the collapsing thick-walled cylinder technique for shear-band spacing. Int J Impact Eng. 2003; 28(3):257–280. doi: 10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00103-3
15.
YangYJiangLHLuoSHEffect of strain on microstructure evolution of 1Cr18Ni9Ti stainless steel during adiabatic shearing. J Mater Eng Perform. 2016; 25:29–37. doi: 10.1007/s11665-015-1776-7
16.
WranglénG.An introduction to corrosion and protection of metals; 1985.
17.
PedroFNPo-HsunCDavidJBCavity collapse in highly heterogeneous granular mixtures with different grain size and porosity. J Appl Phys. 2019; 126:024303. doi: 10.1063/1.5099142
18.
MeyersMAWangSL.An improved method for shock consolidation of powders. Acta Metall Mater. 1998; 36:925–936. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(88)90147-2
19.
KennedyJE.Behavior and utilization of explosives in engineering design. 12th annual symposium; Albuquerque, NM; 1972. ASME.
NavarroPFPo-HsunCHigginsAShear band patterning and post-critical behavior in AISI 4340 steel with different microstructure. Int J Impact Eng. 2018; 112:144–154. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.10.011
22.
GradyDEKippME.The growth of unstable thermoplastic shear with application to steady-wave shock compression in solids. J Mech Phys Solids. 1987; 35(1):95–119. doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(87)90030-5
23.
WrightTWOckendonH.A scaling law for the effect of inertia on the formation of adiabatic shear bands. Int J Plasticity. 1996; 12(7):927–934. doi: 10.1016/S0749-6419(96)00034-4
24.
MolinariA.Collective behavior and spacing of adiabatic shear bands. J Mech Phys Solids. 1997; 45(9):1551–1575. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00012-4
25.
XueQMeyersMANesterenkoVF.Self-organization of shear bands in titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Acta Mater. 2002; 50:575–596. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00356-1
26.
MercierSMolinariA.Steady-state shear band propagation under dynamic conditions. J Mech Phys Solids. 1998; 46:1463–1495. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00069-0
27.
OdeshiAGAl-AmeeriSMirfakhraeiSDeformation and failure mechanism in AISI 4340 steel under ballistic impact. Theor Appl Fract Mec. 2006; 45(1):18–24. doi: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2005.11.005
= 7.3 × 104 s−1, εef = 0.45) failed to produce adiabatic shear bands (ASBs), while ASBs were obtained in samples (
= 1.48 × 105 s−1,
= 1.18 × 105 s−1, εef = 0.81), which shows that the energy barrier in shear band formation was decreased with the increase of shear strain rate. With the increase of strain rate, the number of ASBs decreased and the spacing and the average length increased, and the propagation rate of ASBs increased from 213 m s−1 (
= 1.18 × 105 s−1) to 417 m s−1 (
= 1.48 × 105 s−1).