The temperature field, flow field and solidification structure of Ag–28Cu–2Ge–0.4Co alloy during solidification under water cooling, air cooling and slow cooling conditions were investigated, respectively. The results indicate that the temperature distribution is the most uniform and the solid–liquid phase region is the widest under slow cooling condition. The temperature gradient at the solidification front is the largest under water cooling condition. The solidification rate increases with the distance away from the sidewall under three cooling conditions. Under water-cooled conditions, the liquid flow at the front of the liquidus is much smaller than that in the other two conditions. The ratio of equiaxed crystals and columnar crystals in the solidified structure is different under different cooling conditions.
CarozzaniTDigonnetHGandinCA.3D CAFE modeling of grain structures: application to primary dendritic and secondary eutectic solidification. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2012; 20(1):015010. doi:10.1088/0965-0393/20/1/015010.
2.
VutovaKKolevaEMladenovG.The role of ingot–crucible thermal contact in mathematical modelling of the heat transfer during electron beam melting. Vacuum. 2001; 62(2–3):189–196. doi:10.1016/s0042-207x(00)00437-1.
3.
ZhanXHWeiYHDongZB.Cellular automaton simulation of grain growth with different orientation angles during solidification process. J Mater Process Technol. 2008; 208(3):1–8. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.130.
4.
ZhangYJKouHCLiPFSimulation on solidification structure and shrinkage porosity(hole) in TC4 ingot during vacuum arc remelting process. Special Cast Nonferrous Alloys. 2012; 5(32):418–421.
5.
XiaYJWangFMLiCRSimulation of thermomechanical behavior during continuous casting process based on MiLE method. J Central South Univ. 2012; 9(19):2403–2410. doi:10.1007/s11771-012-1288-7.
6.
KouHCZhangYJLiPFNumerical simulation of titanium alloy ingot solidification structure during VAR process based on three-dimensional CAFE method. Rare Met Mater Eng. 2014; 7(43):1537–1542. doi: 10.1016/S1875-5372(14)60120-X
7.
WuSPLiuDRGuoJJNumerical simulation of microstructure evolution of Ti-6Al-4V alloy in vertical centrifugal casting. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006; 1(2):240–249.
8.
ZaeemMAYinHFelicelliSD.Comparison of cellular automaton and phase field models to simulate dendrite growth in hexagonal crystals. J Mater Sci Technol. 2012; 28(2):137–146. doi:10.1016/s1005-0302(12)60034-6.
9.
Zaeem MAYinHFelicelli SD.Modeling dendritic solidification of Al-3%Cu using cellular automaton and phase-field methods. Appl Math Model. 2013; 37(5):3495–3503. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2012.08.005.
10.
GandinCARappazMTintillierR.Three-dimensional probabilistic simulation of solidification grain structures: application to superalloy precision castings. Metall Mater Trans A. 1993; 24(2):467–479. doi:10.1007/bf02657334.
11.
GandinCARappazM.A coupled finite element-cellular automaton model for the prediction of dendritic grain structures in solidification processes. Acta Metall Mater. 1994; 7(42):2233–2246. doi:10.1016/0956-7151(94)90302-6.
12.
WangJLWangFMZhaoYYNumerical simulation of 3D-microstructures in solidification processes based on the CAFE method. Int J Min Met Mater. 2009; 16(6):640–645.
13.
ParkEMSongGALeeJKEffect of solubility on strengthening of Ag-Cu ultrafine eutectic composites. J Alloys Compd. 2011; 509(37):9015–9018. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.06.021.
14.
ZhaoSJfLLiuLEutectic growth from cellular to dendritic form in the undercooled Ag-Cu eutectic alloy melt. J Cryst Growth. 2009; 311(5):1387–1391. doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.12.006.
15.
CagranCWilthanBPottlacherG.Enthalpy, heat of fusion and specific electrical resistivity of pure silver, pure copper and the binary Ag-28Cu alloy. Thermochim Acta. 2006; 445(2):104–110. doi:10.1016/j.tca.2005.08.014.
16.
McFaddenSBrowneDJ.A front-tracking model to predict solidification macrostructures and columnar to equiaxed transitions in alloy castings. Appl Math Model. 2009; 33(3):1397–1416. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2008.01.027.
17.
ZuoYBCuiJZZhaoZHEffects of refiner and cooling rate on microstructure of an Al-Mg-Mn alloy. Rare Met. 2008; 32(05):589–592.
18.
ZhuMFLeeSYHongCP.Modified cellular automaton model for the prediction of dendritic growth with melt convection. Phys Rev E. 2004; 69(6):061610. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.69.061610.
19.
ZhuMFKimJMHongCP.Modeling of globular and dendritic structure evolution in solidification of an Al-7wt%Si alloy. ISIJ Int. 2001; 41(9):992–998. doi:10.2355/isijinternational.41.992.
20.
MartoranoMABiscuolaVB.Columnar front tracking algorithm for prediction of the columnar-to-equiaxed transition in two-dimensional solidification. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng. 2006; 14:1225–1243. doi: 10.1088/0965-0393/14/7/010
21.
RappazMGandinCA.Probabilistic modelling of microstructure formation in solidification processes. Acta Metall Mater. 1993; 2(41):345–360. doi:10.1016/0956-7151(93)90065-Z.
22.
GandinCARappazM.A 3D cellular automaton algorithm for the prediction of dendritic grain growth. Acta Mater. 2017; 45(5):2187–2195. doi:10.1016/s1359-6454(96)00303-5.
23.
KurWGiovanolabBTrivediR.Theory of microstructural development during rapid solidification. Acta Metall Mater. 1986; 34:823–830. doi:10.1016/0001-6160(86)90056-8.
24.
LeeHNRyooHS.Monte Carlo simulation of microstructure evolution based on grain boundary character distribution. Mater Sci Eng A. 2000; 1:176–188. doi:10.1016/s0921-5093(99)00725-x.
25.
GrujicicMCaoGFigliolaSR.Computer simulation of the evolution of solidification microstructure in the LENS rapid fabrication process. Appl Surf Sci. 2001; 1(2):43–57. doi:10.1016/S0169-4332(01)00553-0.
26.
YanXFangFZouQ.CA-FE method for solidification simulation of super alloy castings. J Xihua Univ (Nat Sci Ed). 2008; 27(06):6. doi:1673-159X(2008)06-0067-03.
27.
GrujicicMCaoGMillerRS.Computer modeling of the evolution of dendrite microstructure in binary alloys during non-isothermal solidification. J Mater Synth Process. 2002; 10(4):191–203. doi:10.1023/a:1023022214920.
28.
WuSPLiuDRGuoJJModeling of solidification grain structure for Ti-45%Al alloy ingot by cellular automaton. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2005; 15(2):291.
29.
NastacL.Numerical modeling of solidification morphologies and segregation patters in cast dendritic alloys. Acta Mater. 1999; 47(17):4253–4262. doi:10.1016/s1359-6454(99)00325-0.
30.
SpittleJABrownSGR.Computer simulation of the effect of alloy variable on the grain structures of casting. Acta Metall. 1989; 37(7):1803–1810. doi:10.1016/0001-6160(89)90065-5.
31.
GandinCADesbiollesJLRappazMA three-dimensional cellular automation-finite element model for the prediction of solidification grain structures. Metall Mater Trans A. 1999; 30(12):3153–3165. doi:10.1007/s11661-999-0226-2.
32.
DongLNZhangJX.Research status of heterogeneous gradient feature for laser welded joint of Ti6Al4 V alloy. Rare Metal Mater. Eng. 2013; 42(3):655–660.
33.
YangYFXieMChengYResearch status of numerical simulation of solidification microstructure. Mater Rev. 2014; 28(21):24–29.
34.
DexinM.Discussion of “thermal and grain-structure simulation in a Land-based Turbine Blade Directionally solidified with the liquid metal cooling process. Metall Mater Trans A. 2001; 6:1212–1213.
35.
NastacL.A multiscale transient modeling approach for predicting the solidification structure in VAR-processed alloy 718 ingots. Metall Mater Trans B. 2014; 45(1):44–50. doi:10.1007/s11663-012-9715-6.
36.
WangW.Rapid solidification behaviour of Ag-Cu-Ge ternary eutectic alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2001; 307(1):80–90. doi:10.1016/s0921-5093(00)01954-7.
37.
DutkiewiczJMassalskiTB.Search for metallic glasses at eutectic compositions in the Ag-Cu-Ge, Ag-Cu-Sb and Ag-Cu-Sb-Ge systems. Metall Trans A. 1981; 12(5):773–778. doi:10.1007/BF02648341.
