The strength–toughness combination of an ultra-low carbon, low alloyed ‘air-cooled’ steel has been enhanced by developing and refining the granular bainite (GB) structure. Suitable alloy design and thermo-mechanical treatment involving forging, austenitisation (950–1150°C) and air-cooling resulted in the formation of GB matrix along with small islands of martensite–austenite constituents and allotriomorphic ferrite grains. Microstructural characterisation and phase transformation behaviour were studied by scanning electron microscopy and electron backscattered diffraction analysis. The effect of microstructural parameters on the strength-impact toughness combination was investigated. The steel showed an exceptionally low yield ratio, which is beneficial for seismic resistance application.
GarciaCI, LisAK, DeardoAJ., Ultra-low carbon bainitic steel plate steels: processing, microstructure and properties. Iron Steelmaker. 1991;18:97–106.
2.
YangJR, HuangCY, WangSC.The development of ultra-low-carbon bainitic steels. Mater Des. 1992;13:335–338. doi: 10.1016/0261-3069(92)90003-Z
3.
WangSC, YangJR.Effects of chemical composition, rolling and cooling conditions on the amount of martensite/austenite (M/A) constituent formation in low carbon bainitic steels. Mater Sci Eng A. 1992;154:43–49. doi: 10.1016/0921-5093(92)90361-4
4.
WangSC, KaoPW.The effect of alloying elements on the structure and mechanical properties of ultra low carbon bainitic steels. J Mater Sci. 1993;28:5169–5175. doi: 10.1007/BF00570058
5.
LisAK, LisJ, JeziorskiL.Advanced ultra-low carbon bainitic steels with high toughness. J Mater Process Technol. 1997;64:255–266. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(96)02575-7
6.
WeiZL, ZuoLF, MaB, Effect of heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of 800 MPa grade ultra low carbon bainite steel. Adv Mater Res. 2011;415–417:943–946.
7.
JonesBL, JohnsonDL.Proceedings of an International Conference in Steels for Line Pipe Pipeline Fittings. London: The Metals Society; 1981:14.
8.
BannisterAC, TrailSJ.The significance of the yield stress/tensile stress ratio to structural integrity. British Steel Plc., August, 1996.
9.
KimYM, KimSK, LimYJ, Effect of microstructure on the yield ratio and low temperature toughness of linepipe steels. ISIJ Int. 2002;42:1571–1577. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.42.1571
10.
TangZ, StumpfW.The effect of microstructure and processing variables on the yield to ultimate tensile strength ratio in a Nb-Ti and a Nb-Ti-Mo line pipe steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;490:391–402. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.01.060
11.
GuoA, MisraRDK, XuJ, Ultrahigh strength and low yield ratio of niobium-microalloyed 900 MPa pipeline steel with nano/ultrafine bainitic lath. Mater Sci Eng A. 2010;527:3886–3892. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.02.067
12.
WangX, ZhaoH, ShangC, The microstructure and properties of high performance steels with low yield-to-tensile ratio. J Alloys Compd. 2013;577:S678–S683. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.05.129
13.
FanL, ZhouD, WangT, Tensile properties of an acicular ferrite and martensite/austenite constituent steel with varying cooling rates. Mater Sci Eng A. 2014;590:224–231. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2013.10.037
14.
KimYM, LeeH, KimNJ.Transformation behavior and microstructural characteristics of acicular ferrite in linepipe steels. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;478:361–370. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.06.035
15.
AsahiH.Effects of Mo addition and austenitizing temperature on hardenability of low alloy B-added steels. ISIJ Int. 2002;42:1150–1155. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.42.1150
16.
HaraT, AsahiH, UemoriR, Role of combined addition of niobium and boron and of molybdenum and boron on hardnenability in Low carbon steels. ISIJ Int. 2004;44:1431–1440. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.44.1431
17.
ZhuK, OberbilligC, MusikC, Effect of B and B + Nb on the bainitic transformation in low carbon steels. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011;528:4222–4231. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.022
18.
SungHK, ShinSY, HwangB, Effects of B and Cu addition and cooling rate on microstructure and mechanical properties in low-carbon, high-strength bainitic steels. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci. 2012;43:3703–3714. doi: 10.1007/s11661-012-1183-8
19.
TamehiroH, MurataM, HabuR, Effect of combined addition of niobium and boron on thermomechanically processed steel. Tetsu-to-Hagane. 1986;72:458–465. doi: 10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.72.3_458
20.
LeeCS, ChooWY.Effects of austenite conditioning and hardenability on mechanical properties of B-containing high strength steels. ISIJ Int. 2000;40:S189–S193. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.40.Suppl_S189
21.
GhaliSN, El-FaramawyHS, EissaMM.Influence of boron additions on mechanical properties of carbon steel. J. Miner. Mater. Charact. Eng. 2012;11:995–999. http://www.scirp.org/journal/jmmce
22.
LiYJ, PongeD, ChoiP, Segregation of boron at prior austenite grain boundaries in a quenched martensitic steel studied by atom probe tomography. Scr Mater. 2015;96:13–16. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.09.031
23.
CapdevilaC, CaballeroF, de AndrésC.Austenite grain size effects on isothermal allotriomorphic ferrite formation in 0.37 C-1.45 Mn-0.11 V microalloyed steel. Mater Trans. 2003;44:1087–1095. doi: 10.2320/matertrans.44.1087
24.
BaiY, GuoH, YangSW, Influence of austenite grain size on the crystallography of allotriomorphic ferrite in a low carbon steel. Adv Mater Res. 2012;535–537:605–610.
25.
WangXM, HeXL.Effect of boron addition on structure and properties of Low carbon bainitic steels. ISIJ Int. 2002;42:S38–S46. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.42.Suppl_S38
26.
LeeHW, KimYH, LeeSH, Effect of boron contents on weldability in high strength steel. J Mech Sci Technol. 2007;21:771–777. doi: 10.1007/BF02916355
27.
HwangB, SuhDW, KimSJ.Austenitizing temperature and hardenability of low-carbon boron steels. Scr Mater. 2011;64:1118–1120. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.03.003
28.
ShigesatoG, FujishiroT, HaraT.Boron segregation to austenite grain boundary in low alloy steel measured by aberration corrected STEM-EELS. Mater Sci Eng A. 2012;556:358–365. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.06.099
29.
ChakrabartiD, DavisC, StrangwoodM.Characterisation of bimodal grain structures in HSLA steels. Mater Charact. 2007;58:423–438. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2006.06.014
30.
ASTM E8/E8M-09. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials, Annu. B. ASTM stand. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2009.
31.
ASTM E23-09. Standard test method for notched bar impact testing of metallic materials, Annu. B. ASTM stand. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2009.
32.
BorattoF, BarbosaR, YueS, Physical metallurgy of thermomechanical processing of steels and other metals (THERMEC-88). ISIJ. 1988;1:383–390.
33.
SongT, De CoomanBC.Effect of boron on the isothermal bainite transformation. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci. 2013;44:1686–1705. doi: 10.1007/s11661-012-1522-9
34.
SkMB, GhoshA, RarhiN, Effect of reheating temperature and cooling treatment on the microstructure, texture, and impact transition behavior of heat-treated naval grade HSLA steel. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci. 2017;48:3231–3247. doi: 10.1007/s11661-017-4099-5
35.
CaballeroFG, RoelofsH, HaslerS, Influence of bainite morphology on impact toughness of continuously cooled cementite free bainitic steels. Mater Sci Technol. 2012;28:95–102. doi: 10.1179/1743284710Y.0000000047
36.
SakaiY, TamanoiK, OguraN.Application of tanh curve fit analysis to fracture toughness data of Japanese RPVS. Nucl Eng Des. 1989;115:31–39. doi: 10.1016/0029-5493(89)90257-4
37.
BS7910:1999. Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures, UK; 1999. DOI:10.3403/02171541
38.
HuangC, YangJ, WangS.Effect of compressive deformation on the transformation behavior of an ultra-low-carbon bainitic steel. Mater Trans. 1993;34:658–668. Available from: https://www.jim.or.jp/journal/e/pdf3/34/08/658.pdf doi: 10.2320/matertrans1989.34.658
39.
ShipwayPH, BhadeshiaHKDH.The effect of small stresses on the kinetics of the bainite transformation. Mater Sci Eng A. 1995;201:143–149. doi: 10.1016/0921-5093(95)09769-4
40.
American Petroleum Institute. Specification for line pipe. ANSI/API specification 5L. 45th ed.Washington (DC): American Petroleum Institute; 2012.
