The effect of 0, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9 wt-% Y addition on the microstructure and mechanical properties of extruded Mg–4Al–2Sn alloys were investigated. The results show that α-Mg, Mg17Al12, Mg2Sn and Al2Y phases form in the extruded Y-containing alloys. Mg17Al12 phase, containing trace amounts of Y, tends to distribute on the grain boundaries in the form of needles. When the Y content is 0.6 wt-%, the alloy has the best combination mechanical properties. Its tensile yield strength, ultimate tensile strength and tensile elongation are 172 MPa, 270 MPa and 11.2%, respectively. As the Y content increases, the tensile and compressive asymmetries in the Mg–4Al–2Sn–xY alloy decrease, due to grain refinement and the weakening of texture.
JiangMG, XuC, NakataT, Development of dilute Mg–Zn–Ca–Mn alloy with high performance via extrusion. J Alloy Compd. 2016;668:13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.195
2.
XiaoW, JiaS, WangL, Effects of Sn content on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg–7Zn–5Al based alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2010;527(26):7002–7007. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.07.019
3.
ZhengL, NieH, LiangW, Effect of pre-homogenizing treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of hot-rolled AZ91 magnesium alloys. J Magnesium Alloy. 2016;4(2):115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2016.04.002
4.
JandaghiMR, PouraliakbarH, KhalajG, On the effect of non-isothermal annealing and multi-directional forging on the microstructural evolutions and correlated mechanical and electrical characteristics of hot-deformed Al–Mg alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2016;657:431–440. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.01.056
5.
PouraliakbarH, PakbazM, FiroozS, Study on the dynamic and static softening phenomena in Al–6Mg alloy during two-stage deformation through interrupted hot compression test. Measurement. 2016;77:50–53. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.08.033
6.
LeeSI, KimJS, ParkSJ, Evolution of tension and compression asymmetry of extruded Mg–Al–Sn–Zn alloy with respect to forming temperatures. Mater Des. 2016;110:510–518. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.026
7.
ParkSH, JungJG, KimYM, A new high-strength extruded Mg–8Al–4Sn–2Zn alloy. Mater Lett. 2015;139(139):35–38. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.10.033
8.
QuH, LiuWD, ZhouG, Relationship between the valence electron structures of precipitated phases and thermostability of Mg–Al–Si alloy. Adv Mat Res. 2011;183–185:2068–2072. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.183-185.2068
9.
LiZT, ZhangXD, ZhengMY, Effect of Ca/Al ratio on microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg–Al–Ca–Mn alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2016;682:423–432. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.11.026
10.
KavyaniM, EbrahimiGR, SanjariM, Texture evaluation in warm deformation of an extruded Mg–6Al–3Zn alloy. J Magnesium Alloy. 2016;4(2):89–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2016.05.002
11.
ZhangH, LiuY, FanJ, Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of twinned AZ31 alloy plates at lower elevated temperature. J Alloy Compd. 2014;615(9):687–692. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.07.045
12.
GibsonM, FangXY, BettlesC, The effect of precipitate state on the creep performance of Mg–Sn alloys. Scr Mater. 2010;63(8):899–902. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.07.002
13.
HuG, XingB, HuangF, Effect of Y addition on the microstructures and mechanical properties of as-aged Mg–6Zn–1Mn–4Sn (wt%) alloy. J Alloy Compd. 2016;689:326–332. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.06.216
14.
ChangLL, TangH, GuoJ.Strengthening effect of nano and micro-sized precipitates in the hot-extruded Mg–5Sn–3Zn alloys with Ca addition. J Alloy Compd. 2017;703:552–559. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.274
15.
NamND.Corrosion behavior of Mg–5Al based magnesium alloy with 1 wt.% Sn, Mn and Zn additions in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution. J Magnesium Alloy. 2014;2:190–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2014.06.002
16.
ElsayedFR, SasakiTT, OhkuboT, Effect of extrusion conditions on microstructure and mechanical properties of microalloyed Mg–Sn–Al–Zn alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2013;588(24):318–328. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2013.09.050
17.
WangJ, ZhangX, LuX, Microstructure, texture and mechanical properties of hot-rolled Mg–4Al–2Sn–0.5Y–0.4Nd alloy. J Magnesium Alloy. 2016;4(3):207–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2016.07.004
18.
HuY, ZhangC, MengW, Microstructure, mechanical and corrosion properties of Mg–4Al- 2Sn–xY–0.4Mn alloys. J Alloys Compd. 2017;727:491–500. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.171
19.
WangHY, ZhangN, WangC, First-principles study of the generalized stacking fault energy in Mg–3Al–3Sn alloy. Scr Mater. 2011;65(8):723–726. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.07.016
20.
WangH-Y, NanX-L, ZhangN, Strong strain hardening ability in an as-cast Mg–3Al–3Sn alloy. Mater Chem Phys. 2012;132(2–3):248–252. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.12.036
21.
SheJ, PanF, ZhangJ, Microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg–Al–Sn extruded alloys. J Alloys Compd. 2016;657:893–905. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.10.146
JandaghiMR, PouraliakbarH, KhalajG, Study on the post-rolling direction of severely plastic deformed aluminum–manganese–silicon alloy. Arch Civil Mech Eng. 2016;16(4):876–887. doi: 10.1016/j.acme.2016.06.005
24.
PouraliakbarH, JandaghiMR, BaygiSJM, Microanalysis of crystallographic characteristics and structural transformations in SPDed Al, Mn, Si alloy by dual-straining. J Alloys Compd. 2017;696:1189–1198. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.086
25.
YuH, LiC, XinY, The mechanism for the high dependence of the Hall–Petch slope for twinning/slip on texture in Mg alloys. Acta Mater. 2017;128:313–326. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.02.044
26.
YuanW, PanigrahiSK, SuJ-Q, Influence of grain size and texture on Hall–Petch relationship for a magnesium alloy. Scr Mater. 2011;65:994–997. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.08.028
27.
PouraliakbarH, JandaghiMR, KhalajG.Constrained groove pressing and subsequent annealing of Al–Mn–Si alloy: microstructure evolutions, crystallographic transformations, mechanical properties, electrical conductivity and corrosion resistance. Mater Des. 2017;124:34–46. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.053
28.
JandaghiMR, PouraliakbarH.Study on the effect of post-annealing on the microstructural evolutions and mechanical properties of rolled CGPed aluminum–manganese–silicon alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2017;679:493–503. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.10.054
29.
JainJ, PooleWJ, SinclairCW, Reducing the tension–compression yield asymmetry in a Mg–8Al–0.5Zn alloy via precipitation. Scr Mater. 2010;62(5):301–304. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.11.024
30.
LiuQ.Research progress on plastic deformation mechanism of mg alloys. Acta Metall Sin. 2010;46(11):1458–1472. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2010.01458
31.
KimB, BaekSM, HuYJ, Grain refinement and reduced yield asymmetry of extruded Mg–5Sn–1Zn alloy by Al addition. J Alloys Compd. 2016;660:304–309. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.11.133
SadeghiA, ShookS, PekguleryuzM.Yield asymmetry and fracture behavior of Mg–3%Al–1%Zn–(0–1) % Sr alloys extruded at elevated temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011;528(25–26):7529–7536. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.06.060
34.
YinSM, WangCH, DiaoYD, Influence of grain size and texture on the yield asymmetry of Mg–3Al–1Zn alloy. J Mater Sci Tech. 2011;27(1):29–34. doi: 10.1016/S1005-0302(11)60021-2
35.
XuS, LiuT, ChenH, Reducing the tension–compression yield asymmetry in a hot-rolled Mg–3Al–1Zn alloy via multidirectional pre-compression. Mat Sci Eng A Struct Mat Prop Microst Proces. 2013;565(5):96–101. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.11.127
36.
LvC, LiuT, LiuD, Effect of heat treatment on tension–compression yield asymmetry of AZ80 magnesium alloy. Mater Des. 2012;33(1):529–533. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.04.060
37.
ZhangD, WenH, KumarMA, Yield symmetry and reduced strength differential in Mg–2.5Y alloy. Acta Mater. 2016;120:75–85. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.037
38.
SongB, XinRL, SunLY, Influencing factors and controlling methods of tension-compression asymmetry in magnesium alloys. Chinese J Nonferr Metal. 2014;24(8):1941–1952.
39.
RobsonJD, TwierA.M, LorimerGW, Effect of extrusion conditions on microstructure, texture, and yield asymmetry in Mg–6Y–7Gd–0.5 wt% Zr alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011;528(24):7247–7256. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.05.075
