In the present study, an Al-7075 alloy reinforced with 15 wt-% TC4 (Ti–6Al–4V) was synthesised by hot pressing. The results of transmission electron microscopy suggest that a well-bonded multilayer interface was created, and that the multilayer has the ability to limit crack initiation at the interface. Sintering at 913 K for 0.5 h proved to be the most effective procedure for limiting the sources of cracking inside the multilayer interface, resulting in an enhanced tensile strength and a compressive strength for the composite of 454 and 873 MPa, respectively. The desired multilayer structure and the strengthening mechanism are discussed in detail. This structure provides guidance for the development of new methods for fabricating composites with excellent mechanical properties.
GaneshVV, ChawlaN.Effect of particle orientation anisotropy on the tensile behavior of metal matrix composites: experiments and microstructure-based simulation. Mater Sci Eng A. 2005;391(1):342–353. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.017
2.
SunC, ShenR, SongM.Effects of sintering and extrusion on the microstructures and mechanical properties of a SiC/Al-Cu composite. J Mater Eng Perform. 2012;21(3):373–381. doi: 10.1007/s11665-011-9940-1
3.
KwonH, EstiliM, TakagiK, Combination of hot extrusion and spark plasma sintering for producing carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Carbon. 2009;47(3):570–577. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.10.041
4.
TorralbaJM, Da CostaCE, VelascoF.P/M aluminum matrix composites: an overview. J Mater Process Technol. 2003;133(1):203–206. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00234-0
5.
XiongBW, XuZF, YanQS, Effects of SiC volume fraction and aluminum particulate size on interfacial reactions in SiC nanoparticulate reinforced aluminum matrix composites. J Alloys Compd. 2011;509(4):1187–1191. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.09.171
6.
AkbariMK, MirzaeeO, BaharvandiHR.Fabrication and study on mechanical properties and fracture behavior of nanometric Al2O3 particle-reinforced A356 composites focusing on the parameters of vortex method. Mater Des. 2013;46:199–205. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.10.008
7.
ShenQ, WuCD, LuoGQ, Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-7075/B4 C composites fabricated by plasma activated sintering. J Alloys Compd. 2014;588:265–270. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.11.089
8.
WangZW, SongM, SunC, Effects of particle size and distribution on the mechanical properties of SiC reinforced Al–Cu alloy composites. Mater Sci Eng A. 2011;528(3):1131–1137. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.11.028
9.
SongM, HuangD.Experimental and modeling of the coupled influences of variously sized particles on the tensile ductility of SiC p/Al metal matrix composites. Metall Mater Trans A. 2007;38(9):2127–2137. doi: 10.1007/s11661-007-9276-5
10.
PsakhieS, OvcharenkoV, YuBH, Influence of features of interphase boundaries on mechanical properties and fracture pattern in metal–ceramic composites. J Mater Sci Technol. 2013;29(11):1025–1034. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2013.08.002
11.
ShorowordiKM, LaouiT, HaseebASMA, Microstructure and interface characteristics of B4 C, SiC and Al2O3 reinforced Al matrix composites: a comparative study. J Mater Process Technol. 2003;142(3):738–743. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00815-X
12.
KhodabakhshiF, SlimchiA, KokabiAH, Friction stir processing of an aluminum-magnesium alloy with pre-placing elemental titanium powder: In-situ formation of an Al3 Ti-reinforced nanocomposite and materials characterization. Mater Charact. 2015;108:102–114. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2015.08.016
13.
WangYC, SongM, NiS, In situ formed core–shell structured particle reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Mater Des (1980–2015). 2014;56:405–408. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.030
14.
ChianehVA, HosseiniHM, NofarM.Micro structural features and mechanical properties of Al–Al3 Ti composite fabricated by in-situ powder metallurgy route. J Alloys Compd. 2009;473(1):127–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.05.068
15.
SunY, HaleyJ, KurkarmiK, Influence of electric current on microstructure evolution in Ti/Al and Ti/TiAl3 during spark plasma sintering. J Alloys Compd. 2015;648:1097–1103. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.079
16.
LiuYX, ChenWP, YangC, Effects of metallic Ti particles on the aging behavior and the influenced mechanical properties of squeeze-cast (SiC p+ Ti)/7075Al hybrid composites. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015;620:190–197. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.10.017
17.
AfonsoCRM, AleixoGT, RamirezAJ, Influence of cooling rate on microstructure of Ti–Nb alloy for orthopedic implants mater. Sci Eng C. 2007;27(4):908–913. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2006.11.001
18.
NayakSS, PabiSK, MurtyBS.Al–(L1 2) Al 3 Ti nanocomposites prepared by mechanical alloying: synthesis and mechanical properties. J Alloys Compd. 2010;492(1):128–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.274
19.
WangX, JhaA, BrydsonR.In situ fabrication of Al3 Ti particle reinforced aluminium alloy metal–matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A. 2004;364(1):339–345. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2003.08.049
20.
HayesRW, RodriguezR, LaverniaEJ.The mechanical behavior of a cryomilled Al–10Ti–2Cu alloy. Acta Mater. 2001;49(19):4055–4068. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00278-6
21.
NofarM, HosseiniHM, Kolagar-DaroonkolaieN.Fabrication of high wear resistant Al/Al3 Ti metal matrix composite by in situ hot press method. Mater Des. 2009;30(2):280–286. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.071
22.
WuJM, ZhengSL, LiZZ.Thermal stability and its effects on the mechanical properties of rapidly solidified Al-Ti alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2000;289(1):246–254. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00886-8
23.
ZhangQ, XiaoBL, MaZY.Mechanically activated effect of friction stir processing in Al–Ti reaction mater. Chem Phys. 2013;139(2):596–602.
24.
FanZ, WangY, ZhangY, Grain refining mechanism in the Al/Al–Ti–B system. Acta Mater. 2015;84:292–304. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.055
25.
ZhangFY, YanMF, YouY, Prediction of elastic and electronic properties of cubic Al 18 Ti2 Mg3 phase coexisting with Al3 Ti in Al–Ti–Mg system. Physica B: Condens Matter. 2013;408:68–72. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2012.09.039
26.
GaoM, MeiSW, LiXY, Characterization and formation mechanism of laser-welded Mg and Al alloys using Ti interlayer. Scr Mater. 2012;67(2):193–196. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.04.015
27.
ZhangFY, YanMF.Performance characterization on a novel intermetallic layer produced by interdiffusion between Ti film and 5083 Al alloy. Vacuum. 2014;103:87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2013.12.007
28.
SongJY, GuoQ, OuyangQB, Influence of interfaces on the mechanical behavior of SiC particulate-reinforced Al–Zn–Mg–Cu composites. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015;644:79–84. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.07.050
29.
ZhangZH, ToppingT, LiY, Mechanical behavior of ultrafine-grained Al composites reinforced with B 4 C nanoparticles. Scr Mater. 2011;65(8):652–655. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.06.037
30.
ZhangQ, XiaoBL, WangD, Formation mechanism of in situ Al 3 Ti in Al matrix during hot pressing and subsequent friction stir processing. Mater Chem Phys.2011;130(3);1109–1117. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.08.042
31.
BarlowIC, JonesH, RainforthWM.The effect of heat treatment at 500–655°C on the microstructure and properties of mechanically alloyed Al–Ti–O based material. Mater Sci Eng A. 2003;351(1):344–357. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00860-2
32.
AlhazaaAN, KhanTI.Diffusion bonding of Al7075 to Ti–6Al–4V using Cu coatings and Sn–3.6Ag–1Cu interlayers. J Alloys Compd. 2010;494(1):351–358. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.01.037
33.
WuC, FangP, LuoG, Effect of plasma activated sintering parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-7075/B4 C composites. J Alloys Compd. 2014;615:276–282. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.06.110
34.
MaK, HuT, YangH, Coupling of dislocations and precipitates: impact on the mechanical behavior of ultrafine grained Al–Zn–Mg alloys. Acta Mater. 2016;103:153–164. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.017
35.
CortiCW, CotterillP, FitzpatrickGA.The evaluation of the interparticle spacing in dispersion alloys. Int Metall Rev. 1974;19(1):77–88.
