Two copper substrates electroplated with Sn, both consisted of Cu/Sn + Sn/Cu structures, but they were bonded over different times in order to investigate the interfacial reaction. The growth morphologies of Cu6Sn5 and Cu3Sn were analysed, respectively. The growth mechanisms for Cu6Sn5 and Cu3Sn were investigated. The results show that the growth of Cu6Sn5 is primarily controlled by grain boundary-diffusion. However, the growth Cu3Sn is controlled by the reaction of Cu-Cu6Sn5 at the beginning of the reaction, and then controlled by volume-diffusion as the thickness of the Cu3Sn layer increases.
LiuH, WangK, AasmundtveitKE, Intermetallic compound formation mechanisms for Cu-Sn solid–liquid interdiffusion bonding. J Electron Mater. 2012;41(9):2453–2462. doi: 10.1007/s11664-012-2060-3
2.
HuebnerH, PenkaS, BarchmannB, Microcontacts with sub-30 µm pitch for 3D chip-on-chip integration. Microelectron Eng. 2006;83(11):2155–2162. doi: 10.1016/j.mee.2006.09.026
3.
HuangZH, JonesRE, JainA.Experimental investigation of electromigration failure in Cu–Sn–Cu micropads in 3D integrated circuits. Microelectron Eng. 2014;122:46–51. doi: 10.1016/j.mee.2014.03.003
4.
LuuTT, DuanA, AasmundtveitKE, Optimized Cu-Sn wafer-level bonding using intermetallic phase characterization. J Electron Mater. 2013;42(12):3582–3592. doi: 10.1007/s11664-013-2711-z
5.
ChenC, YuD, ChenKN.Vertical interconnects of microbumps in 3D integration. MRS Bull. 2015;40(3):257–263. doi: 10.1557/mrs.2015.8
6.
LeeCC, WangPJ, KimJS.Are intermetallics in solder joints really brittle. Electronic Components and Technology Conference; 2007. p. 648–652.
7.
BoscoNS, ZokFW.Critical interlayer thickness for transient liquid phase bonding in the Cu–Sn system. Acta Mater. 2004;52(10):2965–2972. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.02.043
8.
TuK-N.Solder joint technology. New York ( NY): Springer; 2007. p. 211–218.
9.
TuKN.Interdiffusion and reaction in bimetallic Cu-Sn thin films. Acta Metall. 1973;21(4):347–354. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(73)90190-9
10.
ChungCK, DuhJG, KaoCR.Direct evidence for a Cu-enriched region at the boundary between Cu6Sn5 and Cu3Sn during Cu/Sn reaction. Scr Mater. 2010;63(2):258–260. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.011
11.
HsiaoHY, HuCC, GuoMY, Inhibiting the consumption of Cu during multiple reflows of Pb-free solder on Cu. Scr Mater. 2011;65(10):907–910. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.08.008
12.
HsiaoHY, LiuCM, LinHW, Unidirectional growth of microbumps on (111)-oriented and nanotwinned copper. Science. 2012;336(6084):1007–1010. doi: 10.1126/science.1216511
13.
HuangML, LoeherT, OstmannA, Role of Cu in dissolution kinetics of Cu metallization in molten Sn-based solders. Appl Phys Lett. 2005;86(18):181908. doi: 10.1063/1.1925317
14.
PaulA, GhoshC, BoettingerWJ.Diffusion parameters and growth mechanism of phases in the Cu-Sn system. Metall Mater Trans A. 2011;42(4):952–963. doi: 10.1007/s11661-010-0592-9
15.
BernalJD.The complex structure of the copper-tin intermetallic compounds. Nature. 1928;122:54. doi: 10.1038/122054a0
16.
SangX, DuK, YeH.An ordered structure of Cu3Sn in Cu–Sn alloy investigated by transmission electron microscopy. J Alloys Compd. 2009;469(1):129–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.01.107
17.
LeeNTS, TanVBC, LimKM.First-principles calculations of structural and mechanical properties of Cu6Sn5. Appl Phys Lett. 2006;88(3):1913.
18.
MaD, WangWD, LahiriSK.Scallop formation and dissolution of Cu–Sn intermetallic compound during solder reflow. J Appl Phys. 2002;91(5):3312–3317. doi: 10.1063/1.1445283
19.
TuKN, KuF, LeeTY.Morphological stability of solder reaction products in flip chip technology. J Electron Mater. 2001;30(9):1129–1132. doi: 10.1007/s11664-001-0139-3
20.
LiJF, AgyakwaPA, JohnsonCM.Interfacial reaction in Cu/Sn/Cu system during the transient liquid phase soldering process. Acta Mater. 2011;59(3):1198–1211. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.053
21.
TuK-N, ZengK.Tin-lead (SnPb) solder reaction in flip chip technology. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2001;34(1):1–58. doi: 10.1016/S0927-796X(01)00029-8
22.
TuKN, MayerJW, FeldmanLC.Electronic thin film science for electrical engineers and materials scientists. New York ( NY): MacMillan; 100; 1992.
23.
ArdellAJ.Phase transformations’ 87. Brookfield ( VT): The Institute of Metals; 1988.
24.
VoorheesPW.The theory of Ostwald ripening. J Stat Phys. 1985;38(1–2):231–252. doi: 10.1007/BF01017860
25.
MaCH, SwalinRA.A study of solute diffusion in liquid tin. Acta Metall. 1960;8(6):388–395. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(60)90008-0
26.
TuKN, LeeTY, JangJW, Wetting reaction versus solid state aging of eutectic SnPb on Cu. J Appl Phys. 2001;89(9):4843–4849. doi: 10.1063/1.1357469
27.
OnishiM, FujibuchiH.Reaction-diffusion in the Cu–Sn system. Trans JIM. 1975;16(9):539–547. doi: 10.2320/matertrans1960.16.539
28.
PaulA, KodentsovAA, van LooFJJ.Intermetallic growth and Kirkendall effect manifestations in Cu/Sn and Au/Sn diffusion couples: dedicated to Prof. Dr. Helmut Mehrer on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Z MetaIlkd. 2004;95(10):913–920. doi: 10.3139/146.018032
29.
LaurilaT, VuorinenV, KivilahtiJK.Interfacial reactions between lead-free solders and common base materials. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2005;49(1):1–60. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2005.03.001
30.
RönkäKJ, van LooFJJ, KivilahtiJK.A diffusion-kinetic model for predicting solder/conductor interactions in high density interconnections. Metall Mater Trans A. 1998;29(12):2951–2956. doi: 10.1007/s11661-998-0202-2
31.
MitaM, KajiharaM, KurokawaN, Growth behavior of Ni3Sn4 layer during reactive diffusion between Ni and Sn at solid-state temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A. 2005;403(1):269–275. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.05.012
