AZ31 alloy ring was successfully processed by hot forging. The effects of effective strain and temperature distributions on the microstructure and the relationship between microstructure and mechanical properties of the ring were investigated. The effective strain distribution at the centre region is relatively uniform, while the temperature in or near the flash region is higher than the other regions. A refined but inhomogeneous microstructure is obtained in the ring. It shows that the larger the accumulated strain and the lower the temperature are, the finer and more homogeneous the microstructure will be achieved. The mechanical responses of the ring from different tensile directions differ greatly. The radial direction sample shows the lowest yield strength and the largest fracture elongation.
ZhouG., HuaL. and QianD. S.: ‘3D coupled thermo-mechanical FE analysis of roll size effects on the radial–axial ring rolling process’, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2011, 50, 911–924. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.10.029
2.
MoussaG. and HawkyardJ. B.: ‘Investigation into the multi-stage ring rolling of aluminium bicycle wheel rim’, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1986, 28, 841–851. doi: 10.1016/0020-7403(86)90030-5
3.
WangM., YangH., SunZ. C. and GuoL.G.: ‘Analysis of coupled mechanical and thermal behaviors in hot rolling of large rings of titanium alloy using 3D dynamic explicit FEM’, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2009, 209, 3384–3395. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.07.054
4.
KimW. J. and SaY. K.: ‘Micro-extrusion of ECAP processed magnesium alloy for production of high strength magnesium micro-gears’, Scr. Mater., 2006, 54, 1391–1395. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.066
5.
LuoS. J., ChenQ. and ZhaoZ. D.: ‘Effects of processing parameters on the microstructure of ECAE-formed AZ91D magnesium alloy in the semi-solid state’, J. Alloy. Compd., 2009, 477, 602–607. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.101
6.
ZhaoZ. D., ChenQ., WangY. B. and ShuD. Y.: ‘Microstructural evolution of an ECAE-formed ZK60-RE magnesium alloy in the semi-solid state’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2009, 506, 8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.12.042
7.
EdalatiK., YamamotoA., HoritaZ. and IshiharaT.: ‘High-pressure torsion of pure magnesium: Evolution of mechanical properties, microstructures and hydrogen storage capacity with equivalent strain’, Scr. Mater., 2011, 64, 880–883. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.01.023
8.
Pérez-PradoM. T., del ValleJ. A. and RuanoO. A.: ‘Grain refinement of Mg–Al–Zn alloys via accumulative roll bonding’, Scr. Mater., 2004, 51, 1093–1097. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.07.028
9.
ChangH., ZhengM. Y., WuK., GanW. M., TongL. B. and BrokmeierH.-G.: ‘Microstructure and mechanical properties of the accumulative roll bonded (ARBed) pure magnesium sheet’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2007, 527, 7176–7183. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.07.065
10.
MiuraH., YuG. and YangX.: ‘Multi-directional forging of AZ61Mg alloy under decreasing temperature conditions and improvement of its mechanical properties’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, 528, 6981–6992. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.05.050
11.
MiuraT. Maruoka, YangX. and JonasJ. J.: ‘Microstructure and mechanical properties of multi-directionally forged Mg–Al–Zn alloy’, Scr. Mater., 2006, 66, 49–51. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.10.005
12.
YangY., SunZ. Y., XingJ., MiuraH. and SakaiT.: ‘Grain size and texture changes of magnesium alloy AZ31 during multi-directional forging’, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2008, 18, 200–204. doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(10)60202-6
13.
WuY. Z., YanH. G., ChenJ. H., DuY. G., ZhuS. Q. and SuB.: ‘Microstructure and mechanical properties of ZK21 magnesium alloy fabricated by multiple forging at different strain rates’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, 556, 164–169. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.06.074
14.
ZhaoZ. Y., GuanR. G., WangX., DaiC. G., AnC. G., LiuC. M. and LeeC. S.: ‘Effects of dynamic recrystallisation during deep rolling of semisolid slab and heat treatment on microstructure and properties of AZ31 alloy’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, 30, 309–315. doi: 10.1179/1743284713Y.0000000343
15.
LimS. C. V. and YongM. S.: ‘Plane-strain forging of wrought magnesium alloy AZ31’, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2006, 171, 393–398. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.07.011
16.
KimW. J., LeeH. W., ParkJ. P., KimM. G. and YoonU. S.: ‘Forging of Mg–3Al–1Zn–1Ca alloy prepared by high-frequency electromagnetic casting’, Mater. Des., 2009, 30, 4120–4125. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.003
17.
MaksoudI. A., AhmedH. and RödelJ.: ‘Investigation of the effect of strain rate and temperature on the deformability and microstructure evolution of AZ31 magnesium alloy’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2009, 504, 40–48. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.10.033
18.
GuoW., WangQ. D., YeB., LiuM. P., PengT., LiuX. T. and ZhouH.: ‘Enhanced microstructure homogeneity and mechanical properties of AZ31 magnesium alloy by repetitive upsetting’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, 540, 115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.01.111
19.
KoikeJ., KobayashiT., MukaiT., WatanabeH., SuzukiM., MaruyamaK. and HigashiK.: ‘The activity of non-basal slip systems and dynamic recovery at room temperature in fine-grained AZ31B magnesium alloys’, Acta Mater., 2003, 51, 2055–2065. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00005-3
20.
AgnewS. R., HortonJ. A., LilloT. M. and BrownD. W.: ‘Enhanced ductility in strongly textured magnesium produced by equal channel angular processing’, Scr. Mater., 2004, 50, 377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.10.006
21.
LiuJ. and CuiZ. S.: ‘Hot forging process design and parameters determination of magnesium alloy AZ31B spur bevel gear’, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2009, 209, 5871–5880. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.06.015
22.
YuK., ShiT., WangR. C., LiW. X., WangX. Y. and CaiZ. Y.: ‘Thermo-mechanical simulation of AZ31 magnesium alloy’, J. Cent. South Univ. (Sci. and Technol.), 2008, 39, 216–220(in Chinese).
23.
LvL. H.: ‘Principles of metal plastic deformation and rolling’, 39; 2006, Beijing, Chemical Industry Press(in Chinese).
24.
SinghA., SomekawaH. and MukaiT.: ‘Compressive strength and yield asymmetry in extruded Mg-Zn-Ho alloys containing quasicrystal phase’, Scr. Mater., 2007, 56, 935–938. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.02.015
25.
XuS., LiuT., GanW., TanA. and WangJ.: ‘Modified twinning behaviour induced by texture evolution in hot rolled Mg–3Al–1Zn alloy’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, 30, 694–699. doi: 10.1179/1743284713Y.0000000404
26.
JiangL., JonasJ. J., MishraR. K., LuoA. A., SachdevA. K. and GodetS.: ‘Twinning and texture development in two Mg alloys subjected to loading along three different strain paths’, Acta Mater., 2007, 55, 3899–3910. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.006
27.
HeJ. J., LiuT. M., ChenH. B., LongZ. X., LuL. W. and PanF. S.: ‘Roles of detwinning in strain hardening and ultimate elongation in extruded Mg–3Al–1Zn alloy’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2014, 30, 1343–1348. doi: 10.1179/1743284713Y.0000000454
28.
HongS.-G., ParkS. H. and LeeC. S.: ‘Role of {10–12} twinning characteristics in the deformation behavior of a polycrystalline magnesium alloy’, Acta Mater., 2010, 58, 5873–5885. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.002
29.
LiuQ.: ‘Research progress on plastic deformation mechanism of Mg alloys’, Acta Metall. Sin., 2010, 46, (11), 1458–1472(in Chinese). doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1037.2010.01458
