Modelling school participation based on the theory of planned behaviour / Modelamiento de la participación escolar basado en la teoría del comportamiento planificado
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2019
Modelling school participation based on the theory of planned behaviour / Modelamiento de la participación escolar basado en la teoría del comportamiento planificado
This study evaluated a predictive model of school participation based on Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour. Attitudes towards social justice, perceived control and subjective norm on school participation were tested, mediated by the behavioural intention in favour of social justice in a sample of 443 secondary school students. The proposed model showed good fit (χ2 = 597.740, df = 342; RMSEA = .041). The behavioural intentions towards social justice and perceived behavioural control were directly related to school participation. An indirect effect of perceived control on participation was detected, mediated by behavioural intention, but no evidence was found of the indirect effect of either attitude or norm on school participation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
2.
AjzenI. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665–683. doi:10.1111/jasp.2002.32.issue-4
3.
AjzenI. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26, 1113–1127. doi:10.1080/08870446.2011.613995
4.
AutinK. L.DuffyR. D.AllanB. K. (2017). A focus on others and commitment to social justice: A social cognitive perspective. Journal of Career Assessment, 25, 238–253. doi:10.1177/1069072715621515
5.
AwadA. (2018). Justicia social y participación escolar en estudiantes de enseñanza media de Concepción. (Master's thesis). Universidad de Concepción, Concepción.
6.
BellL. A. (2013). Theoretical foundations. In AdamsM.BlumenfeldW. J.CastañedaC.HackmanH. W.PetersM. L.ZúñigaX. (Eds.), Readings for diversity and social justice (3rd ed., pp. 21–26). New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
BentlerP. M.DudgeonP. (1996). Covariance structure analysis: Statistical practice, theory and directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 563–592. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.563
8.
BourdieuP.PasseronJ. C. (1977). La reproducción. Elementos para una teoría de la enseñanza. Barcelona: Laia.
9.
CicognaniE.AlbanesiC.MazzoniD.PratiG.ZaniB. (2016). Explaining offline and online civic engagement intentions between Italian and migrant youth. International Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 282–316.
10.
CokleyK.AwadG. (2013). In defense of quantitative methods: Using the “master’s tools” to promote social justice. The Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology, 5, 26–41.
11.
CornejoR.RedondoJ. (2001). El clima escolar percibido por los alumnos de enseñanza media: Una investigación en algunos liceos de la región metropolitana. Última Década, 15, 11–52.
12.
FeinsteinC.GierstenA.O’KaneC. (2010). Children’s participation in armed conflict and post-conflict peace building. In Percy-SmithB.ThomasN. (Eds.), A handbook of children and young people´s participation. Perspectives from theory and practice (pp. 53–62). New York, NY: Routledge: Madison Avenue.
13.
FietzerA.PonterottoJ. (2015). A psychometric review of instruments for social justice and advocacy attitudes. Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology, 7, 19–40.
14.
FraserN. (2007). Feminist politics in the age of recognition: A two-dimensional approach to gender justice. Studies in Social Justice, 1, 23–35. doi:10.26522/ssj.v1i1.979
15.
FraserN. (2008). Escalas de justicia. Barcelona: Herder.
16.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
17.
IBM SPSS. (2015). IBM SPSS STATISTIC program, version 23. New York, NY: IBM corporation.
18.
JASP Team. (2018). JASP (Version 0.8.4) [Computer software] (BibTex).
19.
John-AkinolaY.Nic-GabhainnS. (2014). Children’s participation in school: A cross-sectional study of the relationship between school environments, participation and health and well-being outcomes. BMC Public Health, 14, 964–974. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-964
20.
JostJ. T.KayA. C. (2010). Social justice. History, theory, and research. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 5th ed., pp. 1122–1165). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
21.
JostL. J.JostJ. T. (2007). Why Marx left philosophy for social science. Theory & Psychology, 17, 297–322. doi:10.1177/0959354307075047
22.
KringsA.AusticE. A.GutiérrezL. M.DirksenK. E. (2015). The comparative impacts of social justice educational methods on political participation, civic engagement, and multicultural activism. Equity & Excellence in Education, 48, 403–417. doi:10.1080/10665684.2015.1057087
23.
LorenzW. (2014). The emergence of social injustice in West. In ReischM. (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of social justice (pp. 14–26). London: Routledge.
24.
MacFarlaneK.MarksL. (2013). Teacher attitudes and behavior toward the inclusion of children with social, emotional and behavioral difficulties in mainstream schools: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 46–52. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.006
25.
MartínezM. L.SilvaC.CarmonaM.Cumsille.P. (2012). Young Chileans’ views of citizenship: Findings from the first generation born after the reinstitution of democracy. Applied Developmental Science, 16, 167–180. doi:10.1080/10888691.2012.722889
26.
MurilloF. J.HernándezR. (2011). Hacia un concepto de justicia social. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 9, 7–23.
27.
MuthénL.MuthénB. (2013). Mplus 7.11. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
28.
Pérez-SalasC.SirlopúD.CoboR.AwadA. (2018). Análisis bifactorial del cuestionario participación del estudiante en la escuela. (Pending publication).
29.
ReuveniY.WernerP. (2015). Factors associated with teenagers’ willingness to volunteer with elderly persons: Application of the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Educational Gerontology, 41, 623–634. doi:10.1080/03601277.2015.1029768
30.
RodríguezM.KohenR.DelvalJ.MessinaC. (2016). De la escuela democrática a la participación política y ciudadana. Cultura y Educación, 28, 99–129. doi:10.1080/11356405.2015.1120449
31.
SenA. (2010). La idea de la justicia. Madrid: Taurus.
32.
Sepúlveda-ParraC.Brunaud-VegaV.CarreñoC. (2016). Justicia social en la escuela: Representaciones de estudiantes de educación secundaria y desafíos para la formación del profesorado. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social (RIEJS), 5, 109–129.
33.
SharmaU.AielloP.PaceE. M.RoundP.SubbanP. (2017). In-service teachers’ attitudes, concerns, efficacy and intentions to teach in inclusive classrooms: An international comparison of Australian and Italian teachers. European Journal of Special Needs Education. doi:10.1080/08856257.2017.1361139
34.
TedescoJ. C. (2014). Educación y desigualdad en América Latina y el Caribe: Aportes para la agenda post-2015. Santiago: OREALC/UNESCO.
35.
Torres-HardingS. R.SiersB.OlsonB. D. (2012). Development and psychometric evaluation of the social justice scale (SJS). American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 77–88. doi:10.1007/s10464-011-9478-2
36.
Van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psyhological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 353–372. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
37.
VelásquezE.MartínezM. L.CumsilleS. (2004). Expectativas de autoeficacia y actitud prosocial asociadas a la participación ciudadana en jóvenes. Psykhe, 13, 85–98. doi:10.4067/S0718-22282004000200007
38.
YanZ.SinK. (2014). Inclusive education: Teachers’ intentions and behaviour analysed from the viewpoint of the theory of planned behaviour. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18, 72–85. doi:10.1080/13603116.2012.757811
