BerkR.A.RossiP.H., 1976, Doing good or worse: evaluation research politically reexamined, Social Problems, 23, 3, pp. 337–349
2.
BickmanL., 1980, Using program theory in evaluation, Beverly Hills, Sage
3.
BrownH.J., 1984, La nueva filosofía de la ciencia, Madrid, Tecnos
4.
CampbellD.T., 1969, Can we be scientific in applied social science?, en ConnerR.F.AltmanD.G.JacksonC. (eds.), Evaluation Studies Review Annual, Beverly Hills, Sage
5.
CampbellD.T., 1971, Artifact and control, en RosenthalR.RosnowR. L. (eds.), Artifact in behavioral research, Nueva York, Academic
6.
CampbellD.T., 1977, Reforms as experiments, en FrancisG. (ed.), Readings in Evaluation Research, Nueva York, Russell Sage Foundation
7.
CaplanN.MorrisonA.StambaughR.J., 1975, The use of social science knowledge in policy decision on the national level, Ann Arbor, Institute for Social Research, Universidad de Michigan
8.
CookT.D., 1985, Postpositist Critica Multiplims, en ShotlandL.MarckM.M. (eds.), Social science and social policy, Beverly Hills, Sage
9.
CookT.D., 1986, Program evaluation: the worldly science, Annual Review of Psychology, 37, pp. 193–232
10.
CookT.D.Levinson-RoseJ.G.PollardW.E., 1980, The misutilization of evaluation research: some pitfalls of definition, Knowledge: creation, diffusion, utilization, 1, 4, pp. 477–498
11.
CronbachL.J., 1982, Designing evaluation of educational and social programs, Beverly Hills, Sage
12.
ChenH.T.RossiP.H., 1980, The multi-goal theory driven approach to evaluation: a model linking basic and applied social science, Social Forces, 59, pp. 106–122
13.
GubaE.G., 1987, What have we learned about naturalistic evaluation? Evaluation Practice, 8, 1, pp. 23–44
14.
MertonR.K., 1973/1985, La sociologyía de la ciencia, Madrid, Alianza Universidad
15.
OeserE., 1984, La evolución del método científico, en LorenzK.WketitsF.M. (eds.), La evolución del pensamiento, Barcelona, Argos-Vergara Reason, P. y Rowan, J., Human Inquiry, Nueva York, Wiley
16.
RossiL.M.FreemanF.H., 1985, Evaluation. A systematic approach, Beverly Hills, Sage
17.
ScrivenM., 1983, Evaluation ideologies, en ConnerF.AltmanD.G.JacksonC. (eds.), Evaluation studies review annual, Beverly Hills, Sage
18.
SeidmanE., 1983, Unexamined pemises of social problem solving, en SeidmanE. (ed.), Handbook of Social Intervention, Beverly Hills, Sage
19.
WeissC., 1977, Research for policy sake: the enlightenment function of social research, Policy Analysis, 3, 4, pp. 531–545
20.
WeissC., 1978, Improving the linkage between social research and public policy, en LynnL.E. (ed.), Knowledge and policy, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C..
21.
WeissC.BuscivalasM.J., 1981, Truth tests and utility test: a decision maker's frame of reference for social science research, en FreemanH.F.SolomonM. A. (eds.), Evaluation studies, Vol. 3, Beverly Hills, Sage