Se presentan dos investigaciones en las que se estudian el efecto del sexo del sujeto, el sexo de la persona estímulo y el tipo de tarea sobre las atribuciones causales de éxito. En el estudio 1, a los sujetos experimentales se les describe una persona estímulo, hombre o mujer, que realiza una tarea (oposiciones) típicamente masculina o femenina. El estudio 2 es idéntico al anterior salvo en la forma de presentar el tipo de tarea. Los resultados obtenidos no apoyan el modelo de Deaux (1976) que ha sido adoptado por muchos autores, pero sugiere, en cambio, otras líneas de investigación de las atribuciones causales de éxito en la tarea.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrovermanI.VogelS.R.BrovermanD.ClarksonF.E.RosenkrantzP.S., 1972, Sex role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, pp. 59–78.
2.
CarrollJ.S.WienerR.L., 1982, Cognitive Social Psychology in court and beyond. En HastorfA.H.IsenA.M. (eds): Cognitive Social Psychology, New York, Elsevier, pp. 199–253
3.
CashT.F.GillenB.BurnsD.S., 1977, Sexism and “beautyism” in personal consultant decision-making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, pp. 301–310.
4.
DeauxK., 1976, Sex and the attribution process. en HarveyJ.H.IckesW.J.KiddR.F. (eds.): New directions in attribution research, vol. 1, Hillsdale, L. Erlbaum
5.
DeauxK., 1984, From individual differences to social categories. Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist, 39, pp. 105–116.
6.
DeauxK.EmswillerT., 1974, Explanations of succesful performance on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, pp. 80–85.
7.
DeauxK.FarrisE., 1977, Attribution causes for one's performance: The effects of sex, norms, and outcome. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, pp. 59–72.
8.
EaglyA.H., 1978, Sex differences in influenceability. Psychological Bulletin, 85, pp. 86–116.
9.
EtaughC.BrownB., 1975, Perceiving the causes of success and failure of male and female performers. Developmental Psychology, 11, p. 103.
10.
FeatherN.T.SimonJ.G., 1971, Attribution of responsability and valence of outcome in relation to initial confidence and success and failure of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, pp. 173–188.
11.
FeatherN.T.SimonJ.G., 1975, Reactions to male and female success and failure in sex-linked occupations: Impressions of personality, causal attribution and perceived likelihood of differential consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, pp. 20–31.
12.
Feldman-SummersS.KieslerS.B., 1974, Those who are number two try harder: The effect of sex on attributions of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, pp. 846–855.
13.
FiskeS.T.TaylorS.E., 1984, Social cognition. Reading, Addison-Wesley.
14.
FriezeI.H., 1976, The role of information processing in making causal attributions for success and failure. en CarrollJ.S.PayneJ.W. (eds.), Cognition and social behavior, Nueva York, Elsevier, pp. 95–112.
15.
GradyK.E., 1977, Sex as a social label: The illusion of sex differences. Tesis doctoral no publicada, Graduate Center, Universidad de la Ciudad de Nueva York.
16.
HaccounD.M.StacyS., 1980, Perceptions of male and female success or failure in relation to spouse encouragement and sex-association of occupation. Sex Roles, 6, pp. 819–831.
17.
HansenR.D.O'learyV.E., 1983, Actresses and actors: The effects of sex on causal attributions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 4, pp. 209–230.
18.
HeiderF., 1958, The psychology of interpersonal relations, Nueva York, Wiley
19.
HeilmanM.E.GuzzoR.A., 1978, The perceived cause of work success as a mediator of sex discrimination in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, pp. 346–357.
20.
HuberV.L.PodsakoffP.M.TodorW.D., 1985, A dimensional analysis of supervisor and subordinate attributions of success and failure. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 6, pp. 131–142.
21.
HuiciC., 1984, The individual and social functions of sex role stereotypes. En TajfelH. (ed.): The social dimension. 2 vol., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 579–602.
22.
JonesE.E.DavisK.E., 1965, From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. En BerkowitzL. (ed.): Advances in ExperimentalSocial Psychology, vol. 2. Nueva York, Academic.
23.
JonesE.E.McgillisD., 1976, Correspondent inferences and the attribution cube: A comparative reappraisal. En HarveyJ.H.IciW.J.
24.
IckesKiddR.F. (eds.): New directions in attribution research, vol. 1. Hillsdale, L. Erlbaum
25.
KelleyH.H., 1967, Attribution theory in social psychology. en LevineD. (ed.): Nebraska Symposium on motivation. Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press.
26.
KelleyH.H., 1972, Causal schemata and the attribution process.Morristown, General Learning Press.
27.
KelleyH.H.MichelaJ.K., 1980, Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, pp. 457–499.
28.
KinickiA. J.GriffethE.W., 1985, The impact of sex-role stereotypes on performance ratings and causal attributions of performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27, pp. 155–170.
29.
MaccobyE.E.JacklinC.N., 1974, The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, Stanford University Press.
30.
MurphyV., 1977, Effects of success and failure on perceptions of gender identity. Sex Roles, 2, pp. 367–374.
31.
NievaV.F.GutekB. A., 1980, Sex effects on evaluation. Academic of Management Review, 5, pp. 267–276.
32.
O'learyV.E.HansenR.D., 1984, Sex as an attributional fact. en LevineD. (ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Psychology and gender. Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press
33.
RossM.FletcherG.J.O., 1985, Attribution and social perception. en LindzeyG.AronsonE. (eds.): Handbook of Social Psychology, 3a edic., Nueva York, Random House, vol. 2, pp. 73–122.
34.
TaynorJ.DeauxK., 1973, When women are more deserving than men: Equity attribution and perceived sex differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, pp. 260–267.
35.
TaynorJ.DeauxK., 1975, Equity and perceived sex differences: Role behavior as defined by the task, die mode, and the actor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, pp. 381–390.
36.
TouheyJ.C., 1974, Effect of additional women professionals on ratings of occupational prestige and desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, pp. 86–89.
37.
TurnerJ.C.., 1987, Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, Blackwell.
38.
UngerR.K., 1987, Female and male. Nueva York, Harper and Row. Wallston, B.S. y O'Leary, V.E. (1981) Sex makes a difference: Differential perceptions of women and men. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, pp. 9–41.
39.
WeinerB., 1974, Achievement behavior and attribution theory, Morristown, General Learning Press
40.
WeinerB.FriezeI.H.KuklaA.ReedL.RestS.Rosenbaum, 1971, Perceiving the causes of success and failure. Morristown, General Learning Press.
41.
WittigM.A., 1985, Sex-role norms and gender-related attainment values: Their role in attributions of success and failure. Sex Roles, 12, pp. 1–13.
