The question ‘what is working memory capacity?’ can be approached from the individual-differences and the experimental perspective. The first part of the article reviews individual-differences research that aims to determine the source of common variance among tests of working memory and related complex cognitive activities, such as reasoning and text comprehension. I propose that the ability to build, maintain and update temporary bindings between content and context representations underlies the shared variance of these variables. Multiple bindings must be maintained simultaneously for building new structural representations that underlie reasoning and language comprehension. Interference between these bindings limits the complexity of these structural representations. The second part of the article reviews experimental work, informed by computational modelling of the mechanisms of working memory. I introduce an interference-based model of working memory, SOB-CS, and review experiments with complex-span tasks that test predictions from that model. The experiments support the assumption that the capacity of working memory is limited by two forms of interference: interference by superposition of multiple bindings between distributed representations, and interference by confusion of similar items, and of items bound to similar contexts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckermanP. L.BeierM. E.BoyleM. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs?Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30–60. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.30
2.
AllowayT. P.GathercoleS. E.WillisC.AdamsA.-M. (2004). A structural analysis of working memory and related cognitive skills in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 85–106. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2003.10.002
3.
AndrewsG.HalfordG. S. (2002). A cognitive complexity metric applied to cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 153–219. doi:10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00002-6
4.
BarrouilletP.BernardinS.PortratS.VergauweE.CamosV. (2007). Time and cognitive load in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 33, 570–585.
5.
BaylissD. M.JarroldC.GunnD. M.BaddeleyA. D. (2003). The complexities of complex span: Explaining individual differences in working memory in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 71–92. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.71
6.
BradyT. F.AlvarezG. A. (2015). No evidence for a fixed object limit in working memory: Spatial ensemble representations inflate estimates of working memory capacity for complex objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 921–929. doi:10.1037/xlm0000075
7.
BrownG. D. A.PreeceT.HulmeC. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 107, 127–181. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.127
8.
BrownJ. (1958). Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 12–21. doi:10.1080/17470215808416249
9.
CaseR.KurlandM.GoldbergJ. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 386–404. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(82)90054-6
10.
CheinJ. M.MooreA. B.ConwayA. R. A. (2011). Domain-general mechanisms of complex working memory span. NeuroImage, 54, 550–559. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.067
11.
CowanN. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–114. doi:10.1017/S0140525X01003922
12.
CowanN.SaultsJ. S.BlumeC. L. (2014). Central and peripheral components of working memory storage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1806–1836. doi:10.1037/a0036814
13.
DanemanM.CarpenterP. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6
14.
DunbarK.BlanchetteI. (2001). The in vivo/in vitro approach to cognition: The case of analogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 334–339. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01698-3
15.
EndressA. D.PotterM. C. (2014). Large capacity temporary visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 548–565. doi:10.1037/a0033934
16.
FandakovaY.SanderM. C.Werkle-BergnerM.ShingY. L. (2014). Age differences in short-term memory binding are related to working memory performance across the lifespan. Psychology and Aging, 29, 140–149. doi:10.1037/a0035347
17.
FarrellS.LewandowskyS. (2002). An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 59–79. doi:10.3758/BF03196257
18.
FarrellS.LewandowskyS. (2004). Modelling transposition latencies: Constraints for theories of serial order memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 115–135. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.007
19.
FarrellS.OberauerK.GreavesM.PasiecznikK.LewandowskyS.JarroldC. (2016). A test of interference versus decay in working memory: Varying distraction within lists in a complex span task. Journal of Memory and Language, 90, 66–87. doi:10.1037/rev0000015
20.
FougnieD.ZughniS.GodwinD.MaroisR. (2015). Working memory storage is intrinsically domain specific. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 30–47. doi:10.1037/a0038211
21.
GentnerD. (1988). Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift. Child Development, 59, 47–59. doi:10.2307/1130388
22.
GentnerD.StevensA. L. (1983). Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
GickM. L.HolyoakK. J. (1987). The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer. In CormierS. M.HagmanJ. D. (Eds.), Transfer of learning (pp. 9–46). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24.
HalfordG. S.BakerR.McCreddenJ. E.BainJ. D. (2004). How many variables can humans process?Psychological Science, 16, 70–76. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00782.x
25.
HalfordG. S.WilsonW. H.PhillipsS. (1998). Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 803–864. doi:10.1017/S0140525X98001769
26.
HealeyM. K.KahanaM. J. (2015). A four-component model of age-related memory change. Psychological Review, 123, 23–69. doi:10.1037/rev0000015
27.
HensonR. N. A.NorrisD. G.PageM. P. A.BaddeleyA. D. (1996). Unchained memory: Error patterns rule out chaining models of immediate serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 80–115. doi:10.1080/713755612
28.
HowardM. W.KahanaM. J. (2002). A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 269–299. doi:10.1006/jmps.2001.1388
29.
HummelJ. E.HolyoakK. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104, 427–466. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.3.427
30.
JarroldC.TowseJ. N. (2006). Individual differences in working memory. Neuroscience, 139, 39–50. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.07.002
31.
Johnson-LairdP. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: University Press.
32.
Johnson-LairdP. N.ByrneR. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33.
Johnson-LairdP. N.KhemlaniS. S.GoodwinG. P. (2015). Logic, probability, and human reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 201–214. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.02.006
34.
JonesM. N.KintschW.MewhortD. J. K. (2006). High-dimensional semantic space accounts of priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 534–552. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.003
35.
JustM. A.CarpenterP. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122
36.
KintschW. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
37.
LewandowskyS.FarrellS. (2008). Short-term memory: New data and a model. In RossB. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 49, pp. 1–48). London: Elsevier.
38.
LewandowskyS.GeigerS. M.MorrellD. B.OberauerK. (2010). Turning simple span into complex span: Time for decay or interference from distractors?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 36, 958–978.
39.
LewandowskyS.GeigerS. M.OberauerK. (2008). Interference-based forgetting in verbal short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 200–222. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.04.004
40.
Lewis-PeacockJ. A.DrysdaleA. T.PostleB. R. (2015). Neural evidence for the flexible control of mental representations. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 3303–3313. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu130
41.
MaW. J.HusainM.BaysP. M. (2014). Changing concepts of working memory. Nature Neuroscience Reviews, 17, 347–356. doi:10.1038/nn.3655
42.
MaylorE. A.VousdenJ. I.BrownG. D. A. (1999). Adult age differences in short-term memory for serial order: Data and a model. Psychology & Aging, 14, 572–594. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.14.4.572
43.
NairneJ. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 251–269. doi:10.3758/BF03213879
44.
OberauerK. (2005a). Binding and inhibition in working memory: Individual and age differences in short-term recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 134, 368–387. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.368
45.
OberauerK. (2005b). The measurement of working memory capacity. In WilhelmO.EngleR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence (pp. 393–408). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
OberauerK. (2008). How to say no: Single- and dual-process theories of short-term recognition tested on negative probes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 439–459.
47.
OberauerK.FarrellS.JarroldC.LewandowskyS. (2016). What limits working memory capacity?Psychological Bulletin, 142, 758–799. doi:10.1037/bul0000046
48.
OberauerK.FarrellS.JarroldC.PasiecznikK.GreavesM. (2012). Interference between maintenance and processing in working memory: The effect of item-distractor similarity in complex span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 665–685. doi:10.1037/a0026337
49.
OberauerK.KlieglR. (2001). Beyond resources: Formal models of complexity effects and age differences in working memory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 187–215. doi:10.1080/09541440042000278
50.
OberauerK.LewandowskyS. (2008). Forgetting in immediate serial recall: Decay, temporal distinctiveness, or interference?Psychological Review, 115, 544–576. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.3.544
51.
OberauerK.LewandowskyS. (2014). Further evidence against decay in working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 73, 15–30. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.02.003
52.
OberauerK.LewandowskyS.FarrellS.JarroldC.GreavesM. (2012). Modeling working memory: An interference model of complex span. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 779–819. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0272-4
53.
OberauerK.SchulzeR.WilhelmO.SüßH.-M. (2005). Working memory and intelligence - their correlation and their relation: A comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 61–65. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.61
54.
OberauerK.SüßH.-M.SchulzeR.WilhelmO.WittmannW. W. (2000). Working memory capacity - facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1017–1045. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00251-2
55.
OberauerK.SüßH.-M.WilhelmO.WittmannW. W. (2003). The multiple faces of working memory - storage, processing, supervision, and coordination. Intelligence, 31, 167–193. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00115-0
56.
OlsonI. R.JiangY. (2002). Is visual short-term memory object based? Rejection of the “strong-object” hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1055–1067. doi:10.3758/BF03194756
57.
ÖztekinI.McElreeB. (2010). Relationship between measures of working memory capacity and the time course of short-term memory retrieval and interference resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 383–397.
58.
ParkD. C.LautenschlagerG.HeddenT.DavidsonN. S.SmithA. D.SmithP. K. (2002). Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychology & Aging, 17, 299–320. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.17.2.299
59.
PirolliP. L.AndersonJ. R. (1985). The role of learning from examples in the acquisition of recursive programming skills. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39, 240–272. doi:10.1037/h0080061
60.
RerkoL.OberauerK.LinH.-Y. (2014). Spatially imprecise representations in working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 3–15. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.789543
61.
RickerT. J.VergauweE.CowanN. (2014). Decay theory of immediate memory: From Brown (1958) to today (2014). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 1969–1995. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.914546
62.
RinckM.HähnelA.BowerG. H.GlowallaU. (1997). The metrics of spatial situation models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 622–637.
63.
SaitoS.MiyakeA. (2004). On the nature of forgetting and the processing-storage relationship in reading span performance. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 425–443. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2003.12.003
64.
SalthouseT. A. (1994). How many causes are there of aging-related decrements in cognitive functioning?Developmental Review, 14, 413–437. doi:10.1006/drev.1994.1016
65.
SandersA. F.SchrootsJ. J. F. (1969). Cognitive categories and memory span III. Effects of similarity on recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 21–28. doi:10.1080/14640746908400190
66.
SaultsJ. S.CowanN. (2007). A central capacity limit to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 663–684. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.663
67.
SederbergP. B.GershmanS. J.PolynS. M.NormanK. A. (2011). Human memory reconsolidation can be explained using the temporal context model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 455–468. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0086-9
68.
Tamber-RosenauB. J.FintziA. R.MaroisR. (2015). Crowding in visual working memory reveals its spatial resolution and the nature of its representations. Psychological Science, 26, 1511–1521. doi:10.1177/0956797615592394
69.
TurnerM. L.EngleR. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5
70.
van der VeldeF.De KampsM. (2006). Neural blackboard architectures of combinatorial structures in cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 37–108. doi:10.1017/S0140525X06009022
71.
VergauweE.BarrouilletP.CamosV. (2010). Do mental processes share a domain-general resource?Psychological Science, 21, 384–390. doi:10.1177/0956797610361340
72.
WalshV. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space, and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 483–488. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002
73.
WilhelmO.HildebrandtA.OberauerK. (2013). What is working memory capacity, and how can we measure it?Frontiers in Psychology, 4. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00433
74.
YntemaD. B.MueserG. E. (1962). Keeping track of variables that have few or many states. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 391–395. doi:10.1037/h0045706
75.
ZwaanR. A.MaglianoJ. P.GraesserA. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 386–397.
