The article considers two postulates of Piaget’s epistemology (anti-reductionism and developmental perspective) to analyse three influential perspectives on cognition: nativist, sociocultural and situated cognition. Based on this analysis, we propose two cognitive processes (explicitation and implicitation) that can explain cognitive change from the most elementary and embodied knowledge to more sophisticated and cultural ones. Some empirical examples concerning external representations that support this proposal are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersenC.ScheuerN.Pérez EcheverríaM. P.TeubalE. (Eds.). (2008). Representational systems and practices as learning tolos in different fields of knowledge. Rotterdam: Sense.
2.
BautistaA.RothW.-M. (2012). The incarnate rhythm of geometrical knowing. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 91–104. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.09.003
3.
BronckartJ.-P. (2012). Contribution of Piagetian constructivism to social interactioinism. In MartíE.RodríguezC. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 43–58). New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions Publishers.
4.
CareyS. (2008). The origin of concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
ClarkA. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action and cognition extension. Oxford: Oxford Univerity Press.
6.
ClarkA.ChalmersD. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 7–19. doi:10.1093/analys/58.1.7
7.
DonaldM. (1991). Origins of modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
GabucioF.MartíE.EnfedaqueJ.GilabertS.KonstantinidouA. (2010). Niveles de comprensión de las tablas en alumnos de primaria y secundaria[Levels of graph comprehension in primary and secondary school students]. Cultura y Educación, 22, 183–197. doi:10.1174/113564010791304528
9.
GelmanR.GallistelC. R. (1978). The child’s understanding of number. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
GottliebG.WahlstenD.LickliterR. (2006). The significance of biology for human development: A developmental psychobiological system view. In LernerR. M. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Volume 1. Theoretical models of human development (pp. 210–257). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
11.
HirschfeldL. A.GelmanS. A. (1994). Mapping the mind. Domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
KayeK. (1982). The mental and social life of babies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
14.
KirshD. (1992). When is information explicitly represented? The Vancouver studies in cognitive science (pp. 340–365). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
KirshD. (2010). Thinking with external representations. AI and Society. Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Communication, 25, 441–454.
16.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
LakoffG.NúñezR. E. (2000). Where mathematics come from. How the embodied mind bring mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
18.
MartíE. (1996). Mechanisms of internalization and externalization of knowledge in Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s theories. In TryphonA.VonècheJ. (Eds.), Piaget-Vygotsky. The social génesis of thought (pp. 57–83). Hove: Psychology Press.
19.
MartíE. (2003). Representar el mundo externamente. La adquisición infantil de los sistema externos de representación [Representing the world externally. The acquisition of the external systems of representation by children]. Madrid: Antonio Machado.
20.
MartíE. (2012). Thinking with signs: From symbolic actions to external systems of representations. In MartíE.RodríguezC. (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 151–170). New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions Publishers.
21.
MartíE. (press). The Loss of Piaget as a Symptom: The issue of development in contemporary cognitive psychology. In CarréD.ValsinerJ.HamplS. (Eds.), Representing development: Social construction of models of change. Oxford: Routledge, Psychology Press.
22.
MartíE.Garcia-MilaM.GabucioF.KonstantinidouK. (2011). The construction of a double entry table: A study of primary and secondary school students’ difficulties. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26, 215–234. doi:10.1007/s10212-010-0046-1
23.
MartíE.PozoJ. I. (2000). Más allá de las representaciones mentales: La adquisición de los sistemas externos de representación[Beyond mental representations: The acquisition of external systems of representation]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 23(90), 11–30. doi:10.1174/021037000760087946
24.
MartíE.ScheuerN. (2015). Sistemas semióticos, cultura y conocimiento matemático temprano [Semiotic systems, culture and early mathematical knowledge]. Estudios de Psicología, 36, 1–17. doi:10.1080/02109395.2014.1000008
25.
NunesT.BryantP. (1996). Children doing mathematics. Oxford: Blackwell.
26.
OlsonD. R. (1994). The world on paper. The conceptual and cognitive implications for writing and reading. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
27.
OvertonW. F. (2006). Developmental psychology: Philosophy, concepts and methodology. In LernerR. M. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Volume 1. Theoretical models of human development (pp. 18–88). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
28.
Pérez-EcheverríaP.MartíE.PozoJ.-I. (2010). Los sistemas externos de representación como herramientas de la mente [External representation systems as tools of the mind]. Cultura y Educación, 22, 133–147. doi:10.1174/113564010791304519
29.
PiagetJ. (1936). La naissance de l’intelligence chez l’enfant[The origins of the intelligence in children]. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.
30.
PiagetJ. (1950). Introduction a l’épistémologie génétique[Introduction to the genetic epistemology]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
31.
PiagetJ. (1965). Études sociologiques[Sociological studies]. Genève: Droz.
32.
PiagetJ. (1967). Biologie et connaissance: Essai sur les relations entre les régulations organiques et les processus cognitifs[Biology and knowledge: An essay on the relations between organic regulations and cognitive processes]. Paris: Gallimard.
33.
PiagetJ. (1980). Recent studies in genetic epistemology. Cahiers de la Fondation Archives Jean Piaget, 1, 3–7.
34.
PozoJ. I. (2001). Humana mente. El mundo, la conciencia y la carne[Human mind. The world, the consciousness and the flesh]. Madrid: Morata.
35.
PozoJ. I. (2008). Aprendices y maestros [Apprentices and masters. The cognitive psychology of learning]. La psicología cognitive del aprendizaje. Madrid: Alianza editorial.
36.
RivièreA. (2003). El papel de la educación en el diseño del desarrollo humano[The role of education in the design of human development]. In BelinchónM.RosaA.SotilloM.MarichalarI. (Eds.), Obras escogidas: Metarrepresentación y semiosis[Selected Works: Metarepresentation and semiosis] (Vol. III, pp. 203–243). Madrid: Editorial Panamericana.
37.
RobbinsF.AydedeM. (2009). A short primer on situaded cognition. In RobbinsF.AydedeM. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 3–10). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
RochatP. (2012). Baby assault on Piaget. In MartíE.RodríguezC. (Eds.), After piaget (pp. 71–82). New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions Publishers.
39.
RodríguezC. (2006). Del ritmo al símbolo. Los signos en el nacimiento de la inteligencia[From rhythm to symbol. The signs in the origins of the intelligence]. Barcelona: Horsori.
40.
RodríguezMoroC. (1999). El mágico número tres. Cuando los niños aún no hablan[The magic number three. When children still do not talk]. Barcelona: Paidós.
41.
RodríguezC.ScheuerN. (2015). La paradoja entre el bebé numéricamente competente y el lento aprendizaje de los niños de dos a cuatro años de edad [The paradox between the numerically competent baby and the slow learning of two- to four-year-old children]. Estudios de Psicología, 36, 18–47. doi:10.1080/02109395.2014.1000009
42.
RogoffB. (1993). Aprendices del pensamiento. El desarrollo cognitivo en el contexto social[Apprenticeship in thinking. Cognitive development in social context]. Barcelona: Paidós (1st English edition in 1990).
43.
SalomonG. (Ed.). (1993). Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
ScheuerN.SinclairA.Merlo de RivasS.Tièche Christinat, Ch. (2000). Cuando ciento setenta y uno se escribe 10071: Niños de 5 a 8 años produciendo numerales[When a hundred and seventy one is written 10071: Five to eight-year-old’s production of written numbers]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 23(90), 31–50. doi:10.1174/021037000760087955
45.
SinhaC. (1992). Vygotsky, internalization and evolution. In MayerR. (Ed.), Internalization: Conceptual issues and methodological problems (pp. 125–146). Utrech: ISOR.
46.
SpelkeE. S. (2000). Core knowledge. American Psychologist, 55, 1233–1243. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1233
47.
ThelenE. (2000). Grounded in the world: Developmental origins of the embodied mind. Infancy, 1, 3–28. doi:10.1207/S15327078IN0101_02
48.
TolchinskyL. (2003). The cradle of culture and what children know about writing and numbers before being taught. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
VygotskyL. S. (1979). Consciousness as a problem in the psychology of behaviour. Soviet Psychology, 17, 3–35.
50.
VygotskyL. S. (1931/1995). Historia del desarrollo de las funciones psíquicas superiors[History of the development of higher mental functions]. In ÁlvarezA.RíoP. Del (Eds.), L. S. Obras escogidas, volume III[L. S. Vygoyski. Selected Works, volume III] (pp. 11–340). Madrid: Aprendizaje Visor.
51.
WallonH. (1942). De l’acte à la pensée[From action to thought]. Paris: Flamarion.
52.
WertschJ. V. (1988). Vygotsky y la formación social de la mente[Vygotsky and the social formation of mind]. Barcelona: Paidós (Original English edition in 1985).
53.
WertschJ. V. (1991). Voices of mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.