En este artículo se exponen las estrategias de segunda generación que, dentro del ámbito de investigación de la Psicología Diferencial Cognosátiva, se consideran más representativas, a saber: el análisis componencial, el análisis factorial confirmatorio, y el análisis de rasgo latente. Estas estrategias de investigación en Psicología Diferencial Cognoscitiva tienen, en contraste con las estrategias de primera generación, un dominio de aplicación más amplio. Tanto las estrategias de primera como las de segunda generación pueden ser utilizadas conjuntamente, siempre de acuerdo a las consideraáones teóricas de interés que trate de analizar el investigador.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BelmontJ. M.ButterfieldE. C. (1982): To secure transfer of training, instruct self-management skills. En DettermanD. K.SternbergR. J.How and how much can intelligence be increased?Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
2.
CarrollJ. B. (1979): How shall we study individual differences in cognitive abilities? Methodological and theoretical perspectives. En SternbergR. J.DettermanD. K.Human intelligence: perspectives on its theory and measurement.Norwood, N.J.: Ables Publishing Corporation.
3.
CronbachL. J. (1957): The two disciplines of scientific psychology.American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.
4.
CronbachL.J. (1975): Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology.American Psychologist, 30, 116–127.
5.
DondersF. C. (1868): La vitesse des actes psychiques. Archives Néerlandaises.
6.
EkstromR. B.FrenchJ. W.HarmanH. H.DermanD. (1976): Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests.Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
EmbretsonS. (1984): A general latent trait model for response processes.Psychometrika, 49, 175–186.
9.
EmbretsonS. (1985): Intelligence and its measurement: extending contemporary theory to existing tests. En ReynoldsC. R.WilsonV. L.Methodological and statistical advances in the studies of individual differences.Nueva York: Plenum Press.
10.
EmbretsonS.CurtrightC. (1982): Problem structure and response format in solving verbal analogies. Informe técnico No. NIE-82–2 para el National Institute of Education, Lawrence, Kansas: Universidad de Kansas.
11.
EmbretsonS.SchneiderL.OthR. (1985): Multiple processing strategies and the construct validity of verbal reasoning test. Journal of Educational Measurement.
12.
FischerG. H. (1973): The linear logistic model as an instrument in educational research.Acta Psychologica, 37, 359–374.
13.
FrederiksenJ. R. (1978): A chronometric study of component skills in reading. Cambridge, MA: Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc. (Informe n.o 3757, Informe técnico n.o 2, ONR Contract N00014–76-C-0461, NR 154 386).
14.
GuyoteM. J.SternbergR. J. (1981): A transitive-chain theory of syllogistic reasoning.Cognitive Psychology, 13, 461–525.
15.
HertzogC. (1985): Applications of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of intelligence. En DettermanD. K. (comp.): Current topics in human intelligence, vol. 1: Researsch metholodogy.Nueva Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
16.
HuntE.FrostN.LunneborgC. (1973): Individual differences in cognition: a new approach to intelligence. En BowerC. (comp.): Advances in learning and motivation, vol. 7.Nueva York: Academic Press.
17.
JoreskogK. G. (1974): Analyzing psychological data by structural analysis of covariance matrices. En KrautzD. H.AtkinsonR. C.LuceR. D.SuppesP.Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology, vol. 2.San Francisco: CA, Freeman.
18.
Juan EspinosaM.ColomR. (1989): La Investigación en Psicología Diferencial Cognoscitiva: estrategias de primera generación. Estudios de Psicología.
19.
Juan EspinosaM.ColomR.(en prensa): Aproximaciones a una Psicología Diferencial Cognoscitiva.Cognitiva.
20.
McconaghyJ.KlrbyN. H. (1986): Analogical reasoning and ability level: An examination of R. J. Sternberg's componential method. Intelligence.
21.
McconaghyJ.KirbyN. H. (1987): Using the componential method to train mentaly retarded individual to solve analogies.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 92(1), 12–23.
22.
PellegrinoJ.GlaserR. (1980): Components of inductive reasoning. En SnowR.FedericoP. A.MontagueW. E. (Comps.) Aptitude, learning and instruction: cognitive process analyses of aptitude, vol. 1.Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
23.
RaschG. (1960): Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests.Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
24.
ScheiblechnerH. (1972): Learning and solving of complex mental problems.Zeitschrift Für Experimentelle Angewandte Psychologie, 19, 476–506.
25.
SnowR. (1979): Theory and method for research on aptitude Processes. En SternbergR.J.DettermanD. K.Human intelligence: Perspectives on its theory and measurement. Nueva Jersey, Ablex Publishing Corporation.
26.
SternbergR. J. (1977 a): Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: the componential analysis of human abilities. Nueva Jersey: LEA.
SternbergR.J. (1979): The nature of mental abilities.American Psychologist, 34, 214–130.
29.
SternbergR.J. (1980 a): Representation and Pocess in linear syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 119–159.
30.
SternbergR. J. (1980 b): Sketch of a componential sub theory of human intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 573–614.
31.
SternbergR.J. (1985): Componential analysis: a recipe. En DettermanD. K. (comp.): Current topics in human intelligence, vol. 1: Research methodology.Nueva Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
32.
SternbergR. J.GardnerM. K. (1983): Unities in inductive reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 80–116.
33.
SternbergR. J.NigroG. (1980): Developmental patterns in the solution of verbal analogies.Child Development, 51, 27–38.
34.
SternbergR. J.RifkinB. (1979): The development of analogical reasoning processes.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27, 195–232.
35.
SternbergR. J.TurnerM. E. (1981): Components of syllogistic reasoning.Acta Psychologica, 47, 245–265.
36.
ThurstoneL. L., (1947): Multiple factor analysis. Chicago, Il: University of Chicago Press.
37.
VernonP. E. (1972): The distinctiveness of field independence.Journal of Personality, 40, 366–391.
38.
WhitelyS. (1973): Types of relationships in reasoning by analogy. Tesis doctoral inédita. Minnesota: Universidad de Minnesota.
39.
WhitelyS. (1981): Measuring aptitude processes with multicomponent latent trait models.Journal of Educational Measurement, 18, 67–84.
40.
WhitelyS.BarnesG. M. (1979): The implications of processing events sequences for theories of analogical reasoning.Memory and Cognition, 7, 323–331.
41.
WhitelyS.CurtrightC. A. (1980): Perfomance and stimulus complexity norms for verbal analogy test items. Informe Técnico NIE-80–4 para el National Institute of Education, Lawrence, Kansas: Universidad de Kansas.
42.
WhitelyS.NiehK. (1981): Program Mulrticomp. Manuscrito inédito. Lawrence, Kansas: Universidad de Kansas.
43.
WldigerT. A.KnudsonR. M.OrerL. G. (1980): Convergent and discriminant validity of measures of cognitive styles and abilities.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 116–129.
