Tras la revisión bibliográfica de las medidas utilizadas generalmente para evaluar la morfología de la escritura y su desarrollo, se realiza un estudio experimental de la evolución de los distintos aspectos morfológicos de la escritura a lo largo de varios cursos, has medidas utilizadas, tanto generales como especificas, se organizan en base a tres características morfológicas: la productividad, la complejidad y la precisión. Se evalúan muestras de escritura realizadas por 380 sujetos de 2.°, 4. °, 6.° y 8.° de EGB y 2.° de BUP. Se estudian las diferencias entre los grupos y la bondad de ajuste de los datos a un modelo lineal y a un modelo logarítmico. Por último se expone la utilidad de dicho estudio cara a la evaluación de la morfología y la construcción de los modelos y sistemas de evaluación de la escritura.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenG. J.«Using a personalized system of instruction to improve the writing skills of undergraduates».Teaching of Psychology, 1984, 11(2), abril 1984.
2.
AndersonK. «Primary Trait Scoring: new approach to evaluating ESL compositions». Artículo presentado en la XV Convención Anual TESOL, Detroit, 3–8 de marzo de 1981.
3.
AzevedoM. M.«The interlanguage of advanced learners: an error analyses of graduate student's spanish».IRAL, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, agosto 1980, 18(3), 217–227.
4.
BaggettR. C. «A transformational analysis of syntax in tenthgrade writing». Syracuse, Syracuse University, 1977.
5.
BairdL. O. «Functional spelling study and written composition of fifth and third grade students». Provo, Brigham Young University, 1983.
6.
BarnesW. G. W. «The developmental acquisition of silent letters and orthographic images in english spelling». Charlottesville, University of Virginia, 1982.
7.
BensonN. L. «The effects of peer feedback during the writing process on writing performance, revision behavior, and attitude toward writing». Boulder, University of Colorado at Boulder, 1979.
8.
BensonB. A. «A quantitative analysis of language structures in compositions written by first and second language learners». Lawrence, Univ. of Kansas, 1980.
9.
BermanJ. P.SmithC. M. «The Winthrop College Writing Skills Program: a model for College School Cooperation». Artículo presentado en la Reunión Anual de la Conferencia sobre Comunicación y Composición en el College. Washington, 13–15 de marzo de 1980.
10.
BesboarB. B.«The condition of student writing».American Education, 1976, 12(2), 19–22.
11.
BiggsJ. B.CollisK. F.«The psychological structure of creative writing».The Australian Journal of Education, 1982, 26(1), 59–70.
12.
BippusA. C. M. «The relationship of the quality of student's written language, productivity of writing, and reading comprehension in grade four and six». Charlottesville, University of Virginia, 1977.
13.
BlinnJ. R. «A comparison of selected writing skills of high school journalism and non-journalism students». Athens, Ohio University, 1982.
14.
BodkinA. Z. «Children's writing: selected differences by sex, grade level, and socioeconomic status». Buffalo, State University at Buffalo, 1978.
15.
BondsL..: «The effects of positive and negative comments on children's creative writing». 1980.
16.
BrelandH.GriswoldP. A.«Use of a performance test as a criterion in a differential validity study».Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982, 75(5), 713–721.
17.
BriganceA.Brigance Diagnostic Inventory of Basic Skills. Curriculum Associates, Inc.; 1976.
18.
BrinkhamE.BrügelmannH.Deutung von Rechtschreibfehlern. Faude-Verlag, 1982.
19.
BrownR.«National Assements of writing ability». EnFrederiksenDominicWriting: the nature, development and teaching of written communication.Hillsdale, Erlbaum, 1981.
20.
BrügelmannH.«Erkennen und fördern, was Kinder schon können. Zur Bedeutung naiver Erfahrungen mit Schrift für das Lese und Schreibenlernen». EnBergkMeiersK.Schulanfang ohne Fibeltrott.Bad Heilbrunn, Klinkhardt; en preparación.
21.
BrunoD. D. «The writing process method versus the traditional textbook—Worksheet method in the teaching of composition skills to third, fourth, and fifth grade pupils». Boulder, University of Colorado at Boulder, 1983.
22.
BurnhillPHartleyJ.DaviesL.«Lided paper, legibility and creativity». EnHartleyJ.The psychology of written communication. Selected Readings. Londres, Kogan Page, 1980.
23.
BurnleyJ. N. «A comparasion of three aspects of written expression of learning disabled and non-learning disabled fourth and fifth grade students». Durkham, Duke University, 1982.
24.
BushnerD. E. «The relationship between the reading comprehension ability of seventh and eighth grade subjects and the syntatic complexity of their written language». Boston, Boston University School of Education, 1979.
25.
CampleseD. A.MayoJ. A.«How to improve the quality of student writing—the colleague swap».Teaching of Psychology, 1982, 9(2), 122–123.
26.
ChaterjeeJ. B. «A comparative analysis of syntatic density and vocabulary richness in written language of learning-abled and learning-disabled children at third and fifth grade levels». San Francisco, University of San Francisco, 1983.
27.
CicciR.«Written language disorders».Bulletin of the Orton Society, 1980, 30, 240–251.
28.
ColemanD. «The effects of pupil use of a creative writing scale as an evaluative and instructional tool by primary gifted students». Manhattan, Kansas State University, 1981.
29.
CollinsJ. L.WilliamsonM. M.«Spoken language and semantic abbreviation in writing».Research in the Teaching of English, 1981, 15, 23–25.
30.
CollinsJ. «Spoken language and the development of writing abilities». Artículo presentado en la Reunión Anual de la Conferencia sobre Comunicación y Composición en el College. Dallas, 26–28 de marzo de 1981.
31.
ConryR.JeroskiSH.: The British Columbia Assessment of Written Expression: general report. Vancouver, British Columbia University, 1980.
32.
CookL.«Misspelling analysis in dyslexia: observation of development strategy shifts».Bulletin of the Orton Society, 1981, 31, 123–134.
33.
CooperOdellEvaluating writing: describing, measuring, judging. Urbana, National Council of Teachers of English, 1977.
34.
CowardinJ. H. «Modifying the syntactical matturity of compositional writing by academically handicapped secondary students». Dayton, The Ohio State University, 1978.
35.
CritchleyM.«Dislexia evolutiva específica: trastornos de la escritura». EnLennebergLennebergFundamentos del desarrollo del lenguaje.Madrid, Alianza Universidad, 1982, 598–599.
36.
CrockerL..: «Predicting children's writing performance from Standarized Achievement Test». Artículo presentado en la Reunión Anual del Consejo Nacional sobre la Medida en Educación. San Francisco, 8–12 de abril de 1979.
37.
CroftA. C.«Do spelling tests measure the ability to spell?»Educational Measurement.1982, 42(3), 715–723.
38.
CromerR. F.«Spontaneus spelling by language—disordered children». EnFrithU.Cognitive Process in Spelling. Londres, Academic Press, 1980.
39.
Della-PianaG.OdellL.CooperCH.EndoG.«The writing skills decline: So what?»Educational Technology.1976, 16(7), 30–39.
40.
DilworthC. B. «Predilection in the assessment of writing». Artículo presentado en la Reunión Anual de la Conferencia sobre Comunicación y Composición en el College. Dallas, 26–28, 1981.
41.
Di-Comp Diagnostic System for Teaching Composition for Grades 10–14, 1977.
42.
DinneenD. I. «The legibility and rate of production of italic and non-italic handwriting in first and second grade students». Pullman, Washington State University, 1978.
43.
DoutriauxF.LepezR.«Test de niveau d'orthographe».Rev. Psy. App., 1980, 30(3), 247.
44.
EdelskyC.«Writing in a bilingual program: the relation of L1 and L2 texts».Tesol Quarterly, 1982, 16(2), 211.
45.
EderS. «The effect of cursive-writing models on spelling achievement». Nueva York, Columbia University Teachers College, 1983.
46.
EdmianstonR. K. «An investigation of the interrelationships of selected aspects of oral and written language». Austin, University of Texas, 1980.
47.
EllisA. W. «Reading, writing, and dyslexia: a cognitive analysis». Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1984.
48.
FordC. K. «Determing the significant errors in foreign student compositions by means of a composition cheklist». Philadelphia, Temple University, 1982.
49.
FriedmanM.FowlerE. «Assessing elementary Student's writing skills». Artículo presentado en la Reunión Anual de la Asociación Americana para la Investigación en Educación. San Francisco, 8–12 de abril de 1979.
50.
GoldV. Y. «The effect of an experimental program involving acquisition of phoneme-grapheme relationships incorporating criterion—referenced tests with evaluative feedback upon the spelling performance of third-grade pupils». Los Angeles, University of Southern California.
51.
GoldingJ. A. «Construction, analysis and use of an objective measuring instrument in a comparison of essays written by students of individualized packet programs and traditional classroom methods». Detroit, Wayne State University, 1978.
52.
GouldJ. D.BoiesST.J.«Writing, dictating and speaking letters». EnHartleyJ.The Psychology of written communication. Selected readings. Londres, Kogan, 1980.
53.
GreenbergK. L. «The effects of variations in essay questions on the writing performance of college freshmen». Nueva York, New York University, 1981.
54.
GrobeC.«Syntactic Maturity, mechanics, and vocabulary as predictors of quality ratings».Research in the Teaching of English, febrero 1981, 15(1), 75–85.
55.
GroffP.«Word familiarity and spelling difficulty»Educational Research.1984, 26(1), 33–35.
56.
GundlachR. A.«On the nature and development of children's writing». EnFrederiksenC.DominicJ.Writing: The nature, development and teaching of written communication.Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1981.
57.
HallJ.Evaluating and improving written expression. Londres, Allyn & Bacon, 1981.
58.
HammilD.LarsenS.Test of written language (TOWL).Austin, Pro-Ed., 1978.
59.
HaisleyG. E. «A comparasion of the written language of normal, educable mentally retarded, learning disabled, and emotionally disturbed school age children». Greely, University of Northern Colorado, 1978.
60.
HolladayS. A. «Two approaches to freshman composition in the two-year college». Pittsburgh, Carnegie-Mellon University, 1983.
61.
HotopfN.«Slips of the Pen». EnFrithU.Cognitive Processes in Spelling. Londres, Academic Press, 1980.
62.
HouseE. B.HouseW. J. «Some similarities and differences between compositions written by remedial college freshmen». Artículo presentado en la Reunión Anual de la Conferencia sobre Comunicación y Composición en el College. Washington, 13–15 de marzo de 1980.
63.
HurlowM. L. «Writing mode and linguistic insecurity». Dayton, The Ohio State University, 1979.
64.
HyslopN. B. «A study to test the effects od daily writing upon students' skills in explanatory discourse at the eleventh grade level». Bloomington, Indiana University, 1983.
65.
JohnsonM. «Assesment results for student writing samples». Artículo presentado en la Reunión Anual del Consejo Nacional de Profesores de Inglés. San Francisco, 22–24 de noviembre de 1979.
66.
KarpenkoN. P.PodolskiA. S.«La formación de la atención y la corrección de las disgrafías».Infancia y Aprendizaje, 1979, 7.
67.
KerekA.DaikerD.MorenbergM.«Sentence combining and college composition».Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1980, 51(3), 1059–1157.
68.
KheredM. O. H. «Measuring the syntatic maturity in the written english of arab students at four proficiency levels and establishing en EFL index of development». Lawrence, University of Kansas, 1983.
69.
KimI. H. «An analysis of errors in english compbsitions written by selected korean and thai students: its implications for teaching writing in EFL classrooms». Detroit, Wayne State University, 1983.
70.
KommersM. S.SullivanM. D.«Written language skills of children with cleft palate».The Cleft Palate Journal, 1979, 16(1), 81–85.
71.
KoneckiL. R. C.Adult spelling performance in different writing contexts.Chicago, The University of Chicago, 1975.
72.
LarsenR.HammilD.Test of Written Spelling (TWS). San Rafael, Academic Therapy Publications, 1976.
73.
LevineS. ST.: The effect of transformational sentence-combining exercises on the reading comprehension and written composition in third-grade children. Hempstead, Hofstra University, 1976.
74.
McaffeD. C.Effect of sentence-combining instruction on the reading and writing achievement of fifth grade children in a suburban school district. Denton, Texas Woman's University, 1980.
75.
MiocinovicL.«Analysis of the written».Neurolinguistics.1976, 5, 179.
76.
MoatsL. C.«A comparasion of the spelling errors of older dyslexic and second-grade normal children».Annals of Dislexia, 1983, 33, 121–140.
77.
MoranM. R.«Performance of learning disabled and low achieving secondary students on formal features of a paragraph-writing task».Learning Disabilty Quarterly, 1981, 4(3), 271–280.
78.
MorrisN. T.CrumpW. D.«Syntactic and vocabulary development in the written language of learning disabled and non-learning disabled students at four age levels».Learning Disability Quarterly, 1982, 5(2), 163–172.
79.
MyklebustH. R.Pictory Story Language Test. Nueva York, Grune y Stratton, 1965.
80.
NauclerK.«Connection between spoken and written language evidence from three investigations on normal pathological written performance».Journal of Pragmatics, 1983, 7(5) 595–602.
81.
NeyJ. W.«The hazards of the course: sentence combining in freshman english».The english record, 1976, 27, 70–77.
82.
NeyJ. M. «Cognitive styles and miscue analysis of reading and writing». Artículo presentado en la Conferencia Internacional Anual sobre la Enseñanza del Inglés. Sydney, 17–22 de agosto, 1980.
83.
PlasseL. A. «The influence of audience on the assessment of student writing». Storrs, The University of Connecticut, 1981.
84.
PophamW. J.The essentials of criterion-referenced measurement.1977.
85.
PoplinM. S..: «A comparasion of components of written expression abilities in learning disabled and non-learning disabled students at three grade levels», Learning Disability Quarterly, 1980, 3(4), 46–53.
86.
PraterD. L. «The construction and validation of a criterion-referenced test in basic writing skills». Berkeley, University of California, 1978.
87.
PraterD.PadiaW. «Developing parallel holistic and analitic scoring guides for assessing elementary writing samples». Artículo presentado en la Reunión Anual de la Asociación de Investigacion Educativa del Suroeste. San Antonio, febrero 1980.
88.
RabianskiN. «Spelling: easing the student's anxiety and improving his/her skills». Artículo presentado en la Reunión Anual de la Asociación de los Centros de Escritura. Clarion, 8 de mayo de 1981.
89.
RobertsB.The New Brunswick Writing Assessment Program: The language at growth. Fredericton, New Brunswick Departement of Education, 1979.
90.
RobertsD. H.Individualized instruction in Southern West Virginia Colleges: a study of acquisition of writing fluency. Indiana, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 1982.
91.
RubinD. L.«Adapting syntax in writing to varying audiences as a function of age and social cognitive ability».Journal of Child Language, 1982, 9(2), 497–510.
92.
SantanaB.La evolución de la escritura: estudio de los aspectos morfológicos.Madrid, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 1983.
93.
SantanaB.«Estudio de las relaciones entre las medidas de los aspectos morfológicos de la escritura».Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, en prensa. Madrid, 1985.
94.
SchifskyJ. P.Toward a description of extressive discourse: A stylistic analysis of the writing of 13 and 17 year-olds on a National Assessment Exercise. Iowa, The University of Iowa, 1981.
95.
ShanaganT. E.A canonical correlational analysis of the reading-writing relationship: an exploratory investigation. Newark, University of Delaware, 1980.
96.
ShaughnessyM.Errors and Expectations: A guide for the teacher of basic writing.Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1977.
97.
ShuyR.«A holistic view of language».Reserch in the Teaching of English, 11981, 15, 101–112.
98.
SlegelmanL. A.The evaluation of written products in school age students: techniques and developmental milestones.Austin, The University of Texas, 1982.
99.
SilvaC. M.A comparative study of the needs and concepts of individual students in a postsecondary remedial writing program. Dayton, The Ohio State University, 1977.
100.
SimmonsR. J.An analytical study of the relationsships of reading abilities and writing abilities of tenth grade students. Morgantown, The West Virginia University, 1977.
101.
SpandelV.StigginsR. J.Direct measures of writing skills: issues and applications. Portland, Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, 1981.
102.
StanleyG.WatsonM.«Comparison of writing and drawing performance of dyslexis boys».Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1980, 51, 776–778.
103.
StewardM. F.GrobeC. H.«Syntactic maturity, mechanics of writing and teachers'quality ratings».Research in the Teaching of English, 1979, 13(3), 207–215.
104.
StrawS. B.The effect of sentence-combining and sentence-reduction instruction on measures of syntantic fluency, reading comprehension, and listening comprehension in fourth grade students.Minneapolis, University of Minnesota, 1978.
105.
SussnaS.The development of a self-administered anlytic guide for use by graduate students for the improvement of writing and the evaluation of its assistance in improving writing skills in research papers. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, 1978.
106.
TempleCH.NatanR.BurrisN.The beginnigs of writing. Londres, Allyn y Bacon, 1982.
107.
TempleCH.NatanR.BurrisN.Test of everyday writing skills. California, McGraw-Hill, 1928.
108.
TempleCH.NatanR.BurrisN.Texas assement of basic skills (TABS).Austin, Texas Education Agency, 1980.
109.
ThomasD.DonlanD. «Correlations between holistic and quantitative methods of evaluating student writing, grades 4–12». Artículo presentado en la Reunión Anual de la Conferencia sobre la Educación del Inglés y de la Conferencia sobre el inglés en la Escuela Secundaria. Omaha, 27–28 de marzo de 1980.
110.
ToroJ.CerveraM.TALE: Test de analisis de lecto-escritura. Madrid, Visor-Aprendizaje, 1984.
111.
TuanaE..: «Diez años de investigaciones ortográficas». Lectura y Vida, 1980, 1(2), 16–19.
112.
WeinerE. S.«Diagnostic evaluation of writing skills».Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980, 13(1), 43–48.
113.
WitteS. P.SodowskyR. «Syntactic Maturity in the writing of college frehmen». Artículo presentado en la Reunión Anual de la Conferencia sobre Comunicación y Composición en el College. Denver, 30 de marzo-i de abril de 1978.
114.
TuanaE. J. DESIDERI DE CASTIGLIONI B.; SERRATO DE PIACENZA, D.; DE ANTUNEZ, P. M.; CASAS G.; PIEDRA DE MORATIO, M.; SCAMAROTTI, S., y LLUCH DE PINTOS, E.: «Desarrollo del lenguaje escrito de los escolares: Estudio experimental del test “Cuento sobre una lámina».Boletín del Instituto Americano del Niño.1971, 45(179), 564–640.
115.
WeinerE. S.«Diagnostic evaluation of writing skills».Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980, 13(1), 43–48.
116.
WitteS. P.SodowskyR. «Syntactic Maturity in the writing on college freshmen». Artículo presentado en la Reunión Anual de la Conferencia sobre Comunicación y Composición en el College. Denver, 30 de marzo-i de abril de 1978.
