Con el fin de acumular información sobre las características definitorias del hecho diferencial canario, se llevaron a cabo tres investigaciones en el marco general de las actitudes. En todas ellas se tomaron variables sociológicas y geográficas como base de los contrastes, utilizando en todos los casos muestras representativas dé la población estudio.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BogardusE.«Measuring Social distance», Journal of applied Sociology, 9, 299–308. 1925.
2.
BorgattaE.«An error ratio for scalogram analysis».Public opinion Quarterly, 19, 96–100. 1955.
3.
BrownR.Social psychology, Nueva York: Free Press (hay traducción castellana en S. XXI), 1965.
4.
BrunerJ.GoodmanC.«Valve and need as organizing factores in perception», Journal of abnormal and social psychology.42, 33–441947.
5.
BrunerJ.PerlmutterH.«Compatriot and foreigner: A study of impression formation in three countries», Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 55, 253–260. 1957.
6.
CantorN.MischelW.«Prototypes in person perception», EnBerkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 12, Nueva York: Academia Press, 1979.
7.
CrullS.BrutonB. «Bogardus social distance in the 1970 s», Sociology and Social Research, 63, 771–783. 1975.
8.
DeauxK.«A perspective on the attribution process», enHarveyIckesKidd (Eds.) New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1). Nueva York: Erlbaum, 1976.
9.
EdwardA.«Four dimensions in political stereotypes», Journal of abnormal and Social Psycholog), 35, 566–572. 1940.
10.
EhrlichH.RinehartJ.«A brief report on the methodology of stereotype research», Social forces, 43, 564–575, 1965
11.
EysenckH.CrownS.«National stereotypes: An experimental and methodological study», International Journal of opinion and attitude Research, 2, 26–29. 1948.
12.
GuttmanL.«The Cornell technique for scale and intensity analysis», Educational and Psychological measurement, 247–280. (Hay trad, en SUMMERS: medición de actitudes, Ed. Trillas). 1947.
13.
HamiltonD.«A cognitive-Attributional analysis of stereotyping», enBerkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 12. Nueva York: Academic Press, 1979.
14.
KatzD.BralyK.«Racial stereotypes in one hundred college students», Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 28, 280–290. 1933.
15.
KatzD.BralyK.«Racial prejudice and racial stereotypes», Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 30, 175–193, 1935.
16.
KelvinP.The bases of social behavior. An Approach in terms of order and valve.Londres: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1972.
17.
LippmanW.Public Opinion, Harcourt, Brace, N. York. 1922.
18.
MenzelH.«A view coefficient for scalogram analysis», Public opinion Quarterly, 17, 268–280. 1953.
19.
PinillosJ.«Estereotipos raciales de universitarios españoles, ingleses y norteamericanos», Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 56, 779–797. 1960.
20.
RODRÍGUEZ SANABRA: «Estereotipos regionales españoles», Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 68–69, 299–307. 1963.
RoschE.«Cognitive representations of semantic catégories», Journal of experimental psychology general, 104, 192–233. 1975.
23.
RoschE.«Principles of categorization», enRoschLloyd (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization, Nueva York: Wiley and sons, 1978.
24.
SantoroE.«Estereotipos nacionales en habitantes de una zona marginal de Caracas», enMarinG. (Ed.), La psicologia social en Latinoamérica, Méjico: Trillas, 1975.
25.
TajfelH.«Social and cultural factors in perception», en Lindzey y Aronson, Handbook of social Psychology, Vol. 3. Massachussetts: Addison Wesley, 1969.
26.
TajfelH.«La categorization social», en Moscovici, Introducción a la psicología social, Barcelona: Planeta, 1975.
27.
TajfelH.BillingM.BundyR.FlamentC.«Social categorization and intergroup behavior, European Journal of social Psychology, 1, 149–178. 1971.
28.
VinackeW.«Stereotypes as social concepts», Journal of social Psychology, 46, 229–243. 1957.
29.
WilderD.AllenV.«Group membership and preference for information about others, Personality and social psychology Bulletin, 4, 106–110. 1978.
