Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-11
Marbles,puzzles and focal point. ‘Theory of mind’ in the psychology of Ángel Rivière ( Canicas,puzles y focos. La ‘teoría de la mente’ en la Psicología de Ángel Rivière )
The ‘theory of mind’ construct is presented, pointing out its place in Rivière’s conceptual approaches to psychological development, and in particular to the way of understanding autism. Next, the evolution of the theory of mind is briefly analysed, finally pointing out some implications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baron CohenS. (2000). Theory of mind and autism. A fifteen-year review. In CohenS. B.Tager-FlusbergH.CohenD. (Eds.), Understanding other minds. Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience (pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
Baron CohenS.LeslieA.FrithU. (1985). Does the autistic child have a theory of mind?Cognition, 2, 37–46.
3.
Baron-CohenS. (2009). The empathizing-systemizing theory of autism: Implications for education. Tizard Learning Disability Review, 14, 4–13.
4.
Baron-CohenS. (2017). Neurodiversity. A revolutionary concept for autism and psychiatry. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58, 744–747.
5.
Baron-CohenS.LombardoM.Tager-FlusbergH. (2013). Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental social neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
BenassiJ.RodríguezC. (2020). The genesis of shared reference. A pragmatic perspective of autism (Génesis de la referencia compartida. Una mirada pragmática sobre el autismo). Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 43. doi:10.1080/02103702.2020.1814600
7.
CamposR. (2009). Construyendo mentes: Desarrollo de la comprensión de estados mentales en la ontogénesis típica y en niños con síndrome de Down(Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
8.
CamposR. (2020). Like mermaids or centaurs: psychological functions that are constructed through interaction (Como sirenas o centauros: funciones psicológicas que se construyen en interacción). Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 43. doi:10.1080/02103702.2020.1810942
9.
GweonH.Dodell‐FederD.BedniM.SaxeR. (2012). The performance of the theory of mind in children correlates with the functional specialization of a region of the brain to think about thoughts. Child Development, 83, 1853–1868.
10.
HappéF. (1994). Autism: An introduction to psychological theory. London: University College London Press. (Ed. cast. Madrid: Alianza, 2007).
11.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (2009). Nativism versus neoroconstructivm: Rethinking the study of developmental disorders. Developmental Psychology, 45, 56–63.
12.
LeslieA.GaemanT. (2010). Handbook of theory of mind. Hove: Psychology Press.
13.
LeudarI.CostallA. (Eds.). (2009). Against theory of mind. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
MiltonD. (2012). On the ontological status of autism: The ‘double empathy problem’. Disability & Society, 27, 883–887.
15.
NúñezM., & Gómez, J.-C. (2020). Early interaction, communication and the origins of autism: Far-reaching insights by Ángel Rivière (Interacción temprana, comunicación y los orígenes del autismo: la visión con largo alcance de Ángel Rivière). Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 43. doi:10.1080/02103702.2020.1811542
16.
PremackD.WoodruffG. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a “theory of mind”?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 512–526.
RivièreÁ. (1991). Objetos con mente. Madrid: Alianza.
19.
RivièreÁ. (1993). Las multitudes de la mente. Anuario de Psicología, 56, 112–144.
20.
RivièreÁ. (1997). Tratamiento del autismo como trastorno del desarrollo. In RivièreÁ.MartosJ. (Eds.), El tratamiento del autismo: Nuevas perspectivas (pp. 23–60). Madrid: APNA-IMSERSO.
21.
RivièreÁ. (2001). ¿Qué nos pediría un autista?Siglo Cero: Revista Española sobre Discapacidad Intelectual, 32, 40–41.
22.
RivièreÁ. (2003a). Educación y modelos de desarrollo. In BelinchónM.RosaA.MarichalarI.SotilloM. (Eds.), Ángel Rivière. Obras escogidas. Volumen III (pp. 243–284). Madrid: Ed. Médica-Panamericana.
23.
RivièreÁ. (2003b). Desarrollo y educación: El papel de la educación en el ‘diseño’ del desarrollo humano. In BelinchónM.RosaA.MarichalarI.SotilloM. (Eds.), Ángel Rivière. Obras escogidas. Volumen III (pp. 203–242). Madrid: Ed. Médica-Panamericana.
24.
RivièreÁ.CastellanosJ. L. (1986). Autismo y Teoría de la mente. Comunicación presentada en el IV Congreso Nacional de Terapeutas de Autismo. Valladolid. In BelinchónM.RosaA.MarichalarI.SotilloM. (Eds.) (2003), Ángel Rivière. Obras escogidas. Volumen II (pp. 143–163). Madrid: Ed. Médica-Panamericana.
25.
RivièreÁ.NúñezM. (1996). La mirada mental. Buenos Aires: Aique.
26.
RivièreÁ.SotilloM. (1999). Comunicazione, sospensione e semiosi umana: Le originedella pratica e della comprensione enterpersonali. Ricerche di sociología e psicogia della comunicazione, 1, 45–76.
27.
SabbaghM.BowmanL.EvraireL.ItoJ. (2009). Neurodevelopmental correlates of theory of minf in preschool children. Child Devdelopment, 80, 1147–1162.
28.
Tager-FlusbergH. (2001). A re-examination of the Theory of Mind hypothesis of autism. In BurackJ.CharmanT.YirmiyaN.ZelazoP. (Eds.), Development of autism. Perspectives from the theory and research (pp. 173–193). Londron: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Tager-FlusbergH. (2003). Exploring the relationship between theory of mind and social-communicative functioning in children with autism. In RepacholiB.SlaughterV. (Eds.), Individual differences in theory of mind. Implications for typical and atypical development (pp. 197–212). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
30.
WellmanH. (2014). Making minds. How theory of mind develops. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
31.
WellmanH.CrosD.WatsonJ. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684.
32.
WellmanH.LiuD. (2004). Scaling the theory of mind tasks. Child Development, 75, 523–541.
33.
WimmerH.PernerJ. (1983). Belief about belief: Representation and the constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children‘s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.
