Restricted accessIntroductionFirst published online 2020-02
Introduction to the special issue ‘How adolescents read and learn on the Web: internal and external factors (Introducción al número especial ‘Cómo leen y aprenden los adolescentes en la red: factores internos y externos’)
The World Wide Web has become a major information resource for adolescents (i.e., 10–19 years of age), offering an unprecedented amount of information on virtually any topic. While the Web can potentially offer new learning opportunities, it also presents several challenges. Reading and learning on the Web requires a set of advanced literacy skills that adolescents do not necessarily possess and need to develop in order to effectively deal with the complexity of information encountered online. This special issue brings together five empirical articles and a discussion paper that examine internal and external factors that are beneficial (or detrimental) to adolescents’ reading and learning on the Web, and contribute to explaining how young learners develop complex literacy skills. Theoretically, the special issue contributes to the conceptualization of what researchers refer to as ‘multiple documents literacy’. In practice, it informs researchers and educators of emerging empirical results regarding adolescents’ information behaviour, as well as on instructional strategies that can be effective for developing adolescents’ literacy skills.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgostoD. E.Hughes‐HassellS. (2006). Toward a model of the everyday life information needs of urban teenagers, part 2: Empirical model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 1418–1426.
2.
AnmarkrudØ.BråtenI.StrømsøH. I. (2014). Multiple-documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 64–76.
3.
BehrensP.RathgebT. (2018). JIM-Studie 2018 – Jugend, Information, (Multi-)Media. Basisstudie zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-Jähriger in Deutschland. Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest.
4.
BråtenI.StadtlerM.SalmerónL. (2018). The role of sourcing in discourse comprehension. In SchoberM.RappD. N.BrittM. A. (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 141–166). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
5.
BrittM. A.RouetJ.-F.DurikA. (2018). Literacy beyond text comprehension. UK: Routledge.
6.
CroneE. A.KonijnE. A. (2018). Media use and brain development during adolescence. Nature Communications, 9, 588.
GoldmanS. R.Brand-GruwelS. (2018). Learning from multiple sources in a digital society. In FischerF.Hmelo-SilverC. E.GoldmanS. R.ReimannP. (Eds.), International handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 86–95). New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
HendriksF.KienhuesD.BrommeR. (2015). Measuring laypeople’s trust in experts in a digital age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI). PLoS One, 10, e0139309.
10.
KammererY.MeierN.StahlE. (2016). Fostering secondary-school students’ intertext model formation when reading a set of websites: The effectiveness of source prompts. Computers & Education, 102, 52–64.
11.
LivingstoneS.MascheroniG.StaksrudE. (2018). European research on children’s internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future. New Media & Society, 20, 1103–1122.
12.
Macedo‐RouetM.PotockiA.ScharrerL.RosC.StadtlerM.SalmerónL.RouetJ.-F. (2019). How good is this page? Benefits and limits of prompting on adolescents’ evaluation of web information quality. Reading Research Quarterly, 54, 299–321.
13.
MetzgerM. J.FlanaginA. J.MarkovA.GrossmanR.BulgerM. (2015). Believing the unbelievable: Understanding young people’s information literacy beliefs and practices in the United States. Journal of Children and Media, 9, 325–348.
14.
PaulJ.CerdánR.RouetJ.-F.StadtlerM. (2018). Exploring fourth graders’ sourcing skills / Un análisis de la capacidad de escrutinio sobre las fuentes de información de los estudiantes de cuarto grado. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 41, 536–580.
15.
PoratE.BlauI.BarakA. (2018). Measuring digital literacies: Junior high-school students perceived competencies versus actual performance. Computers & Education, 126, 23–36.
16.
RouetJ.-F.BrittM. A. (2011). Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension. In McCruddenM. T.MaglianoJ. P.SchrawG. (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 19–52). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
17.
RouetJ.-F.PotockiA. (2018). From reading comprehension to document literacy: Learning to search for, evaluate and integrate information across texts / De la lectura a la alfabetización documental: Aprender a buscar, evaluar e integrar información de diversos textos. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 41, 415–446.
18.
SalmerónL.CerdánR.NaumannJ. (2015). How adolescents navigate Wikipedia to answer questions / ¿Cómo navegan los adolescentes en Wikipedia para contestar preguntas?Infancia y Aprendizaje, 38, 435–471.
19.
SalmerónL.GarcíaA.Vidal-AbarcaE. (2018). The development of adolescents’‘ comprehension-based Internet reading skills. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 31–39.
20.
SbaffiL.RowleyJ. (2017). Trust and credibility in web-based health information: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19, e218.
SweetA. P.GuthrieJ. T. (1996). How children’s motivations relate to literacy development and instruction. The Reading Teacher, 49, 660.
23.
TaylorA.DalalH. A. (2014). Information literacy standards and the World Wide Web: Results from a student survey on evaluation of Internet information sources. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 19. Retrieved fromhttp://InformationR.net/ir/19-4/paper645.html
24.
ValenzuelaS.BachmannI.AguilarM. (2016). Socialized for news media use: How family communication, information-processing needs, and gratifications determine adolescents’ exposure to news. Communication Research, 46, 1095–1118.
