Communicative functions during the pre-grammatical stage: a case study / Las funciones comunicativas durante la etapa pregramatical: un estudio de caso
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2019
Communicative functions during the pre-grammatical stage: a case study / Las funciones comunicativas durante la etapa pregramatical: un estudio de caso
This study contributes empirical evidence regarding communicative functions in the pre-grammatical period. The aim was to explore these functions in child-adult dyadic interactions during what in language acquisition research has been called the two-word period. The study draws from the data corpus of a child 19–29 months old and the system of sign categories (gestures, non-verbal vocalizations, verbal vocalizations, uni- and bimodal compositions) developed by Rodríguez & Español. In order to study the communicative functions in this period, an observational code was developed in accordance with Strauss and Corbin’s Constant Comparative Method, which is suitable for encompassing the entire repertoire of a child’s sign use. The study in general allowed some functions absent in adult communication to be identified, and the qualitative analysis in particular revealed a use of semiotic resources that supports the idea of a cognitive processing structure common to gesture and word.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrénM. (2010). Children’s Gestures from 18 to 30 Months(Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, Lund.
2.
AustinJ. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3.
BaddeleyA. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communicational Disorders, 36, 189–208.
4.
BaddeleyA.GathercoleS.PapagnoC. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105, 158.
5.
BatesE.CamaioniL.VolterraV. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 21, 205–226.
6.
BrownR. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BrunerJ. (1981). The social context of language acquisition. Language and Communication, 1, 155–178.
8.
BühlerK. (1934). Teoría del lenguaje. (Trad. J. Marías). Madrid: Alianza.
9.
ButcherC.Goldin-MeadowS. (1993, March25-28). From one spoken word to two: Exploring the changing nature of gesture. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development (60th), New Orleans, LA. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01758.x
10.
ClarkR. A. (1978). The transition from action to gesture. In LockE. A. (Ed.), Action, gesture and symbol: The emergence of language (pp. 231–257). London: Academic Press.
11.
CochetH.VauclairJ. (2010). Pointing gestures produced by toddlers from 15 to 30 months. Infant Behavior and Development, 33, 431–441.
12.
CoseriuE. (2015). Geschichte der Sprachphilosophie. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.
13.
CraisE.DouglasD.CampbellC. (2004). The intersection of the development of gestures and intentionality. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 47, 678.
14.
DelgadoB.GómezJ. C.SarriáE. (2010). Funciones tempranas del gesto de señalar privado: La contemplación y la autorregulación a través del gesto de señalar. Acción Psicológica, 7, 59–70.
15.
DupertuisV.MoroC. (2016). Self-directed ostensions and mediations of the adult at the age of 8-, 12- and 16 months. Integrative Psychological Behavior, 50, 621–633.
16.
EspañolS. (2004). Cómo hacer cosas sin palabras. Madrid: Antonio Machado.
17.
EspañolS. (2006). Possible precursors of private speech: Deictic, symbolic and aesthetic self-directed gestures. In Montero García-CelayI. (Ed.), Current research trends in private speech. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Self-Regulatory Functions of Language (pp. 120–124). Madrid: Ediciones de la UAM.
18.
EspañolS.BordoniM.MartínezM.CamarasaR.CarreteroS. (2015). Forms of vitality play and symbolic play during the third year. Infant Behavior & Development, 40, 242–251.
19.
Esteve-GibertN.PrietoP. (2013). Prosody signals the emergence of intentional communication in the first year of life: Evidence from Catalan-babbling infants. Journal of Child Language, 40, 919–944.
20.
ForresterM. (2010). Emerging musicality during the preschool years. Psychology of Music, 38, 131–158.
21.
ForsterS.IaconoT. (2013). The nature of affect attunement used by disability support workers interacting with adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 58, 1105–1120.
22.
HallidayM. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean. London: Edward Arnold.
23.
Hernández PinaF. (1984). Teorías psicosociolingüísticas y su aplicación a la adquisición del español como lengua materna. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
24.
Hernández SampieriR.Fernández ColladoC.Baptista LucioP. (2006). Metodología de la investigación. México: McGraw-Hill.
25.
JakobsonR. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In SebeokT. A. (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge: MIT Press.
26.
JonssonC. O.ClintonD.FahrmanM.MazzagliaG.NovakS.SörhusK. (2001). How do mothers signal shared feeling-states to their infants? An investigation of affect attunement and imitation during the first year of life. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42, 377–381.
27.
Kerbrat-OrecchioniC. (1986). La enunciación. De la subjetividad en el lenguaje. Buenos Aires: Hachette (1980).
28.
López OrnatS. (1994). La metodología de la investigación longitudinal. In López OrnatS.FernándezA.GalloP.MariscalS. (Eds.), La adquisición de la lengua española (pp. 3–12). Madrid: Siglo XXI.
29.
López OrnatS.FernándezA.GalloP.MariscalS. (1994). La adquisición de la lengua española. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
30.
MartínezI. C.EspañolS.PérezD. (2018). The interactive origin and the aesthetic modelling of image-schemas and primary metaphors. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. doi:10.1007/s12124-018-9432-z
31.
McNeillD. (1992). Hand and mind. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
32.
McNeillD. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
33.
MerriamS. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34.
MurilloE.BelinchónM. (2013). Patrones comunicativos multimodales en la transición a las primeras palabras: Cambios en la coordinación de gestos y vocalizaciones. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 36, 473–487.
35.
PiagetJ. (1937/1988). La construcción de lo real en el niño. (Trad. R. Santamaría). Barcelona: Crítica.
36.
RivièreÁ.EspañolS. (2003). La suspensión como mecanismo de creación semiótica. Estudios de Psicología, 24, 261–275.
37.
RivièreA.SotilloM. (1999). Comunicación, suspensión y semiosis humana: Los orígenes de la práctica y de la comprensión interpersonales. In RivièreÁ. (Ed.), Obras escogidas (Vol. 3, pp. 181–202). Madrid: Panamericana.
38.
RodríguezC. (2007). El ojo de Dios no mira signos. Desarrollo temprano y semiótica. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 30, 343–374.
39.
RodríguezC. (2009). The ‘circumstances’ of gestures: Proto-interrogatives and private gestures. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 288–303.
40.
RodríguezC.Moreno-NúñezA.BasilioM.SosaN. (2015). Ostensive gestures come first: Their role in the beginning of shared reference. Cognitive Development, 36, 142–149.
41.
RodríguezF. G. (2017). La comunicación humana antes de la gramática (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires.
42.
RodríguezF. G.EspañolS. (2016). Bimodal compositions of gesture and vocalization at the beginning of verbal communication. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 39, 661–693.
43.
Romero AndonegiA.Etxebarria LejarretaA.de Pablo DelgadoI.Romero AndonegiA. (2017). Interrelación entre gestos y vocalizaciones en funciones comunicativas tempranas: Evidencias desde la lengua vasca. Revista Signos, 50(93), 96–123.
44.
Sarriá SánchezE. (1991). Observación de la comunicación intencional preverbal: Un sistema de codificación basado en el concepto de categoría natural. Psicothema, 3, 359–380.
45.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
46.
TomaselloM.CarpenterM.LiszkowskiU. (2007). A new look at infant pointing. Child Development, 78, 705–722.
47.
TrevarthenC. (1980). The foundations of intersubjectivity: Development of interpersonal and cooperative understanding in infants. In OlsonD. R. (Ed.), The social foundation of language and thought (pp. 316–342). New York, NY: Norton.
48.
ZlatevJ.AndrénM. (2009). Stages and transitions in children’s semiotic development. In ZlatevJ.Johansson FalckM.LundmarkC.AndrénM. (Eds.), Studies in language and cognition (pp. 380–401). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
