Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2015-09
Studying culture-cognition relations in collective practices of daily life: a research framework / El estudio de las relaciones cultura-cognición en las prácticas colectivas cotidianas: un modelo de investigación
This article sketches a framework for the study and analysis of culture-cognition relations that I present in my recent book, Cultural Development of Mathematical Ideas: Papua New Guinea Studies. Taking an historical approach, I focus on the reproduction and alteration of representational forms for number and the functions that representational forms serve in collective practices in and out of school. My key argument is that, in the context of their goal-directed communicative activities in collective practices in daily life, people unwittingly reproduce and alter representational forms and the functions that these forms serve. The process leads to continuities and discontinuities in form-function relations in communities over historical time. To provide evidence for this process and its role in the cultural development of ideas, I report selected findings from research conducted in 1978, 1980 and 2001 in Oksapmin communities; I focus on historical shifts in the forms and functions of the Oksapmin body part counting system over time. I then update that body of research with a sketch of a recent 2014 follow-up study. I close with reflections on the utility of my framework for the study of culture-cognition relations in other communities and on cognitive domains other than mathematics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BatesonG. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York, NY: Balantine Books.
2.
BrizuelaB. M. (2014). A first grade student’s exploration of variable and variable notation. Paper presented at the Jean Piaget Society Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
3.
CobbP.WoodT.YackelE.McNealB. (1992). Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 573–604. doi:10.3102/00028312029003573
4.
ColeM. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
DayK. (2014). The right to literacy and cultural change: Zulu adolescents in post-apartheid rural South Africa. Cognitive Development, 29, 81–94. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.12.001
6.
EarnestD. (2015). From number lines to graphs in the coordinate plane: investigating problem solving across mathematical representations. Cognition and Instruction, 33, 46–87. doi:10.1080/07370008.2014.994634.
7.
EngestromY. (2003). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In EngestromY.MiettinenR.PunamakiR.-L. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8.
GauvainM.MunroeR. L. (2012). Cultural change, human activity, and cognitive development. Human Development, 55, 205–228. doi:10.1159/000339451
9.
GearhartM.SaxeG. B. (2014). Differentiated instruction in shared mathematical contexts. Teaching Children Mathematics, 20, 426–435. doi:10.5951/teacchilmath.20.7.0426
10.
GreenfieldP. M. (2004). Weaving generations together: Evolving creativity in the Maya of Chiapas (1st ed.). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
11.
HornM. S. (2013). The role of cultural forms in tangible interaction design. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction. New York, NY.
12.
LagrangeJ. B.ErdoganE. O. (2009). Teachers’ emergent goals in spreadsheet-based lessons: Analyzing the complexity of technology integration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71, 65–84. doi:10.1007/s10649-008-9160-2
13.
Langer-OsunaJ. (2007). Toward a Framework for the Co-construction of Learning and Identity in the Mathematics Classroom. Paper presented at the Online papers of the Second Annual Socio-cultural Theory in Educational Research and Practice Conference: Theory, Identity and Learning. Manchester, UK.
14.
LeontievA. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In WertschJ. V. (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). New York, NY: Sharpe.
15.
NasirN. S. (2000a). “All money ain’t good money”: The development of emergent goals and strategic approaches in the game of dominoes. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61(6–A), 2186.
16.
NasirN. S. (2000b). “Points ain’t everything”: Emergent goals and average and percent understandings in the play of basketball among African American students. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 31, 283–305. doi:10.1525/aeq.2000.31.3.283
17.
NasirN. S.SaxeG. B. (2003). Ethnic and academic identities: A cultural practice perspective on emerging tensions and their management in the lives of minority students. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 14–18. doi:10.3102/0013189X032005014
18.
PiagetJ. (1963). The Origins of Intelligence in Children(M. Cook, Trans.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
19.
PiagetJ. (1970a). Genetic epistemology. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
20.
PiagetJ. (1970b). Piaget’s theory. In MussenP. H. (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (pp. 703–731). NY: Wiley.
21.
RogoffB. (2011). Developing destinies: A Mayan midwife and twon. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
SaxeG. B. (1981). Body parts as numerals: A developmental analysis of numeration among the Oksapmin in Papua New Guinea. Child Development, 52, 306–316.
23.
SaxeG. B. (1982). Developing forms of arithmetical thought among the Oksapmin of Papua New Guinea. Developmental Psychology, 18, 583–594. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.583
24.
SaxeG. B. (1985). Effects of schooling on arithmetical understanding: Studies with Oksapmin children in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 503–513. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.77.5.503
25.
SaxeG. B. (2012). Cultural development of mathematical ideas: Papua New Guinea studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
26.
SaxeG. B.de KirbyK.KangB.LeM.SchneiderA. (2015). Studying cognition through time in a classroom community: The interplay between “everyday” and “scientific concepts”. Human Development, 58, 5–44. doi:10.1159/000371560.
27.
SaxeG. B.de KirbyK.LeM.SitabkhanY.KangB. (2014). Understanding learning across lessons in classroom communities: A multi-leveled analytic approach. In Bikner-AhsbahsA.KnippingC.PresmegN. (Eds.), Doing (qualitative) research: Methodology and methods in mathematics education. New York, NY: Springer.
28.
SaxeG. B.DiakowR.GearhartM. (2013). Towards curricular coherence in integers and fractions: A Study of the efficacy of a lesson sequence that uses the number line as the principal representational context. ZDM, 45, 343–364. doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0466-2
29.
SfardA. (2008). Thinking as communicating. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
SitabkhanY. (2012). Economic ideas developed through young sellers’ successful selling strategies in Oaxaca, Mexico. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
31.
TaylorE. V. (2009). The purchasing practice of low-income students: The relationship to mathematical development. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 370–415. doi:10.1080/10508400903013462
32.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
VygotskyL. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
WertschJ. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
