The typeface used when students learn to read is largely ignored in educational practice and research. In this study, the reading of 115 Spanish first graders was assessed using texts written with six different typefaces, including a cursive script font. Significant differences were found in the number of decoding errors across the different typefaces, but not in fluency problems or number of words correctly read per minute. Our main conclusion is that the use of typefaces similar to handwriting in school texts for primary students who have already started to read is not justified.
De LangeR. W.EsterhuizenH. L.BeattyD. (1993). Performance differences between Times and Helvetica in a reading task. Electronic Publishing, 6, 241–248.
3.
DzierzawskaM. (2000). Los animales del jardín. Madrid: Edelvives.
4.
HartleyJ. (2004). Designing instructional and informational text. In JonassenD. H. (Ed.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (pp. 917–947). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
HughesL. E.WilkinsA. J. (2000). Typography in children’s reading schemes may be suboptimal: Evidence from measures of reading rate. Journal of Research in Reading, 23, 314–324. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.00126
6.
KatzirT.HershkoS.HalamishV. (2013). The Effect of font size on reading comprehension on second and fifth grade children: Bigger is not always better. Plos One, 8, 1–8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074061
7.
O’BrienB. A.MansfieldJ. S.LeggeG. E. (2005). The effect of print size on reading speed in dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 332–349. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2005.00273.x
8.
PereaM.PanaderoV.Moret-TatayC.GómezP. (2012). The effects of inter-letter spacing in visual-word recognition: Evidence with young normal readers and developmental dyslexics. Learning and Instruction, 22, 420–430. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.04.001
9.
RipollJ. C.AguadoG.Castilla-EarlsA. P. (2014). The simple view of reading in elementary school: A systematic review. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 34, 17–31. doi:10.1016/j.rlfa.2013.04.006
10.
Russell-MindaE.JutaiJ. W.StrongJ. G.CampbellK. A.GoldD.PrettyL.WilmotL. (2007). The legibility of typefaces for readers with low vision: A research review. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 101, 402–415.
11.
ToroJ.CerveraM. (1995). TALE: test de análisis de lectoescritura. Madrid: Antonio Machado.
12.
VenezkyR. L. (1984). The history of reading research. In PearsonP. D. (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 3–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
WilkinsA.CleaveR.GraysonN.WilsonL. (2009). Typography for children may be inappropriately designed. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 402–412. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01402.x
14.
WoodsR. J.DavisK.ScharffL. F. V. (2005). Effects of typeface and font size on legibility for children. American Journal of Psychological Research, 1, 86–102.
