Enhancing participation and learning in an online forum by providing information on educational influence / La información sobre el ejercicio de la influencia educativa como medio para favorecer la participación y el aprendizaje en un foro en línea
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2015
Enhancing participation and learning in an online forum by providing information on educational influence / La información sobre el ejercicio de la influencia educativa como medio para favorecer la participación y el aprendizaje en un foro en línea
The information provided to participants regarding their activity is a key focus of recent studies aiming to improve the processes and outcomes of computer-supported collaborative learning. The information that is ultimately made available is linked to that considered to be important for online collaborative learning processes. The study presented here attaches special importance both to educational influence and to the distribution of this influence among the participants. Participants were 42 university students. They were given information regarding certain indicators of their participation in the forums, which were theoretically related to the exercise of educational influence at both group and individual levels. The objectives were to analyse the impact of information on the evolution of activity across the forums, and the relationship with the value that participants assigned to the forums and the usefulness of the forums in the learning process. The results indicated that only individual information had a significant impact on participation in subsequent forums. Future studies should incorporate questions related to the meaning that participants ascribe to the information provided to them.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BodemerD.DehlerJ. (2011). Group awareness in CSCL environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1043–1045. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.014
2.
BuderJ. (2011). Group awareness tools for learning: Current and future directions. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1114–1117. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.012
3.
CollC.BustosA.EngelA. (2011). Perfiles de participación y presencia docente distribuida en redes asíncronas de aprendizaje: La articulación del análisis estructural y de contenido. Revista de Educación, 354, 657–688.
4.
CollC.BustosA.EngelA.De GispertI.RocheraM. J. (2013). Distributed educational influence and computer-supported collaborative learning. Digital Education Review, 24, 23–42.
5.
CollC.EngelA.BustosA. (2009). Distributed teaching presence and participants’ activity profiles: A theoretical approach to the structural analysis of asynchronous learning networks. European Journal of Education, 44, 521–538. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01406.x
6.
CollC.OnrubiaJ.MauriT. (2008). Ayudar a aprender en contextos educativos: El ejercicio de la influencia educativa y el análisis de la enseñanza. Revista de Educación, 346, 33–70.
7.
DehlerJ.BodemerD.BuderJ.HesseF. W. (2011). Guiding knowledge communication in CSCL via group knowledge awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1068–1078. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.018
8.
DimitracopoulouA. (2008). Computer based interaction analysis supporting selfregulation: Achievements and prospects of an emerging research direction. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 6, 291–314.
9.
EngelA.CollC.BustosA. (2013). Distributed teaching presence and communicative patterns in asynchronous learning: Name versus reply networks. Computers & Education, 60, 184–196. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.06.011
10.
EngelmannT.TerganS. O. (2007). Knowledge and information awareness for enhancing computer-supported collaborative problem solving by spatially distributed group members. In KayserD.VosniadouS.ProtopapasA. (Eds.), Proceedings of the European cognitive science conference (pp. 71–76). Hove, East Sussex: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
FransenJ.KirschnerP. A.ErkensG. (2011). Mediating team effectiveness in the context of collaborative learning: The importance of team and task awareness. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1103–1113. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.017
12.
GarrisonD. R.AndersonT. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century. A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge Falmer.
13.
GerosaM. A.PimentelM.FuksH.LucenaC. (2004). Analyzing discourse structure to coordinate educational forums. In LesterJ. C.VicariR. M.ParaguacuF. (eds), Proceedings of intelligent tutoring systems. 7th international conference, ITS 2004 (pp. 262–272). Berlin: Springer.
JanssenJ.ErkensG.KirschnerP. A. (2011). Group awareness tools: It’s what you do with it that matters. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1046–1058. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.002
16.
KreijnsK.KirschnerP. A.JochemsW. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335–353. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2
17.
Martı́nezA.DimitriadisY.RubiaB.GómezE.De La FuenteP. (2003). Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers & Education, 41, 353–368. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2003.06.001
18.
MercerN. (2000). Words & Minds. London: Routledge.
19.
MochizukiT.KatoH.HisamatsuS.YaegashiK.FujitaniS.NagataT.SuzukiM. (2005). Promotion of self-assessment for learners in online discussion using the visualization software. In KoschmannT.SuthersD.ChanT. W. (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 years!: Proceedings of the international conference on computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 440–449). Taipei, Taiwan: Lawrence Erlbaum.
RomeroC.VenturaS. (2013). Data mining in education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 3, 12–27. doi:10.1002/widm.1075
22.
SiemensG.BakerR. S. J. D. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. In BuckinghamS.GasevicD.FergusonR. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 252–254). Vancouver, Canada: British Columbia.
23.
VassilevaJ.ChengR.SunL.HanW. (2004). Designing mechanisms to stimulate contributions in collaborative systems for sharing course-related materials. In SollerA.MühlenbrockM.JermannP.Martínez-MoñésA. (Eds.), Proceedings of the workshop on computational models of collaborative learning (pp. 59–64). Maceio, Brazil.
