This paper proposes an alternate model of Vygotsky's zone of proximal development. It is argued that conceptions of the «zone» emphasizing the transfer of skills from adult to child are too narrow, theoretically misleading, and of limited instructional utility. The concept is then examined in relation to Vygotsky's broader theoretical and practical concerns. Examples taken from a recent classroom observational study are provided to illustrate how the concept of the zone can facilitate a critical assessment of children and of the social system created for the children to learn. The focus is on the appropriation and mastery of mediational means, such as writing, assessed not only or necessarily through independent performance after guided practice, but by the ability of children to participate in qualitatively new collaborative activities. The role of the adult isn't to provide structured cues to facilitate performance, but through exploratory talk and other social mediations assist children in taking control of their own learning. The concern is not only with creating individual zones of proximal development, but collective, interrelated zones as part of a teaching system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakhurstD. J. (1986). Thought, speech and the genesis of meaning: On the 50th anniversary of Vygotsky'sMyslenie i Rec’ [Speech and Thinking], Studies in Soviet Thought, 31, 102–129.
2.
BrunerJ. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BerkL. (1986). Relationship of elementary school children's private speech to behavioral accompaniment to task, attention, and task performance.Developmental Psychology, 22(5), 671–680.
4.
BraunC.RennieB.GordonC. (1987). Journal of Educational Research, 80(5), 283–289.
ColeM.GriffinP. (1983). A socio-historical approach to re-mediation.Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 5(4), 69–74.
7.
DíazS.MollL. C.MehanH. (1986). Sociocultural resources in instruction: a context-specific approach. In California State Department of Education, Beyond Language: Social and cultural factors in schooling language minority children (pp. 187–230). Los Angeles: Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center, California State University.
8.
EdelskyC. (1986). Writing in a bilingual program: Había una vez.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9.
EdelskyC.DraperK.SmithK. (1983). Hookin'Em in at the start of school in a Whole Language classroom.Antropology and Education Quarterly, 4, 257–281.
10.
FormanE.CazdenC. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: the cognitive value of peer interactions. InWertschJ. Y. (ed.) (1985). Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 323–347). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
GallimoreR.DaltonS.TharpR. (1986). Self-regulation and interactive teaching: The effects of teaching conditions on teachers' cognitive activity.The Elementary School Journal, 86(3), 613–631.
12.
GoodladJ. (1984). A place called school.New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
GoodmanK. (1986). What's whole in Whole Language?Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
14.
GoodmanK. S.SmithE. B.MeredithR.GoodmanY. M. (1987). Language and Thinking in school: A whole-language curriculum.New York: Richard Owen.
15.
GriffinP.ColeM. (1984). Current activity for the future: The Zo-ped. InRogoffB.WertschJ. (eds.), Children's learning in the «Zone of proximal development» (pp. 45–64). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16.
HeathS. B. (1986). Sociocultural contexts of language development. EnCalifornia State Department of Education, Beyond Language: Social and cultural factors in schooling language minority children (pp. 143–186). Los Angeles: Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center, California State University.
17.
MarkovaA. K. (1979). The teaching and mastery of language.White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
18.
MinickN. (1985). L. S. Vygotsky and Soviet actitity theory: New perspectives on the relationship between mind and society. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University.
19.
MinickN.(In press). Implications of Vygotsky's theories for dynamic assessment. InLidzC. S. (ed.), Foundations of dynamic assessment.New York: Gilford Press.
20.
MollL. C. (1989). Teaching second-language students: A Vygotskian perspective. InJohnsonD.RoenD. (eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 55–69). New York: Longman.
21.
MollL. C. (1988). Key issues in teaching Latino students.Language Arts, 65(5), 465–472.
22.
MollL. C.DíazR. (1987). Teaching writing as communication: The use of ethnographic findings in classroom practice (pp. 195–221). In BloomeD. (ed.), Literacy and schooling (pp. 55–65). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
23.
MollL. C.DíazS. (1987). Change as the goal of educational research.Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18(4), 300–311.
24.
OlsonD. (1986). Intelligence and literacy: The relationship between intelligence and the technologies of representation and communication. InSternbergR.WagnerR. (eds.), Practical intelligence: nature and origins of competence in the everyday world (pp. 338–360). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
RivièreA. (1984). La psicología de Vygotsky [The psychology of Vygotsky].Infancia y Aprendizaje, 27–25(3–4), 7–86.
26.
RoehlerL.DuffyG. (1986). What makes on teacher a better explainer than another.Journal of Education for Teaching, 12(3), 273–284.
27.
RogoffB.WertschJ. (eds.) (1984). Children's learning in the «Zone of proximal development» (pp. 7–18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
TalyzinaN. (1981). The psychology of learning.Moscow: Progress Publishers.
29.
ValsinerJ. (1988). Developmental psychology in the Soviet Union.Sussex, Great Britain: The Harvester Press.
30.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
VygotskyL. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. InWertschJ. V. (ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
32.
VygotskyL. S. (1987). Speech and Thinking. In L. S. Vygotsky, Collected Works, Vol.1 (pp. 39–285). RieberR.CartonA. (eds.), Minick, N., Tr. New York: Plenum.
33.
WertschJ. V. (1984). The zone of proximal development: some conceptual issues. InRogoffB.WertschJ. (eds.), Children's learning in the «Zone of proximal development» (pp. 7–18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34.
WertschJ. V. (1985a). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
WertschJ. V. (Ed.) (1985b). Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives.New York: Cambridge University Press.
