El propósito de este estudio es evaluar la eficacia de la instrucción sistemática en las destrezas de estudio de textos de ciencias sociales. El grupo que siguió un entrenamiento sistemático rindió a un nivel significativamente más alto que el grupo control (sin instrucción) y que el grupo de comparación (que reproducía el método de las clases tradicionales), entre los que no hubo diferencias. También se encontraron diferencias significativas entre los grupos en el tiempo dedicado al estudio. La muestra entrenada disminuyó el tiempo de estudio sin disminuir su rendimiento. En el postest retardado, casi todos los estudiantes entrenados utilizaron algún tipo de estrategia, aunque no fuera exactamente el método de estudio en el que habían sido entrenados. En definitiva, se apoya el uso de la instrucción sistemática para enseñar un método de estudio a alumnos que presentan deficiencias en esta destreza.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsA.The use of direct instruction to teach an independent study method to skill deficient fifth grade students. Tesis doctoral inédita, University of Oregon, 1980.
2.
AikenE. G.ThomasG. S.ShennumW. A.«Memory for a lecture: Effects of notes, lecture rate, and informational density».Journal of Educational Psycholog), 1975, 67, 439–444.
3.
AndersonR. C.«Control of studen mediating processes during verbal learning and instruction».Review of Educational Research, 1970, 40, 349–369.
4.
AndersonT. H.Study skills and learning strategies (Tech. Rep. No. 4). Urbana, IL: Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois, septiembre 1978.
5.
AndréM. E.AndersonT. H.«The development and evaluation of a self-questioning study technique».Reading Research Quarterly, 1978–79, 14, 605–623.
6.
AppelJ. L.CooperR. G.MccarrellN.SimsknightJ.YussenS. R.FlavellJ. H.«The development of the distinction between perceiving and memorizing».Child Development, 1972, 43, 1365–1381.
7.
AullsM. W.«Expository paragraph properties that influence literal recall».Journal of Reading Behavior, 1975, 7, 391–400.
8.
BakerL.Do I understand or do I not understand: That is the question (Reading Education Report No. 10). Urbana, IL: Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois, julio 1979.
9.
BaldwinM. J.«Studies in development and learning».Archives of Psychology, 1909, 12, 65–70.
10.
BassH.People in the Americas.Morristown, NJ: Silver Burdett, 1979.
11.
BeckerW. C.«Teaching reading and language to the disadvantaged-What we learned from field research».Harvard Educational Review, 1977, 47, 518–543.
12.
BereiterC.KurlandM.«Were some Follow Through models more effective than others?».Interchange, 1981–82, 12, 1–22.
13.
BerlinerD. C.RosenshineB. V.The acquisition of knowledge in the classroom (Beginning Teacher Evaluation Study Technical Report Series). San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development, 1976.
14.
BransfordJ. D.JohnsonM. D.«Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall».Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972, 11, 717–726.
15.
BrownA. L.BarclayC. R.«The effects of training specific mnemonics on the metamnemonic efficiency of retarded children».Child Development, 1976, 47, 70–80.
16.
BrownA. L.DayJ. D.The development of rules for summarizing texts. Manuscrito inédito, University of Illinois, 1980.
17.
BrownA. L.SmileyS. S.«Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development».Child Development, 1977, 48, 1–8.
18.
BrownA. L.SmileyS. S.«The development of strategies for studying texts».Child Development, 1978, 49, 1076–1088.
19.
BrownA. L.CampioneJ. C.BarclayC. R.Training self-checking routines for estimating test readiness: Generalizations from list learning to prose recall (Tech. Rep. No. 94). Urbana, IL: Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois, julio 1978.
20.
BrownA. L.CampioneJ. C.DayJ. D.«Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts».Educational Researcher, 1981, 2, 14–21.
21.
CarinineD.SilbertS. J.Direct instruction reading.Columbus, Ohio: Charles Merrill, 1979.
22.
ChodosL. B.HouldS. M.RuschR. R.«Effect of student generated pre-questions and post statements on immediate and delayed recall of fourth grade social studies content». EnPearsonP. D.HasenJ. (Eds.), Reading: Theory, research, and practice, 26th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, 1977.
23.
CookT. D.CampbellD. T.Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field studies.Chicago: Rand McNalley, 1979.
24.
CraikF. I.LockhartR. S.«Levels of processing: A framework for memory research».Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972, 11, 671–684.
25.
CreweJ.HultgrenD.«What does research really say about study skills?» EnSchickG. B.MaysM. M. (Eds.), 18th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference.Milwaukee, WI: NRC, 1969.
26.
DannerF. W.«Children's understanding of intersentence organization in recall of short descriptive passages.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, 68, 174–183.
27.
DayJ. D.Training summarization skills: A comparison of teaching methods. Tesis doctoral inédita, University of Illinois, 1980.
28.
DlggsV. M.«The relative effectiveness of the SQ3R method, a mechanized approarch, and a combination method for teaching remedial reading to college freshmen». EnMcninckG. H.MillerW. D. (Eds.), 24th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference.Milwaukee, WI: NRC, 1975.
29.
DoctorowM.WittrockM. C.MarksC.«Generative processes in reading comprehension».Journal of Educational Psychology, 1978, 70, 109–118.
30.
DonaldM.«The SQ3R method in grade seven».Journal of Reading, 1967, 11, 33–35.
31.
DurkinD.«What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction».Reading Research Quarterly, 1978–79, 15, 481–533.
32.
EdwardsP.«Panorama: A study technique».Journal of Reading, 1973, 17, 132–135.
33.
FawH. W.WallerG. W.«Mathemagenic behaviors and efficiency in learning from prose materials: Review, critique, and recommendations».Review of Educational Research, 1976, 46, 691–720.
34.
FisherC. W.BerlinerD. C.FilbyN. N.MarliaveR.CahenL. S.DishawM. M.«Teaching behaviors, academic learning time and student achievement: An overview». EnDenhamC.LiebermanA. (Eds.), Time to Learns.Washington; D. C.: USOE/NIE Printing, 1980.
35.
FlavellJ. H.WellmanH. M.«Metamemory». EnKailR. V.Jr.HagenJ. W. (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977.
36.
FraseL. T.«Boundary conditions for mathemagenic behaviors».Review of Educational Research, 1970, 40, 337–347.
37.
FraseL. T.SchwartzB. J.«Effect of question production on prose recall».Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975, 67, 628–635.
38.
GagnéE. D.«Long-term retention of information following learning from prose».Review of Educational Research, 1978, 48, 629–665.
39.
GallM. D.WardB. A.BerlinerD. C.CahenL. S.CrownK. A.ElashoffJ. D.StantonG. C.WinneP. H.The effects of teacher use of questioning techniques on student achievement and attitude.San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development, agosto1975.
40.
GatesA. I.«Recitation as a factor in memorizing».Archives of Psychology, 1917, 40, 1–104.
41.
GinnTIEGS-ADAMSOur country.Lexington, MA: Ginn and Co., 1979.
HansenC. L.«Story retelling used with average and learning disabled readers as a measure of reading comprehenson».Learning Disability Quarterly, 1978, 1, 62–69.
44.
HansenC. L.«Chicken soup and other forms of comprehension». EnButtonJ. E.LovittT. C.RowlandT. D. (Eds.), Communication research in learning disabilities and mental retardation.Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, 1979.
45.
HarrisA.How to increase reading ability (5th ed.). Nueva york: McKay, 1970.
46.
HarrisM. B.TrujilloA. E.«Improving study habits of junior high school students through self-management versus group discussion».Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1975, 22, 513–517.
47.
HarrisR. T.A primer of multivariate statistics.Nueva York: Academic Press, 1975.
48.
HatcherC. W.«The effects of question-type on reading comprehension».Dissertation Abstracts International, 1977, 37A(8), 4984.
49.
HershbergerW. A.TerryD. F.«Typographical cueing in conventional and programmed texts».Journal of Applied Psychology, 1965, 19, 42–46.
50.
JenkinsJ. R.PanyD.«Research on teaching reading comprehension: Instructional variables». EnGuthrieJ. (Ed.), Reading comprehension and teaching: Research reviews.Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 1981.
51.
KahnM. S.«Not just another expository textbook study method».College Student Journal, 1978, 12, 372–374.
52.
KeppelG.Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
53.
KintschW.Memory and cognition.Nueva York: Wiley, 1977.
54.
LawrenceA. E.«Study skills and study habits: A review of the research and literature at the secondary levels.Research on Reading in the Secondary Schools, 1978, 2, 3–22.
55.
MaierA. S.«Focusing on the cognition of L.D. children».Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980, 13, 143–147.
56.
McconkieG. W.«Learning from text». EnShulmanL. (Ed.), Review of research in education.Itasca, IL: American Educational Research Association, 1978.
57.
MeyerG.BrandtD.BluthG.«Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students».Reading Research Quarterly, 1980, 16, 72–103.
58.
NewlunC. D.Teaching children to summarize in fifth grade history.Nueva York: Bureau of Publications. Teacher's College, Columbia University, 1930.
RosenshineB.FurstN. F.«Research on teacher performance criteria». EnSmithB. O. (Ed.), Research in teacher education: A symposium.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1971.
71.
RothkopfE. Z.«The concept of mathemagenic activities».Review of Educational Research, 1970, 40, 325–336.
72.
SchallertD. L.KleimanG. M.Why the teacher is easier to understand than the textbook (Reading Education Report No. 9). Urbana, IL: Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illionis, junio 1979.
73.
SchallertD. L.KleimanG. M.RubinA.D.Analysis of differences between written and oral language (Tech. Rep. No. 29). Champaign, IL: Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois, 1977.
74.
SchmelzerR. V.«The effect of college student constructed questions on the comprehension of a passage of expository prose».Dissertation Abstracts International, 1975, 36, 162A.
75.
SmithH. K.«The responses of good and poor readers when asked to read for different purposes».Reading Research Quarterly, 1967, 3, 53–83.
76.
SnowR. W.«Representative and quasi-representative designs for research on teaching».Review of Educational Research, 1974, 44, 265–290.
77.
SpacheG. D.BergP. C.The art of efficient reading.Nueva York: Macmillan, 1966.
78.
SpenserF. R.«Several queries regarding relevant research».Research on Reading in the Secondary Schools, 1978, 2, 23–38.
79.
StallingsJ.«Allocated academic learning time revisited, or beyond time on task».Education Research, 1980, 9, 11–16.
80.
StebbinsL.St. PierreR. G.ProperE. C.AndersonR. B.CervaT. R.Education as experimentation: A planed variation model (Vols. IVA-D). Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates, 1977).
81.
StoodtB. D.BalboE.«Integrating study skills instruction with content in a secondary classroom»Reading World, 1979, 18, 247–252.
82.
SwensonI.KulhavyR. W.«Adjunt questions and the comprehension of prose by children».Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974, 66, 212–215.
83.
ThomasE. L.RobinsonH. A.Improving reading in every class.Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1972.
84.
ThomasK.«The directed inquiry activity: An instructional procedure for content reading».Reading Improvement, 1978, 15, 138–140.
85.
VuicichG.CherryholmesC.CherryholmesL.MansonT.Understanding the United States.Highstown, NJ: McGraw Hill, 1979.
86.
WeinerC.The effect of teacher training in questioning and studen question generation on reading achievement. Tesis doctoral inédita, University of Oregon, 1977.
87.
WelchW. J.Student gains in science achievement and self-as-learner attitude produced by study skills instruction. Tesis doctoral inédita, University of Arizona, 1978.
88.
WertschJ. V.«Adult-child interaction and the roots of metacognition».The Quaterly Newsletter of the Institute of Comparative Human Development, 1978, 2, 15–18.
89.
WillmoreD. J.A comparison of four methods of stydying a college textbook. Tesis doctoral inédita, University of Minnesota, 1967.
90.
WlttrockM. C.MarksC. B.DoctorowM.«Reading as a generative process».Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975, 67, 484–489.
91.
WongB. Y. L.«Increasing retention of main ideas through questioning strategies».Learning Disability Quarterly, 1979, 2, 42–47.
