In the three experiments described, a comparison is made of two methods of measuring the threshold of fusion of two clicks: a signal detection method, and a modified method of constants. The former method reveals a significant ear asymmetry effect, which is accentuated when a burst of white noise is presented contralaterally with the clicks. Results are discussed with reference to differentiation of function of the cerebral hemispheres.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakkerD. J. (1968). Left-right differences in auditory perception of verbal and non-verbal material by children. Q. Jl exp. Psychol.20, 334–6.
2.
von BekesyG. (1948). Vibration of a head in a sound field and its role in hearing by tone conduction. J. acoust. Soc. Am.20, 749–60.
3.
BroadbentD. E.GregoryM. (1963). Division of attention and the decision theory of signal detection. Proc. R. Soc. (B)158, 222–32.
4.
BrydenM. P. (1963). Ear preferences in auditory perception. J. exp. Psychol.65, 103–5.
5.
CalearoC.AntonelliA. R. (1963). “Cortical” hearing tests and cerebral dominance. Acta Otolaryngol.56, 17–26.
6.
DirksD. (1965). Perception of dichotic and monaural verbal material and cerebral dominance. Acta Otolaryngol.58, 73–80.
7.
DonchinE.WickeJ. D.LindsleyD. B. (1963). Cortical evoked potentials and perception of paired flashes. Science, N.Y.141, 1285–6.
8.
HornG.VenablesP. H. (1964). The effect of somaesthetic and acoustic stimuli on the threshold of fusion of paired light flashes in human subjects. Q. Jl exp. Psychol.16, 289–96.
9.
KeitzmanM. L. (1967). Two pulse measures of temporal resolution as a function of stimulus energy. J. opt. Soc. Am.57, 809–13.
10.
KimuraD. (1961). Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canad. J. Psychol.15, 166–71.
11.
KimuraD. (1964). Left-right differences in the perception of melodies. Q. Jl exp. Psychol.16, 355–8.
12.
LaneC. E. (1925). Binaural beats. Physiol. Rev.26, 401–12.
13.
MilnerB. (1962). Laterality effects in audition. Inter-hemispheric Relations and Cerebral DominanceMountcastleV.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
14.
PenfieldW. P.RobertsL. R. (1959). Speech and Brain MechanismsLondon: Oxford University Press.
15.
RosenzweigM. R. (1951). Representations of the two ears at the auditory cortex. Am. J. Physiol.167, 147–58.
16.
ShankweilerD. (1966). Effects of temporal lobe damage on perception of dichotically presented melodies. J. comp. physiol. Psychol.62, 115–9.
17.
SwetsJ. A.TannerW. P.BirdsallT. G. (1961). Decision processes in perception. Psychol. Rev.68, 301–40.
18.
TaylorM. M. (1967). Detectability theory and the interpretation of vigilance data. Acta Psychol.27, 390–9.
19.
TreismanA.GeffenG. (1968). Selective attention and cerebral dominance in perceiving and responding to speech messages. Q. Jl exp. Psychol.20, 139–50.
20.
VaughanH. G.CostaL. D. (1964). Application of evoked potential techniques to behavioural investigation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.118, 71–5.
21.
VenablesP. H. (1967). The relation of two flash and two click thresholds to withdrawal in paranoid and non-paranoid schizophrenics. Br. J. Soc. clin. Psychol.6, 60–2.
22.
VenablesP. H.Warwick-EvansL. A. (1968). The effect of stimulus amplitude on the threshold of fusion of paired flashes. Q. Jl exp. Psychol.20, 30–7.
