The fields of biology, medicine, and embryology have described the developmental milestones of humans throughout gestation in great detail. It is less clear as to when humans are recognized as people, persons, or beings with rights that are protected by legislation. The practice of law is irrevocably intertwined with that of ethical conduct; and the time at which a human life is considered a person has implications that extend to health care, legislation on abortion, and autonomy of individuals. This article reviews the economical position that fertilization is the moment that personhood of the conceptus begins. Alternate positions proposing that personhood begins at other possible times after fertilization are presented and contrasted to the economical hypothesis.
Summary
This article is an original work critically analyzing the various arguments for human personhood at fertilization and thereafter. The various positions on human personhood are compared and contrasted herein. The time of the human lifespan at which personhood is conferred has important implications for health care, legislation, and personal autonomy.
AquinasThomas. 1948. Summa Theologica. New York: Benziger Bros.
2.
AshleyBenedict, and O'RourkeKevin. 2006. When does human life begin? In Health care ethics: A theological analysis. 4th ed., 227–40. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
3.
BernatJames1998. A defense of the whole brain concept of death. Hastings Center Report28, no. 2: 14–24.
4.
Boethius n.d. Liber de persona et duabus naturis.
5.
BozzatoGianni2008. Is the pellucid membrane of the early embryo an extraneous “zone” or a constitutive external part of it?Linacre Quarterly75: 245–56.
6.
BrackenW. Jerome2001. Is the early embryo a person?Linacre Quarterly68, no. 1: 49–70.
7.
AssociationCanadian Medical, Committee on Ethics.1991. The Status of the Human Foetus.Ontario, Canada: Prentice-Hall Canada, Inc.
8.
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. 1987. Respect for human embryos. In Respect for human life in its origin and on the dignity of procreation: Replies to certain questions of the day. Washington, DC: United States Catholic Conference.
9.
DennettDaniel1976. Conditions of personhood. In The identities of persons, ed. RortyA.O., 175–98. London, UK: University of California Press, Ltd.
10.
DennettDaniel1978. Conditions of personhood. In Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology, 267–85. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
11.
DonceelJoseph1970. Immediate animation and delayed hominization. Theological Studies31: 76–105.
12.
DuncanFrancesca E., QueEmily L., ZhangNan, FeinbergEve C., O'HalloranThomas V., and WoodruffTeresa K.2016. The zinc spark is an inorganic signature of human egg activation. Scientific Reports6: 24737.
13.
DysonAnthony1991. At heaven's command?: The churches, theology, and experiments on embryos. In Experiments on embryos, ed. DysonA. and HarrisJ., 82–105. New York: Routledge.
14.
EgliDieter, ChenAlice E., SaphierGenevieve, IchidaJustin, FitzgeraldClaire, GoKathryn J., NicoleAcevedo, 2011. Reprogramming within hours following nuclear transfer into mouse but not human zygotes. Nature Communications4, no. 2: 488.
15.
FarahMartha J., and HeverleinAndrea S.2007. Personhood and neuroscience: naturalizing or nihilating?American Journal of Bioethics7, no. 1: 37–48.
16.
FitzgeraldM. J. T., and FitzgeraldMaeve. 1994. Human embryology. Hong Kong: Dah Hua Printing Press Co Ltd.
17.
FletcherJoseph1979. Humanness. In Fletcher, Humanhood: Essays in biomedical ethics, 7–19. Buffalo NY: Prometheus Books.
18.
FordNorman1988. When did I begin?: Conception of the human individual in history, philosophy and science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
GaillardAfsaneh, and JaberMohamed. 2011. Rewiring the brain with cell transplantation in Parkinson's disease. Trends in Neurosciences34, no. 3: 124–33.
20.
GallagherJohn1984. Is the human embryo a person?. Toronto ON: Human Life Research Institute of Ottawa.
21.
GeorgeRobert P., and TollefsenChristopher. 2008. Embryo: A defense of human life. New York: Doubleday.
22.
GerhauserClarissa2016. Cancer chemoprevention and nutri-epigenetics: State of the art and future challenges. Topics in Current Chemistry329: 73–132.
23.
GiladYoav, PaiAthma, Pique-RegiRoger, CainCarolyn, DegnerJacob, LewellenNoah, MicheliniKatelyn, and PritchardJonathan. 2012. Genome-wide comparison of genetic and epigenetic regulatory mechanisms in primates. San FranciscoCA, American Society of Human Genetics, Nov6–10.
24.
GlennLinda M.2002. Biotechnology at the margins of personhood: An evolving legal paradigm. Thesis. Master of Laws, McGill University, Montreal.
25.
HallJ.L., EngelD., GindoffP.R., MottlaG.L., and StillmanR.J.1993. Experimental cloning of human polyploid embryosu an artificial zona pellucida. Abstract from American Fertility Society and the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society Meeting, Montreal, Quebec, October 13. Fertility & Sterility61: S1.
26.
HepperPeter G., and ShahidullahSara. 1994. The beginnings of mind - evidence from the behavior of the fetus. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology12: 143–54.
27.
HornJoseph M., LoehlinJohn C., and WillermanLee. 1976. Nature-nurture and intelligence: The twin and adoption studies agree. Acta Geneticae Medicae Et Gemellologiae25: 195–7.
28.
JamesWilliam H.1970. The incidence of spontaneous abortion. Population Studies24, no. 2: 241–5.
29.
JonesD. Gareth2004. The emergence of person. In From cells to souls - and beyond: Changing portraits of human nature, ed. JeevesM., 22–31. Cambridge: William B. Eerdmans.
30.
KantImmanuel1948. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. In The moral law: Kant's groundwork of the metaphysics of morals, ed. PatonH.J.London UK: Hutchinson.
31.
KhinchinAleksandr I.1960. Reduction to the problem of the theory of probability. In Mathematical foundations of quantum statistics, ed. ShapiroIrwin, 70. Mineola NY: Dover Publications Inc.
32.
LaitinenArto2007. Sorting out aspects of personhood: Capacities, normativity and recognition. Journal of Consciousness Studies14, no. 5-6: 248–70.
33.
LeePatrick, and GeorgeRobert P.2005. The wrong of abortion. In Contemporary debates in applied ethics, ed. CohenA.I. and WellmanC.H., 13–26. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
34.
LittleMargaret O.2008. Abortion and the margins of personhood. Rutgers Law Journal39: 331–48.
35.
LockeJohn1997. An essay concerning human understanding. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
36.
McMahanJeff2002. The ethics of killing: Problems at the margins of life. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
MooreKeith1988. Essentials of human embryology. Toronto ON: BC Decker Inc.
38.
NagelTom1993. What is the mind-body problem?Ciba Foundation Symposium174: 1–7.
39.
PaulPope JohnII. 1995. You shall not kill. In idem, The gospel of life (Evangelium Vitae), 92–140. New York: Times Books: Random House.
40.
RahnerKarl1972. The problem of genetic manipulation. In Theological investigations, vol. 9, 225–52. Bristol, UK: Western Printing Services Ltd.
41.
SadlerThomas W.2012. General embryology. In Langman's Medical Embryology. 12th ed., 3–129. Philadelphia, PA: Lipincott William & Wilkins.
42.
SerleElisabeth, AplinJohn D., LiTin-Chiu, WarrenM. Alistair, GrahamRosalind A., SeifMourad W., and CookeIan D.1994. Endometrial differentiation in the peri-implantation phase of women with recurrent miscarriage: A morphological and immunohistochemical study. Fertility and Sterility62, no. 5: 989–96.
43.
ShannonThomas A., and WolterAllan B.1990. Reflections on the moral status of the pre-embryo. Theological Studies51, no. 4: 618–9.
44.
ShiLingjun, and WuJi. 2009. Epigenetic regulation in mammalian preimplantation embryo development. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology7, no. 59: published online.
45.
SingerPeter. 1994. Rethinking life and death - the collapse of our traditional ethics. New York: St. Martin's Griffin.
SteinJason L., MedlandSarah E., VasquezAlejandro Arias, HibarDerrek P., SenstadRudy E., WinklerAnderson M., ToroRoberto, 2012. Identification of common variants associated with human hippocampal and intracranial volumes. Nature Genetics44, no. 5: 552–61.
48.
UenoSatoshi, BodriDaniel, UchiyamaKazuo, OkimuraTadashi, OkunoTakashi, KobayashiTamotsu, and KatoKeiichi. 2014. Developmental potential of zona pellucida-free oocytes obtained following mild in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility102, no. 6: 1602–607.
49.
VakilNimish B., HallingKatarina, BecherAnja, and RydenAnna. 2013. Systematic review of patient-reported outcome instruments for gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology25, no. 1: 2–14.
50.
WallL. Lewis, and BrownDouglas. 2006. Regarding zygotes as person: Implications for public policy. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine49, no. 4: 602–10.
51.
WarrenMary A.1989. The moral significance of birth. Hypatia4, no. 3: 46–65.
52.
YuChih-Chieh, FurukawaMari, KobayashiKazuhiro, ShikishimaChizuru, ChaPei-Chieng, SeseJun, HirokoSugawara, 2012. Genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression analyses of monozygotic twins discordant for intelligence levels. PLoS One7, no. 10: 270–85.
