The aim of the paper is to propose that special mental health laws be replaced by generic protection and prevention legislation. The arguments used for the detention and compulsory treatment of persons with mental illnesses are analysed, and found not to justify protection and prevention rules which apply only to persons with mental illnesses. Two separate systems of legal intervention should be established to deal with (1) all persons in need of compulsory care and (2) all persons who require to be detained for the prevention of harm to others.
References
1.
CampbellTHeginbothamC.Mental illness: Prejudice, discrimination and the law. Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1991.
2.
CampbellTHeginbothamC. Op.cit.:4.
3.
CampbellT.Sex discrimination: Mistaking the relevance of gender. In: McLeanSBurrowsN, eds. The legal relevance of gender. London: MacMillan, 1988: chap.2.
4.
RotundaRNowakJYoungJ, eds. Treatise on constitutional law: Substance and procedure 2. St Paul: West, 1986.
5.
MooreM.Law and psychiatry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. Radden J. Madness and reason. London: Allen and Unwin, 1985. Scheff T. Being mentally ill. Chicago: Aldine, 1966. Szasz T. The myth of mental illness. New York: Harper and Row, 1973.
6.
KendellRE.The concept of illness and its implications for psychiatry. British Journal of Psychiatry1975; 127:305–315.
7.
Mental Health Act (NSW)1990, section 9.
8.
QuintonA.“Madness”. In: GriffithsPhillips A, ed. Philosophy and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985:17–42 at 17.
9.
Audit Commission Report (UK).Making a reality of community care. London: HMSO, 1986. Decay, squalor and neglect. London: MIND, 1988.
10.
Declaration of the Rights of Disabled Persons. General Assembly Resolution 3447, 9 December 1975.
11.
DijkPvan HoofG.Theory and practice of the European Convention on Human Rights. Deventer: Kluwer, 1984:230–234.
12.
Winterwerp vs Netherlands, applic. no. 6301/73 (1979), 2EHRR 387.
13.
CampbellT.The rights approach to mental illness. In: GriffithsPhillips A, ed. Philosophy and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985:221–54. Campbell T. The rights of the mentally ill. In: Campbell T, ed. Human rights: From rhetoric to reality. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986:1–14.
14.
Disability Discrimination Act 1992.
15.
Nobody wants you: 40 cases of discrimination at work. London: MIND, 1978.
16.
TennantT.The dangerous offender. British Journal of Hospital Medicine1971:269–75.
17.
ButlerRA. Report of the Committee on Mentally Abnormal Offenders 1975. HMSO, Cmnd 6244: 4.10.
18.
MullenPE.Mental disorder and dangerousness. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1984; 18:8–17.
19.
Mental Health Act 1983 (England and Wales), section 3, makes a person liable to long term detention, if.
20.
He is suffering from mental illness, severe mental impairment, psychopathic disorder or mental impairment and his mental disorder is of a nature or degree which makes it appropriate for him to receive medical treatment in hospital; and.
21.
In the case of psychopathic disorder or mental impairment, such treament is likely to alleviate or prevent deterioration in his condition; and.
22.
It is necessary for the health or safety of the patient for the protection of other persons that he should receive such treatment and that it cannot be provided unless he is detained in hospital.
23.
CocozzaJSteadmanH.Prediction in psychiatry: A case of misplaced confidence in experts. Social Problems1978; 25:265–76. Ennis B, Litwack T. Psychiatry and the presumption of expertise: Flipping coins in the courtroom. California Law Review 1974; 62:693. Pfohl S. Predicting dangerousness: A social deconstruction of psychiatric reality. In: Teplin R, ed. Mental health and criminal justice. Beverley Hills: Sage, 1984.
24.
Railway Express Agency vs New York, 336 US 106, 112 (1979).
25.
HoggettB.Mental health law. 2nd ed.London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1984:175.
26.
WoottonB.Diminished Responsibility: A layman's view. Law Quarterly Review1960; 76:224–39.
