Abstract
In 1979 a Guardianship Board assumed responsibility in South Australia for the welfare of those mentally ill or handicapped people unable to look after their own health or safety, or to manage their own affairs. This study examines the attitudes to guardianship and involuntary treatment of 79 patients referred to the Board from a psychiatric hospital, all of whom were under guardianship at the time of the study. Forty-seven of their relatives took part in the project, which included measures of patients' psychiatric symptoms and relatives' punitiveness. Although almost 70% of patients objected to Guardianship in principle, they made more positive than negative statements about it. Nearly 60% rated involuntary treatment, including medication, as helpful. Patients reported a level of psychiatric symptoms less than half of that of a psychiatric outpatient sample. Relatives were strongly in favour of Guardianship, stating frequently that it allowed an improved relationship between themselves and the patient. Patients who believed that they were suffering from a mental illness were comparatively happy about being under Guardianship, and a belief that the patient was mentally ill was significantly associated with reduced ex-trapunitiveness in relatives.