The new materialist turn has refocused attention upon the shortcomings, both philosophical and scientific, of styles of thought that figure matter as an inert substance. According to the new materialists, the concept of matter must be rethought in order to account for its own vital capacities. Whilst largely sympathetic to this critique, this paper short-circuits the contemporary focus on matter through a sustained engagement with the process philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead. For Whitehead, the concept of matter represents a failure to think process on its own terms; that is, without invoking an underlying permanence. Whitehead's philosophy is thus of great significance to contemporary debates because it questions what it means to speak of agency, relation, and vitality in a world composed of processual events rather than things. In doing so, it sharpens our sensitivities towards nonhuman processes of existential change. Exploiting this capacity to shift our attention, the paper explores the implications of Whitehead's philosophy by staging an encounter with a peculiar experimental object. By unpacking the key concepts of ‘occasion’, ‘prehension’, and ‘concrescence’, the object in question is gradually transformed from discrete thing to processual event, with a number of consequences for materialist thought.
AshJ, 2010, “Architectures of affect: Anticipating and manipulating the event in processes of videogame design and testing”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space28653–671
2.
AshmoreP, 2013, “Not a drama: Things affect in Herbert Read's The Innocent Eye”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space31935–950
3.
BennettJ, 2004, “The force of things: Steps toward an ecology of matter”Political Theory32347–372
4.
BennettJ, 2010Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things (Duke University Press, Durham, NC)
5.
BissellD, 2010, “Passenger mobilities: Affective atmospheres and the sociality of public transport”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space28270–289
6.
BissellDHynesMSharpeS, 2012, “Unveiling seductions beyond societies of control: Affect, security, and humour in spaces of aeromobility”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space30694–710
7.
BogostI, 2012Alien Phenomenology, or What It's Like to Be a Thing (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
8.
BraunB, 2008, “Environmental issues: Inventive life”Progress in Human Geography32667–679
9.
BraunBWhatmoreS, 2010Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
10.
ClarkN, 2011Inhuman Nature: Sociable Life on a Dynamic Planet (Sage, London)
11.
ColebrookC, 2010Deleuze and the Meaning of Life (Continuum, London)
12.
ConnollyW E, 2013The Fragility of Things: Self-organising Processes, Neoliberal Fantasies, and Democratic Activism (Duke University Press, Durham, NC)
13.
CooleDFrostS, 2010New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics (Duke University Press, Durham, NC)
14.
DaviesG, 2012, “Caring for the multiple and the multitude: Assembling animal welfare and enabling ethical critique”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space30623–638
15.
DawneyL, 2013, “The interruption: Investigating subjectivation and affect”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space31628–644
16.
DeleuzeG, 1995Negotiations (Columbia University Press, New York)
17.
DeleuzeG, 2006The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque (Continuum, London)
18.
DeleuzeGParnetC, 2006Dialogues II (Continuum, London)
19.
EvansA BMieleM, 2012, “Between food and flesh: How animals are made to matter (and not matter) within food consumption practices”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space30298–314
20.
GoodmanS, 2010Sonic Warfare: Sound, Affect and the Ecology of Fear (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
21.
HalewoodM, 2011A.N. Whitehead and Social Theory: Tracing a Culture of Thought (Anthem Press, London)
22.
HarmanG, 2009Prince of Network: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics (re.press, Sydney)
ShaviroS, 2010, “Consequences of panpsychism”, presented at The Fourth International Conference of the Whitehead Research Project, 2 December, Claremont Graduate University, Claremont, CA, http://www.shaviro.com/Othertexts/Claremont2010.pdf
35.
StengersI, 2010Cosmopolitics I (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
36.
StengersI, 2011aThinking with Whitehead: A Free and Wild Creation of Concepts (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA)
37.
StengersI, 2011bCosmopolitics II (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)
38.
StewartK, 2011, “Atmospheric attunements”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space29445–453
39.
ThriftN, 2011, “Lifeworld Inc—and what to do about it”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space295–26
40.
WhatmoreS, 2006, “Materialist returns: Practising cultural geography for a more-than-human world”Cultural Geographies13600–609
41.
WhiteheadA N, 1926aScience and the Modern World (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
42.
WhiteheadA N, 1926bReligion in the Making (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
43.
WhiteheadA N, 1938Modes of Thought (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
44.
WhiteheadA N, 1959, “The aims of education”Daedalus88192–205
45.
WhiteheadA N, 1967Adventures of Ideas (The Free Press, New York)
46.
WhiteheadA N, 1978Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology (Corrected Edition) (The Free Press, New York)
47.
WhiteheadA N, 2004The Concept of Nature (Prometheus, New York)
48.
WilliamsJ, 2008, “The need for metaphysics: On the categories of explanation in process and reality”Theory, Culture and Society2577–90
49.
YusoffK, 2013, “Geologic life: Prehistory, climate, futures in the Anthropocene”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space31779–795
