Polanyi's concept of the ‘double movement’ is frequently interpreted as the opposition between the problematic and unsustainable dynamics of the market and the benign and normatively desirable reaction against this by ‘society’. This paper questions this dualistic interpretation of the double movement and undertakes a problematization of the Polanyian idea of social and environmental protection. It does this by revisiting the concept of the double movement in light of the recent proliferation of market-based mechanisms for environmental regulation. Through an exploration of the different interpretations of Polanyi's work, the paper presents a dialectical reading of the double movement that conceptualizes the idea of social protection within a broader capitalist framework. This is then illustrated with the case of emissions trading as a particular form of environmental protection. Carbon trading as a mitigation strategy, it is argued, corresponds to the Polanyian idea of ‘social protection’ in that its protective potential to reduce emissions is itself constrained by the socioeconomic framework within which it operates. This in turn points to the need for a critique of climate mitigation efforts that goes beyond a focus on current problems with emissions trading schemes.
AltvaterE, 2006, “The social and natural environment of fossil capitalism”, in Socialist Register 2007: Coming to Terms with Nature Eds PanitchLLeysC (Merlin Press, London) pp 37–59
2.
BernardM, 1997, “Ecology, political economy and the counter-movement: Karl Polanyi and the second great transformation”, in Innovation and Transformation in International Studies Eds GillSMittelmanJ H (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 75–89
3.
BöhmSDabhiS, 2009Upsetting the Offset: The Political Economy of Carbon Markets (Mayfly, London)
4.
BondP, 2011, “Carbon Capital's Trial, the Kyoto Protocol's Demise, and Openings for Climate Justice”Capitalism Nature Socialism223–17
5.
BondP, 2012, “Emissions trading, new enclosures and eco-social contestation”Antipode44684–701
6.
BuckD, 2006, “The ecological question: Can capitalism prevail?”, in Socialist Register 2007: Coming to Terms with Nature Eds PanitchLLeysC (Merlin Press, London) pp 60–71
7.
BurawoyM, 2003, “For a sociological Marxism: The complementary convergence of Antonio Gramsci and Karl Polanyi”Politics and Society31193–261
8.
CallonM, 2009, “Civilizing markets: Carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments”Accounting, Organizations and Society34535–548
CastreeN, 2010, “Crisis, continuity and change: Neoliberalism, the Left and the future of capitalism”Antipode41185–213
12.
CharmanK, 2008, “False starts and false solutions: Current approaches in dealing with climate change”Capitalism Nature Socialism1929–47
13.
DaleG, 2010a, “Social democracy, embeddedness and decommodification: On the conceptual innovations and intellectual affiliations of Karl Polanyi”New Political Economy15369–393
14.
DaleG, 2010bKarl Polanyi: The Limits of the Market (Polity Press, Cambridge)
15.
DaleG, 2012, “Double movements and pendular forces: Polanyian perspectives on the neoliberal age”Current Sociology603–27
16.
EC, European Commision, Brussels
17.
2009, “Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the Community”Official Journal of the European UnionL14063–87, 5 June
IIED, 2011, “Biomass energy: Another driver of land acquisitions?”, International Institute for Environment and Development, http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/17098IIED.pdf?
JungingerMBolkesjøTBradleyDDolzanPFaaijAHeinimöJHektorBLeistadØLingEPerryMPiacenteERosillo-CalleFRyckmansYSchouwenbergP-PSolbergBTrømborgEda Silva WalterAde WitM, 2008, “Developments in international bioenergy trade”Biomass and Bioenergy32717–729
40.
KloppenburgJ R, 2004First the Seed (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI)
41.
KosoyNCorberaE, 2010, “Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism”Ecological Economics691228–1236
42.
LacherH, 1999, “The politics of the market: Re-reading Karl Polanyi”Global Society13313–326
43.
LaneR, 2012, “The promiscuous history of market efficiency: The development of early emissions trading systems”Environmental Politics21583–603
LohmannL, 2010, “Uncertainty markets and carbon markets: Variations on Polanyian themes”New Political Economy15225–254
46.
LohmannL, 2011a, “The endless algebra of climate markets”Capitalism Nature Socialism2293–116
47.
LohmannL, 2011b, “Capital and climate change”Development and Change42649–668
48.
LohmannL, 2011c, “Financialization, commodificaiton and carbon: The contradictions of neoliberal climate policy”, in Socialist Register 2012: The Crisis and the Left Eds PanitchLAlboGChibberV (Merlin Press, London) pp 85–107
49.
LohmannL, 2012, “A rejoinder to Matthew Paterson and Peter Newell”Development and Change431177–1184
50.
LovellHBulkeleyHLivermanD, 2009, “Carbon offsetting: Sustaining consumption?”Environment and Planning A412357–2379
51.
McAfeeK, 1999, “Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space17133–154
52.
McCarthyJ, 2005, “Devolution in the woods: Community forestry as hybrid neoliberalism”Environment and Planning A37995–1014
53.
McCarthyJPrudhamS, 2004, “Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism”Geoforum35275–283
54.
MacDonaldK I, 2005, “Global hunting grounds: Power, scale and ecology in the negotiation of conservation”Cultural Geographies12259–291
55.
MansfieldB, 2004, “Neoliberalism in the oceans: ‘rationalization’, property rights, and the commons question”Geoforum35313–326
56.
MitchellD, 2005, “Landscape”, in Cultural Geography: A Critical Dictionary of Key Concepts Eds SibleyDJacksonPAtkinsonDWashbourneN (I B Tauris, London) pp 49–56
57.
NewellPPatersonM, 2010Climate Capitalism: Global Warming and the Transformation of the Global Economy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
58.
NewellPPatersonM, 2011, “Climate capitalism”, in After Cancún Eds AltvaterEBrunnengräberA (Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden) pp 23–44
59.
O'ConnorJ, 1997Natural Causes: Essays in Ecological Marxism (Guilford, London)
PatersonMNewellP, 2012, “Of heroes, villains and climate capitalism: A response to Larry Lohmann”Development and Change431171–1175
62.
PeckJ, 2008, “Remaking laissez-faire”Progress in Human Geography323–43
63.
PolanyiK, 1947, “Our obsolete market economy; civilization must find a new thought pattern”Commentary3109–117
64.
PolanyiK, 2001The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Beacon Press, Boston, MA)
65.
PrudhamS, 2004Knock on Wood: Nature as Commodity in Douglas-fir Country (Routledge, New York)
66.
PrudhamS, 2007, “The fictions of autonomous invention: Accumulation by dispossession, commodification and life patents in Canada”Antipode39406–429
67.
ReyesO, 2011, “Zombie carbon and sectoral market mechanisms”Capitalism Nature Socialism22117–135
68.
RobertsonM M, 2004, “The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: Wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance”Geoforum35361–373
69.
RobertsonM M, 2006, “The nature that capital can see: Science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services”Environment and Planning D: Society and Space24367–387
70.
RuggieJ G, 1982, “International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order”International Organization36379–415
71.
SandbrookR, 2011, “Polanyi and post-neoliberalism in the Global South: Dilemmas of re-embedding the economy”New Political Economy16415–443
72.
SchwaigerHTuerkAPenaNSijmJArrastoAKettnerC, 2012, “The future European Emission Trading Scheme and its impact on biomass use”Biomass and Bioenergy38102–108
73.
SilverB JArrighiG, 2003, “Polanyi's ‘double movement’: The belle epoques of British and U.S. hegemony compared”Politics and Society31325–355
