Heterotopia and the urban politics of climate change experimentation

Abstract

Seeking to govern the city in relation to climate change is a political project that at once imagines the present in terms of the future and the future in terms of the present. The urban politics of climate change has brought multiple visions of the possibilities (and limits) of urban futures. In this context, we find urban responses taking experimental form – creating sites through which to explore and experience different futures. They provide spaces in which utopian visions can be imagined, enacted and contested. Conceptualizing urban climate change experiments as heterotopic sites seems fruitful in at least two regards. Firstly, it captures their provisional and ambivalent relationship with the broader urban milieu. Secondly, and even more critically, it opens up the dialogues between the future and present which are at the heart of the climate governance project, and highlights the spatial form of these politics. We examine both with reference to two examples of climate experimentation in Berlin and Philadelphia.

Keywords

Heterotopia climate politics Philadelphia Berlin climate change experimentation Foucault governing the future

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

Bartelt

Elesh

et al. (2008) Restructuring the Philadelphia Region: Metropolitan Divisions and Inequality, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Adey

Anderson

(2012) Anticipating emergencies: Technologies of preparedness and the matter of security. Security Dialogue 43: 99–117.

Anderson

(2010) Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography 34: 777–798.

Anderson

(2012) Affect and biopower: Towards a politics of life. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37: 28–43.

Aradau

(2010) Security that matters: Critical infrastructure and objects of protection. Security Dialogue 41: 491–514.

Aradau

Van Munster

(2007) Governing terrorism through risk: Taking precautions, (un)knowing the future. European Journal of International Relations 13: 89–115.

Bauman

(1987) Public Housing, Race, and Renewal: Urban Planning in Philadelphia 1920–1974, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Beck

(1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London: Sage Publications.

Berlin Senate (2010) Klimaschutz: Gute Projekte aus Berlin, Berlin: Senatsverwaltung für Gesundheit, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz.

10.

Berlin Senate (2011) Klimaschutz in Berlin, Berlin: Senatsverwaltung für Gesundheit, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz.

11.

Bradley K and Hedrén J (eds) (2014) Green Utopianism: Perspectives, Politics and Micro-practices. New York, NY: Routledge.

12.

Braun

(2014) A new urban dispositif? Governing life in an age of climate change. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32: 49–64.

13.

Bulkeley

(2013) Cities and Climate Change, London: Routledge.

14.

Bulkeley

Castán Broto

(2013) Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38: 361–375.

15.

Bulkeley

Castán Broto

Edwards

GAS

(2015) An Urban Politics of Climate Change: Experimentation and the Governing of Socio-technical Transitions, London: Routledge.

16.

Campbell

(1999) Capital reconstruction and capital accumulation in Berlin: A reply to Peter Marcuse. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 23: 173–179.

17.

City of Philadelphia (2011) Citywide Vision: Philadelphia2035, Philadelphia, PA: Philadelphia City Planning Commission.

18.

Collier

(2008) Enacting catastrophe: Preparedness, insurance, budgetary rationalization. Economy and Society 37: 224–250.

19.

Collier

Lakoff

(2008) Distributed preparedness: The spatial logic of domestic security in the United States. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26: 7–28.

20.

Cooper

(2006) Pre-empting emergence: The biological turn in the war on terror. Theory, Culture & Society 23: 113–135.

21.

Corsín Jiménez

(2014a) The prototype: More than many and less than one. Journal of Cultural Economy 7: 381–398.

22.

Corsín Jiménez

(2014b) The right to infrastructure: A prototype for open source urbanism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32: 342–362.

23.

Dalby

(2013) Biopolitics and climate security in the anthropocene. Geoforum 49: 184–192.

24.

De Búrca

Keohane

Sabel

(2014) Global experimentalist governance. British Journal of Political Science 44: 477–486.

25.

Delgado

Callén

(2017) Do-it-yourself biology and electronic waste hacking: A politics of demonstration in precarious times. Public Understanding of Science 26: 179–194.

26.

Dillon

Reid

(2001) Global liberal governance: Biopolitics, security and war. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 30: 41–66.

27.

Dow Chemical Company and Energy Coordinating Agency (2011) Retrofit Philly: Phase 1 report, Philadelphia, PA: Energy Coordinating Agency.

28.

Edwards

GAS

Bulkeley

(2017) Urban political ecologies of housing and climate change: The ‘Coolest Block’ contest in Philadelphia. Urban Studies 54: 1126–1141.

29.

Evans J, Karvonen A and Raven R (eds) (2016) The Experimental City. London: Routledge.

30.

Foresight (2008) Powering our Lives: Sustainable Energy Management and the Built Environment – Final Project Report, London: The Government Office for Science.

31.

Foucault

(2009) Security, Territory, Population: lectures at the College de France, 1977–78, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

32.

Foucault M (Trans. J Miskowiec) (1986) Of other spaces. Diacritics 16: 22–27.

33.

Gibson-Graham

Roelvink

(2009) An economic ethics for the anthropocene. Antipode 41: 320–346.

34.

Hetherington

(1997) The Badlands of Modernity: Heterotopia and Social Ordering, London: Routledge.

35.

Hoffmann

(2011) Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting with a Global Response after Kyoto, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

36.

International Energy Agency (IEA) (2009) Cities, Towns & Renewable Energy: Yes in my Front Yard, Paris: International Energy Agency.

37.

Johnson

(2013) The geographies of heterotopia. Geography Compass 7: 790–803.

38.

Karvonen

van Heur

(2014) Urban laboratories: Experiments in reworking cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38: 379–392.

39.

(2007) The will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

40.

Lundborg

Vaughan-Williams

(2011) Resilience, critical infrastructure, and molecular security: The excess of “life” in biopolitics. International Political Sociology 5: 367–383.

41.

Luque-Ayala

Marvin

(2015) Developing a critical understanding of smart urbanism? Urban Studies 52: 2105–2116.

42.

Maassen A-CS (2012) Solar cities in Europe: A material semiotic analysis of innovation in urban photovoltaics, PhD Thesis, Department of Geography, Durham University.

43.

Massumi B (2007) Potential politics and the primacy of preemption. Theory & Event 10. Available at https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2007.0066.

44.

Massumi

(2009) National enterprise emergency: Steps toward an ecology of powers. Theory, Culture & Society 26: 153–185.

45.

Methman

Rothe

(2012) Politics for the day after tomorrow: The logic of apocalypse in global climate politics. Security Dialogue 43: 323–344.

46.

Monstadt

(2007) Urban governance and the transition of energy systems: Institutional change and shifting energy and climate policies in Berlin. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31: 326–343.

47.

Moss

(2009) Divided city, divided infrastructures: Securing energy and water services in postwar Berlin. Journal of Urban History 35: 923–942.

48.

Oels

(2013) Rendering climate change governable by risk: From probability to contingency. Geoforum 45: 17–29.

49.

Pinder

(2010) Necessary dreaming: Uses of utopia in urban planning. In: Hillier

Healey

(eds) The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 343–364.

50.

Rosental

(2013) Toward a sociology of public demonstrations. Sociological Theory 31: 343–365.

51.

Saldanha

(2008) Heterotopia and structuralism. Environment and Planning A 40: 2080–2096.

52.

Schade RS, American Institute of Architects (AIA) and Schade and Bolender Architects (2008) Philadelphia Rowhouse Manual: A Practical Guide for Homeowners. Philadelphia: National Trust for Historic Preservation, Office of Housing and Community Development and Philadelphia City Planning Commission, City of Philadelphia.

53.

Swyngedouw

(2011) Depoliticized environments: The end of nature, climate change and the post-political condition. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 69: 253–274.

54.

Transition Network (2013) What is a Transition Initiative? Available at: http://www.transitionnetwork.org/support/what-transition-initiative Accessed 25 November 2015.

55.

Wainwright

Mann

(2013) Climate Leviathan. Antipode 45: 1–22.

56.

Walters

(2012) Governmentality: Critical Encounters, Abingdon: Routledge.

57.

Williams

Booth

(2013) Time and the spatial post-politics of climate change: Insights from Australia. Political Geography 36: 21–30.

58.

Wynne

(1992) Uncertainty and environmental learning: Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environmental Change 2: 111–127.