Does a high-tech economy create fundamentally different places from other employment areas? In this paper I propose a typology of small to medium-scale high-technology districts in terms of their physical environments rather than their economic features (which is the more common basis of such classifications). I define a set of recognizable high-tech places: corridors, clumps, cores, comprehensive campuses, tech nology subdivisions, and scattered technology sites. I argue that there are many overlaps in design and layout with generic urban industrial and office development, and with planned new towns, university campuses, and garden suburbs. However, as this part of the economy grows, so too will the effect of such places on long-term urban sustainability and livability. It is important that planning and design for such developments consider larger effects on issues such as transportation options, energy use, housing balance, and sense of place.
BaringaERamfeltL, 2004, “Kista: the two sides of the network society”Networks and Communications Studies18225–244
3.
BassS, 1998, “Japanese research parks: national policy and local development”Regional Studies32391–403
4.
BatheltHMalmbergAMaskellP, 2004, “Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation”Progress in Human Geography2831–56
5.
BergerB, 1960Working-class Suburb: A Study of Auto Workers in Suburbia (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
6.
BerkeP R, 2008, “The evolution of green community planning, scholarship, and practice”Journal of the American Planning Association74393–407
7.
BoddyM, 2000, “Technology, innovation, and regional economic development in the state of Victoria”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy18301–319
8.
BresnahanTGambardellaA, 2004, “Introduction”, in Building High-tech Clusters: Silicon Valley and Beyond Eds BresnahanTGambardellaA (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 1–6
9.
CalthorpePFultonW, 2001The Regional City: New Urbanism and the End of Sprawl (Island Press, Washington, DC)
10.
CassellasA, 2011, “Collaborative approaches to innovation and urban regeneration: the science parks of Barcelona Metropolitan Region”, paper presented at Science and the City, Science and Technology Policy Institute, Seoul, Korea, October
11.
CastellsM, 1997The Power of Identity (Blackwell, Malden, MA)
12.
CastellsM, 2000The Rise of the Network Society2nd edition (Blackwell, Oxford)
13.
CastellsMHallP, 1994Technopoles of the World (Routledge, London)
CorbettJCorbettM, 2000Designing Sustainable Communities: Learning from Village Homes (Island Press, Washington, DC)
16.
CortrightJMayerH, 2001, “High-tech specialization: a comparison of high-technology centers”, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
17.
CraneRChatmanD, 2003, “As jobs sprawl, whither the commute?”Access2314–19
18.
CreweKForsythA, 2011, “Compactness and connection in environmental design: insights from ecoburbs and ecocities for design with nature”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design38267–288
19.
CsikszentmihalyiM, 1996, Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention (Harper Collins, New York)
20.
DaceyJ, 1989Fundamentals of Creative Thinking (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA)
21.
DouglassH, 1925The Suburban Trend (The Century Company, New York)
22.
Dunham-JonesEWilliamsonJ, 2009Retrofitting Suburbia (John Wiley, New York)
23.
EdgingtonD, 2008, “The Kyoto research park and innovation in Japanese cities”Urban Geography29411–454
24.
FangCXieY, 2008, “Site planning and guiding principles of hi-tech parks in China: Shenzhen as a case study”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design35100–121
25.
FishmanR, 1987Bourgeois Utopias: The Rise and Fall of Suburbia (Basic Books, New York)
26.
FloridaRMellanderCStolarickK, 2008, “Inside the black box of regional development: human capital, the creative class and tolerance”Journal of Economic Geography8615–650
27.
ForsythA, 2002, “Who built Irvine? Private planning and the federal government”Urban Studies392507–2530
28.
ForsythA, 2005Reforming Suburbia (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
29.
ForsythA, 2012, “Defining suburbs”Journal of Planning Literature27270–281
30.
ForsythACreweK, 2009, “A typology of comprehensive designed communities since the Second World War”Landscape Journal2756–78
31.
ForsythACreweK, 2010, “Suburban technopoles as places: the international campus-garden-suburb style”Urban Design International15165–182
32.
GrahamSGuyS, 2002, “Digital space meets urban place: sociotechnologies of urban restructuring in downtown San Francisco”City6669–382
33.
GumprechtB, 2005, “The campus as a public space in the American college town”Journal of Historical Geography3372–103
KohF C CKohW T HTschangF T, 2005, “An analytical framework for science parks and technology districts with an application to Singapore”Journal of Business Venturing20217–239
36.
LaiH-CShyuJ Z, 2005, “A comparison of innovation capacity at science parks across the Taiwan Strait: the case of Zhanjiang High-Tech Park and Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park”Technovation25805–813
37.
LangR E, 2003Edgeless Cities: Exploring the Elusive Metropolis (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC)
38.
LangR EBlakelyEGoughM Z, 2005, “Keys to the new metropolis: America's big, fast-growing suburban counties”Journal of the American Planning Association71381–391
39.
LangR ESanchezT WOnerA C, 2009, “Beyond edge city: office geography in the new metropolis”Urban Geography30726–755
40.
MaleckiE, 1982, “Federal R and D spending in the United States of America: some impacts on metropolitan economics”Regional Studies1619–35
41.
MangematinVErrabiK, 2012, “The determinants of science-based cluster growth: the case of nanotechnology”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy30128–146
42.
MarkusenA, 1996, “Sticky places in slippery place: a typology of industrial districts”Economic Geography72293–313
43.
MartinRSunleyP, 2003, “Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea?”Economic Geography35–35
44.
MooreGDavisK, 2004, “Learning the Silicon Valley Way”, in Building High-tech Clusters: Silicon Valley and Beyond Eds BresnahanTGambardellaA (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pp 7–39
O'MaraM P, 2005Cities of Knowledge (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ)
49.
ParkS C, 2001, “Globalisation and local innovation system: the implementation of government policies to the formation of science parks in Japan”AI and Society15263–279
50.
PhelpsN AWoodA M, 2011, “The new post-suburban politics?”Urban Studies482591–2610
51.
PinchSHenryNJenkinsMTallmanS, 2003, “From ‘industrial districts’ to ‘knowledge clusters: a model of knowledge dissemination and competitive advantage in industrial agglomerations”Journal of Economic Geography3373–388
52.
PorterM E, 1998, “Clusters and the new economics of competition”Harvard Business Review76(6) 77–90
53.
RankinW T, 2010, “The epistemology of the suburbs: knowledge, production, and corporate laboratory design”Critical Inquiry36771–806
54.
RogersE, 1995Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, New York)
55.
SchnoreL, 1957, “Satellites and suburbs”Social Forces36121–127
56.
ScottA, 1993Technopolis: High-technology Industry and Regional Development in Southern California (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA)
57.
StorperMScottA, 2009“Rethinking human capital, creativity, and urban growth”Journal of Economic Geography9147–167
58.
UtterbackJ M, 1994Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA)
59.
Vall-CasasPKoschinskyKMendozaC, 2011, “Retrofitting suburbia through pre-urban patterns: introducing a European perspective”Urban Design International16171–187
60.
VallerDPhelpsN, 2011, “Big science and small villages: understanding the context and constraints on high-tech growth in South East England”, paper presented at Science and the City, Science and Technology Policy Institute, Seoul, Korea, October
61.
VallerDPhelpsNWoodA, 2012, “Planning for growth: the implications of localism for ‘Science Vale’, Oxfordshire, UK”Town Planning Review83457–487
62.
van GeenhuizenMNijkampP, 2007, “Cities and footlooseness: in search of place-bound companies and effective location policies”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy25692–708
63.
WakemanR, 2003, “Dreaming the new Atlantis: science and the planning of technopolis, 1955–1985”Osiris18255–290
64.
WardS, 2002Planning the Twentieth-century City (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
