Support for small businesses is often delivered separately for urban and rural areas, based on the idea that the barriers to business growth differ geographically. Yet firms in rural and urban areas will also differ in their characteristics, and these may be more important influences on firm growth than location. In this paper we test whether firms in urban, semirurals, and rural areas perceive each of eight obstacles to their success differently, based on a large sample of UK SMEs. After controlling for selection effects, rural and semirural firms are more likely to perceive regulation as a problem while rural firms are more likely to see the economy as an obstacle to success. We also find some evidence that skills shortages may be more acute for rural firms, once selection effects are controlled for. The results provide only limited support for geographically differentiated policy for small businesses.
Advantage West Midlands, 2005West Midlands Rural Development Framework Birmingham
2.
AndersonDTylerPMcCallionT, 2005, “Developing the rural dimension of business-support policy”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy23519–536
3.
AudretschD B, 1998, “Agglomeration and the location of economic activity”Oxford Review of Economic Policy1418–29
4.
BaumMSchwensCKabstR, 2013, “International as opposed to domestic new venturing: the moderating role of percieved barriers to internationalisation”International Small Business Journal31536–562
5.
BennettR, 2008, “SME policy support in Britain since the 1990s: what have we learnt?”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26375–397
6.
BennettRSmithC, 2002, “Competitive conditions, competitive advantage and the location of SMEs”Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development973–86
7.
BennettR JRobsonP J ABrattonW J A, 2001a, “The influence of location on the use by SMEs of external advice and collaboration”Urban Studies381531–1557
8.
BennettRRobsonP J ABrattonW, 2001b, “Government advice networks for SMEs: an assessment of the influence of local context on Business Link use, impact and satisfaction”Applied Economics33871–885
9.
BlackburnRRamM, 2006, “Fix or fixation? The contribution and limitations of entrepreneurship and small firms to combating social exclusion”Entrepreneurship and Regional Development1873–89
10.
BosworthG, 2010, “Commercial counterurbanisation: an emerging force in rural economic development”Environment and Planning A42966–981
11.
BuehlerSKaiserCJaegerF, 2012, “The geographical determinants of bankruptcy: evidence from Switzerland”Small Business Economics39231–251
12.
CaffynADahlstromM, 2005, “Urban—rural interdependencies: joining up policy in practice”Regional Studies39283–296
13.
CicconeAHallR E, 1996, “Productivity and the density of economic activity”The American Economic Review8654–70
14.
ClarkG LPalaskasTTraceyPTsampraM, 2004, “Globalisation and competitive strategy in Europe's vulnerable regions: firm, industry and country effects in labour-intensive industries”Regional Studies381085–1100
15.
ClarkKDrinkwaterS, 2010, “Recent trends in minority ethnic entrepreneurship in Britain”International Small Business Journal28136–146
16.
CoadATamvadaJ, 2012, “Firm growth and barriers to growth among small firms in India”Small Business Economics39383–400
CowlingMTaylorM, 2001, “Entrepreneurial women and men: two different species?”Small Business Economics16167–175
19.
Defra, 2012, “New rural growth drive to create 3,000 new jobs and 700 businesses”, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, press release, 22 March, London
20.
de HoyosMGreenA, 2011, “Recruitment and retention issues in rural labour markets”Journal of Rural Studies27171–180
21.
DoernRGossD, 2013, “From barriers to barring: why emotion matters for entrepreneurial development”International Small Business Journal31496–519
22.
FitjarR DRodríguez-PoseA, 2011a, “When local interaction does not suffice: sources of firm innovation in urban Norway”Environment and Planning A431248–1267
23.
FitjarR DRodríguez-PoseA, 2011b, “Innovating in the periphery: firms, values and innovation in Southwest Norway”European Planning Studies19555–574
24.
GordonIMcCannP, 2005, “Innovation, agglomeration and regional development”Journal of Economic Geography5523–543
25.
GreenAOwenD, 2003, “Skills shortages: local perspectives from England”Regional Studies37123–134
26.
HubbardCGortonM, 2011, “Placing agriculture within rural development: evidence from EU case studies”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy2980–95
27.
HugginsRWilliamsN, 2009, “Enterprise and public policy: a review of Labour government intervention in the United Kingdom”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy2719–41
28.
JonesTRamM, 2012, “Revisiting … Ethnic-minority businesses in the United Kingdom: a review of research and policy developments”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy30944–950
29.
KalantaridisCBikaZ, 2006, “Local embeddedness and rural entrepreneurship: case-study evidence from Cumbria, England”Environment and Planning A381561–1579
30.
KeebleDTylerP, 1995, “Enterprising behaviour and the urban—rural shift”Urban Studies32975–997
31.
KlaggeBMartinR, 2005, “Decentralized versus centralized financial systems: is there a case for local capital markets?”Journal of Economic Geography5387–421
32.
LeeN, 2011, “Free to grow? Assessing the obstacles faced by actual and potential high growth firms”, National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts, London
33.
LeeNCowlingM, 2013, “Place, sorting effects and barriers to enterprise in deprived areas: different problems or different firms?”International Small Business Journal31914–937
34.
LoughramTSchultz, 2005, “Liquidity: urban versus rural firms”Journal of Financial Economics78341–374
35.
MaddalaG, 1992Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (Cambridge University Press, NewYork)
36.
MallarC, 1977, “The estimation of simultaneous probability models”Econometrica471717–1722
37.
MarshallA, 1890Principles of Economics (Macmillan, London)
38.
MoleK FHartMRoperSSaalD S, 2011, “Broader or deeper? Exploring the most effective intervention profile for public small business support”Environment and Planning A4387–105
39.
NorthDSmallboneD, 2000, “The innovativeness and growth of rural SMEs during the 1990s”Regional Studies34145–157
40.
OvermanHGibbonsS, 2011, “The future of rural policy: lessons from spatial economics”, Policy Paper 8, Spatial Economics Research Centre, London School of Economics, London
41.
PattersonHAndersonD, 2003, “What is really different about rural and urban firms? Some evidence from Northern Ireland”Journal of Rural Studies19477–490
42.
PhelpsN AFallonR JWilliamsC L, 2001, “Small firms, borrowed size and the urban rural shift”Regional Studies35613–624
43.
PhillipsonJGortonMRaleyMMoxeyA, 2004, “Treating farms as firms? The evolutions of farm business support from productionist to entrepreneurial models”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy2231–54
44.
RamMJonesT, 2008, “Ethnic-minority businesses in the UK: a review of research and policy developments”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26352–374
45.
RigbyD LEssletzbichlerJ, 2002, “Agglomeration economies and productivity differences in US cities”Journal of Economic Geography2407–432
46.
RobsonP J ABennettR J, 2000, “SME growth: the relationship with business advice and external collaboration”Small Business Economics15193–208
47.
ScottJ MIrwinD, 2009, “Discouraged advisees? The influence of gender, ethnicity, and education in the use of advice and finance by UK SMEs”Environment and Planing C: Government and Policy27230–245
48.
SmallboneDNorthDKalantaridisC, 1999, “Adapting to peripherality: a study of small manufacturing firms in Northern England”Entrepreneurship and Regional Development11109–127
49.
SmallboneDBaldockRNorthD J, 2003, “Policy support for small firms in rural areas: the English experience”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21825–841
50.
VaessenPKeebleD, 1995, “Growth-oriented SMEs in unfavourable regional environments”Regional Studies29489–505
51.
Van CauwenbergePVander BauwhedeHSchoonjansB, 2013, “An evaluation of public spending: the effectiveness of a government-supported networking program in Flanders”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy3124–38
52.
WestheadP, 1995, “New owner-managed businesses in rural and urban areas in Great Britain: a matched pairs comparison”Regional Studies29367–380
53.
WestheadPCowlingM, 1998, “Family firm research: the need for a methodological rethink”Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice2331–56
