With this paper we identify a number of the theoretical principles that apply to public—private partnership (PPP) contracts, introducing new case studies and policy discussions relevant for Europe and elsewhere. We discuss to what extent these contracts can and should be applied in the waste sector and perform a comparison between the purely contractual and the institutionalised models of PPP arrangements. We analyse four case studies in the ‘wholesale’ waste market in Portugal and examine the implementation and degree of success of these partnerships in the field. It seems that public authorities are failing to secure an adequate level of protection of the public interest. Drawing on the empirical evidence, we present some guidelines that could lead to better regulatory contracts for waste services.
AcereteBShaoulJStaffordA, 2009, “Taking its toll: The private financing of roads in Spain”Public Money and Management2919–26
2.
AsenovaDBeckM, 2010, “Crucial silences: When accountability met PFI and finance capital”Critical Perspectives on Accounting211–13
3.
AyresIBraithwaiteJ, 1995Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (Oxford University Press, New York)
4.
BajariPHoughtonSTadelisS, 2006, “Bidding for incomplete contracts: An empirical analysis”, WP 12051, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
5.
BajariPMcMillanRTadelisS, 2009, “Auctions versus negotiations in procurement: An empirical analysis”Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization25372–399
6.
BakerMHincksSSherriffG, 2010, “Getting involved in plan making: Participation and stakeholder involvement in local and regional spatial strategies in England”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy28574–594
7.
BelGFagedaX, 2010, “Partial privatization in local services delivery: An empirical analysis on the choice of mixed firms”Local Government Studies36129–149
8.
BelGMirallesA, 2010, “Choosing between service fees and budget funding to pay for local services: Empirical evidence from Spain”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy2854–71
9.
BoardmanAEckelCViningA, 1986, “The advantages and disadvantages of mixed enterprises”, in Multinational Corporations and State-owned Enterprises: A New Challenge in International Business Eds NegandhiAThomasHRaoK (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) pp 221–224
10.
BroadbentJBallAJarvisT, 2006, “Waste management, the challenges of the PFI and ‘sustainability reporting’”Business Strategy and the Environment15258–274
11.
BruxJ, 2010, “The dark and bright sides of renegotiation: An application to transport concession contracts”Utilities Policy1877–85
12.
BulkeleyHWatsonMHudsonR, 2007, “Modes of governing municipal waste”Environment and Planning A392733–2753
13.
ChongE, 2006Competitive Solutions for Managing Local Public Services: An Economic Analysis of Water Supply in France PhD dissertation, Jean Monnet Faculty, Université De Paris XI — Paris Sud
14.
CrockerKMastenS, 1996, “Regulation and administered contracts revisited: Lessons from transaction-cost economics for public utility regulation”Journal of Regulatory Economics95–39
15.
CruzNMarquesR, 2011, “Viability of municipal companies in the provision of urban infrastructure services”Local Government Studies3793–110
16.
CruzNMarquesR, 2012, “Mixed companies and local governance: No man can serve two masters”Public Administration90737–758
17.
DemsetzH, 1968, “Why regulate utilities?”Journal of Law and Economics1155–65
18.
DevasNDelayS, 2006, “Local democracy and the challenges of decentralising the state: An international perspective”Local Government Studies32677–695
19.
DijkgraafEGradusR H J M, 2008, “Institutional developments in the Dutch waste-collection market”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26110–126
20.
EC, European Commission, Brussels
21.
EC, European Commission2004aGreen Paper on Public—Private Partnerships and Community Law on Public Contracts and Concessions
22.
EC, European Commission2004bResource Book on PPP Case StudiesDirectorate-General Regional Policy
23.
EC, European Commission2008Commission Interpretative Communication on the Application of Community Law on Public Procurement and Concessions to Institutionalised PPP
24.
EckelCViningA, 1985, “Elements of a theory of mixed enterprise”Scottish Journal of Political Economy3282–94
25.
EdelenbosJTeismanG R, 2008, “Public—private partnership: On the edge of project and process management. Insights from Dutch practice: The Sijtwende spatial development project”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26614–626
26.
EPEC, 2010Eurostat Treatment of Public—Private Partnerships: Purposes, Methodology and Recent TrendsEuropean PPP Expertise Centre, Luxembourg
27.
ERSAR, 2010Annual Report on Water and Waste Services in Portugal (2009)The Water and Waste Services Regulation Authority, Lisbon
28.
FobilJArmahNHogarhJCarbooD, 2008, “The influence of institutions and organizations on urban waste collection systems: An analysis of waste collection system in Accra, Ghana (1985–2000)”Journal of Environmental Management86262–271
29.
GoldbergV, 1976, “Regulation and administered contracts”Bell Journal of Economics7426–448
30.
GrimseyDLewisM, 2005, “Are public—private partnerships value for money? Evaluating alternative approaches and comparing academic and practitioner views”Accounting Forum29345–378
31.
GuaschJ, 2004Granting and Renegotiating Infrastructure Concession: Doing It Right (World Bank, Washington, DC)
32.
IST, 2007Análise dos Tarifários de Serviços de Gestão de Resíduos Urbanos em PortugalThe Water and Waste Services Regulation Authority, Lisbon
33.
KeYWangSChanA, 2010, “Risk allocation in public—private partnership infrastructure projects: A comparative study”Journal of Infrastructure Systems16343–351
34.
KoppenjanJ, 2005, “The formation of public—private partnerships: Lessons from nine transport infrastructure projects in The Netherlands”Public Administration83135–158
35.
LobinaEHallD, 2007, “Experience with private sector participation in Grenoble, France, and lessons on strengthening public water operations”Utilities Policy1593–109
36.
MacneilI, 1974, “The many futures of contracts”Southern California Law Review47691–816
37.
McQuaidRScherrerW, 2010, “Changing reasons for public—private partnerships (PPPs)”Public Money and Management3027–34
38.
MarinP, 2009Public—Private Partnerships for Urban Water Utilities: A Review of Experiences in Developing Countries (World Bank, Washington DC)
39.
MarquesRBergS, 2010, “Revisiting the strengths and limitations of regulatory contracts in infrastructure industries”Journal of Infrastructure Systems16334–342
40.
MarquesRBergS, 2011, “Risks, contracts and private sector participation in infrastructure”Journal of Construction Engineering and Management137925–932
41.
MarquesRSimõesP, 2008, “Does the sunshine regulatory approach work? Governance and regulation model of the urban waste services in Portugal”Resources Conservation and Recycling521040–1049
42.
MarraA, 2007, “Internal regulation by mixed enterprises: The case of the Italian water sector”Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics78245–275
43.
MassaruttoA, 2006, “Waste management as a service of general economic interest: Is the self-sufficiency principle still justified?”, WP 05–05-eco, Universitá di Udine, Udine
44.
MassoudMEl-FadelMMalakM, 2003, “Assessment of public vs private MSW management: A case study”Journal of Environmental Management6915–24
45.
MoszoroM, 2010, “Efficient public—private partnerships”, WP 884, IESE Business School, Universidad de Navarra, Barcelona
46.
OECD, 2010Accountability and Transparency: A Guide for State Ownership (OECD, Paris)
47.
PosnerR, 2010, “From the new institutional economics to organization economics: With applications to corporate governance, government agencies, and legal institutions”Journal of Institutional Economics61–37
48.
ReevesE, 2008, “The practice of contracting in public private partnerships: Transaction costs and relational contracting in the Irish schools sector”Public Administration86969–986
49.
ReganMSmithJLoveP, 2011, “Infrastructure procurement: Learning from private—public partnership experiences ‘down under’”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy29363–378
50.
SavasE, 2000Privatization and Public—Private Partnerships (Seven Bridges Press, New York)
51.
SchmitzP, 2000, “Partial privatisation and incomplete contracts: The proper scope of government reconsidered”Finanzarchiv56394–411
52.
SørensenR, 2008, “Does public ownership impair efficiency in Norwegian refuse collection?”, in The Waste Market: Institutional Developments in Europe Eds DijkgraafEGradusR (Springer, Berlin) pp 67–81
53.
SpillerP, 2008“An institutional theory of public contracts: Regulatory implications”, WP 14152, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
54.
StiglitzJWallstenS, 1999, “Public—private technology partnerships: Promises and pitfalls”American Behavioral Scientist4352–73
55.
WallsM, 2005, “How local governments structure contracts with private firms: Economic theory and evidence on solid waste and recycling contracts”Public Works Management and Policy9206–222
56.
WarnerM, 2008, “Reversing privatization, rebalancing government reform: Markets, deliberation and planning”Policy and Society27163–174
57.
WatsonMBulkeleyHHudsonR, 2008, “Unpicking environmental policy integration with tales from waste management”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26481–498
58.
WeberBAlfenH W, 2010Infrastructure as an Asset Class: Investment Strategies, Project Finance and PPP (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
59.
WilliamsonO, 1979, “Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relationships”Journal of Law and Economics22233–261
60.
WilliamsonO, 1985The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets and Relational Contracting (The Free Press, New York)
61.
YescombeE, 2007Public—Private Partnerships: Principles of Policy and Finance (Elsevier, Oxford)
62.
ZhangDTanSGersbergR, 2010, “Municipal solid waste management in China: Status, problems and challenges”Journal of Environmental Management911623–1633
