Drawing on the analytical concept of ‘sensemaking’ as defined by Weick [1995, Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)], and on scholarship concerning discourses on architect identity and the regulatory context of architecture, in this paper I examine how architects make sense of the issue of climate adaptation. I found that discourses on architects' identity and context appeared to shape the way climate adaptation was made sense of, rather than the other way around. Also, architect identity and contextual factors were more important in architects' sensemaking than features of the climate adaptation issue itself. Most important among the identity-related element of architects' sensemaking was the conception of architects' expertise as holistic—encompassing both aesthetic–creative and technical–craft-related dimensions. Among contextual factors in architects' sensemaking, national building regulations and the industry's focus on cost efficiency were the most central.
AallCEkströmFHeibergEStormH, 2009, “Lokal sårbarhet for klimaendringer. Demonstrasjon av metoder for kartlegging av den institusjonelle sårbarheten for klimaendringer” [Local vulnerability to climate changes. Demonstration of methods for the assessment of the institutional vulnerability to climate change], Vestlandsforskingsrapport 6/2009, Vestlandsforskning [Western Norway Research Institute], Sogndal
2.
BerkhoutFHertinJGannD M, 2006, “Learning to adapt: Organisational adaptation to climate change impacts”Climatic Change78135–156
3.
CohenLWilkinsonAArnoldJFinnR, 2005, “‘Remember I'm the bloody architect!’”Work, Employment and Society19775–796
4.
CorbinJ MStraussA L, 2008Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)
5.
DentMWhiteheadS, 2002Managing Professional Identities: Knowledge, Performativity and the ‘New’ Professional (Routledge, London)
6.
FischerJGuyS, 2009, “Re-interpreting regulations: Architects as intermediaries for low-carbon buildings”Urban Studies462577–2594
7.
GrovenK, 2005, “Klimasårbarhet i bustadsektoren—Lokal sårbarheitskartlegging og klimatilpassing” [Climate adaptation in the housing sector—local vulnerability assessment and climate adaptation], VF-rapport 1/2005, Vestlandsforskning [Western Norway Research Institute], Sogndal
8.
HabrakenN J, 2005Palladio's Children (Taylor and Francis, London)
9.
ImrieRStreetE, 2011Architectural Design and Regulation (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
10.
IngvaldsenT, 2008, “Byggskadeomfanget i Norge (2006): En vurdering basert på et tidligere arbeid og nye data” [Building defects in Norway (2006): An assessment based on an earlier work and new data], Prosjektrapport 17–2008, SINTEF Byggforsk, Oslo
11.
JasanoffS, 2010, “A new climate for society”Theory Culture Society27233–253
12.
JonesCLivne-TarandachR, 2008, “Designing a frame: Rhetorical strategies of architects”Journal of Organizational Behavior291075–1099
13.
LisøK R, 2006, “Integrated approach to risk management of future climate change impacts”Building Research and Information341–10
14.
LisøK RAandahlGEriksenSAlfsenK H, 2003, “Preparing for climate change impacts in Norway's built environment”Building Research and Information31200–209
15.
MarchJ G, 1984, “How we talk and how we act: Administrative theory and administrative life”, in Leadership and Organizational Culture: New Perspectives on Administrative Theory and Practice Eds SergiovanniT JCorballyJ E, (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL) pp 18–35
16.
MooreS AWilsonB B, 2009, “Contested construction of green building codes in North America: The case of the Alley Flat Initiative”Urban Studies462617–2641
17.
O'BrienKSygnaLHaugenJ, 2004, “Vulnerable or resilient? A multi-scale assessment of climate impacts and vulnerability in Norway”Climatic Change64193–225
18.
OreskesN, 2004, “Science and public policy: What's proof got to do with it?”Environmental Science and Policy7369–383
19.
OwenCDoveyK, 2008, “Fields of sustainable architecture”Journal of Architecture139–21
20.
ØyenC FEriksenSLisøK RKvandeT, 2005, “Adaptation to climate change in the construction industry. Local adaptation in the Pre-Fab housing industry”, in Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Building Physics in the Nordic Countries, http://web/byv.kth.se/bphys/reykjavik/view_article.asp?param=ID&data=129
21.
PowerM, 1997The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
22.
PowerM, 2004The Risk Management of Everything. Rethinking the Politics of Uncertainty (Demos, London)
23.
RegClim, 2005“Klimaet i Norge om 50 år” [The climate in Norway in 50 years], Regional Climate Development Under Global Warming, http://www.nilu.no/regclim
24.
RIBA, 2005Constructive Change: A Strategic Industry Study into the Future of the Architects' Profession: Full ReportRoyal Institute of British Architects, London
25.
RIBA, 2011The Future for Architects. Building FuturesRoyal Institute of British Architects, London
26.
RyghaugM, 2003Towards a Sustainable Aesthetics: Architects Constructing Energy Efficient Buildings PhD thesis, Department of Sociology and Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
27.
SmitBBurtonIKleinR J TWandelJ, 2000, “An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability”Climatic Change45223–251
