This paper presents an intraurban cellular automata model that is an extension to White and Engelen's pioneering model. The paper's main contribution is to distinguish between agglomerative effects, determined by the attraction of the neighbourhood, and disagglomerative effects, driven by land prices, or land affordability. In order to do that, social heterogeneity is introduced in the model at the intraurban level. As a result, we can simulate both the evolution of land use and land prices. An application of the model and a sensitivity analysis indicate that neighborhood influence is the main driving force of cities' spatial configurations. Prices, however, exert an important countereffect. Actually, the higher the influence of land prices, the faster land succession is observed. Finally, an important conclusion of the model is that intraurban models should not fail to differentiate actors by income level.
AllenP M, 1997Cities and Regions as Self-organizing Systems: Models of Complexity (Taylor and Francis, Amsterdam)
2.
AndersonS TWestS E, 2006, “Open space, residential property values, and spatial context”Regional Science and Urban Economics36773–789
3.
AraiTAkiyamaT, 2004, “Empirical analysis for estimating land use transition potential functions-case in the Tokyo metropolitan region”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems2865–84
4.
BarredoJ IDemicheliL, 2003, “Urban sustainability in developing countries' megacities: Modelling and predicting future urban growth in Lagos”Cities20297–310
5.
BarredoJ IKasankoMMcCormickNLavalleC, 2003, “Modelling dynamic spatial processes: Simulation of urban future scenarios through cellular automata”Landscape and Urban Planning64145–160
6.
BattyM, 1998, “Urban evolution on the desktop: Simulation with the use of extended cellular automata”Environment and Planning A301943–1967
7.
BattyM, 2005a, “Agents, cells and cities; new representational models for simulating multiscale urban dynamics”Environment and Planning A371373–1394
8.
BattyM, 2005bCities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-based Models and Fractals (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
9.
BattyMLongleyP, 1994Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function (Academic Press, London)
10.
BattyMTorrensP M, 2005, “Modelling and prediction in a complex world”Futures37745–766
11.
BattyMXieYSunZ, 1999, “Modeling urban dynamics through GIS-based cellular automata”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems23205–233
12.
BehrensK, 2005, “Market size and industry location: Traded vs non-traded goods”Journal of Urban Economics5824–44
13.
BellMDeanCBlakeM, 2000, “Forecasting the pattern of urban growth with PUP: A web-based model interfaced with GIS and 3D animation”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems24559–581
14.
BenensonITorrensP M, 2004Geosimulation: Automata-based Modeling of Urban Phenomena (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)
15.
BenensonIOmerIHatnaE, 2002, “Entity-based modeling of urban residential dynamics: The case of Yaffo Tel Aviv”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design29491–512
16.
BenguiguiLCzamanskiDMarinovM, 2001, “City growth as a leap-frogging process: An application to the Tel-Aviv metropolis”Urban Studies381819–1839
17.
BrownD GPageSRioloRZellnerMRandW, 2005, “Path dependence and the validation of agent-based spatial models of land use”International Journal of Geographical Information System19153–174
18.
BurgessE W, 1925, “The growth of the city”, in The City Eds BurgessE WParkR (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) pp 47–62
19.
CapelloR, 2002, “Urban rent and urban dynamics: The determinants of urban development in Italy”The Annals of Regional Science36593–611
20.
ClarkeK CHoppenSGaydosL, 1997, “A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design24247–261
21.
ColbyC C, 1933, “Centripetal and centrifugal forces in urban geography”Annals of the Association of American Geographers231–20
22.
CostaHCostaGMendonçaJMonte-MórR, 2006Novas periferias metropolitanas: A expansão metropolitana em Belo Horizonte [New metropolitan periferies: The metropolitan expansion in Belo Horizonte: Dynamics and specificities of the South Axis] (C/Arte, Belo Horizonte)
23.
de NijsT C Mde NietRCrommentuijnL, 2004, “Constructing land-use maps of the Netherlands in 2030”Journal of Environmental Management7235–42
24.
DietzelCClarkeK, 2006, “The effect of disaggregating land use categories in cellular automata during model calibration and forecasting”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems3078–101
25.
EngelenGWhiteRUljeeIDrazanP, 1995, “Using cellular automata for integrated modelling of socio-environmental systems”Environmental Monitoring and Assessment30203–214
26.
EngelenGWhiteRUljeeIHagenAvan LoonJvan der MeulenM, 2004The Moland Model for Urban and Regional Growth (Research Institute for Knowledge Systems, Maastrich)
27.
FernandezL EBrownD GMaransR WNassauerJ I, 2005, “Characterizing location preferences in an exurban population: Implications for agent-based modelling”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design32799–820
28.
FurtadoB A, 2007, “Mercado imobiliário e a importância das características locais: Uma análise quantílico-espacial de preços hedônicos em Belo Horizonte”Análise Econômica (UFRGS)4771–98
29.
GlaeserE LGyourkoJSaksR E, 2005, “Urban growth and housing supply”Journal of Economic Geography671–89
30.
GouvêaR, 2005A questão metropolitana no Brasil [The metropolitan issue in Brazil] (FGV, Sao Paulo)
31.
Hagen-ZankerA, 2006, “Map comparison methods that simultaneously address overlap and structure”Journal of Geographical Systems8165–185
HeroldMCouclelisHClarkeK, 2005, “The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modeling of urban land use change”Computers Environment and Urban Systems29369–399
LauK HKamB H, 2005, “A cellular automata model for urban land-use simulation”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design32247–263
36.
LiXYehA G, 2000, “Modelling sustainable urban development by the integration of constrained cellular automata and GIS”International Journal of Geographical Information Science14131–152
37.
LiuYPhinnS R, 2003, “Modelling urban development with cellular automata incorporating fuzzy-set approaches”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems27637–658
38.
LongleyPBattyM, 2003Advanced Spatial Analysis: The CASA Book of GIS (ESRI Press, London)
39.
LynchK, 1960The Image of the City (Martins Fontes, São Paulo)
40.
McGarigalKCushmanSNeelMEneE, 2002FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical MapsUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
41.
O'SullivanD, 2009, “Changing neighborhoods—neighborhoods changing”Sociological Methods and Research37498–530
42.
PageS E, 1999, “On the emergence of cities”Journal of Urban Economics45184–208
43.
PinesDThisseJ F, 2001, “Urban systems: Market and efficiency”Journal of Public Economic Theory37–14
44.
PontiusRBoersmaWCastellaJ-CClarkeKde NijsTDietzelCDuanZFotsingEGoldsteinNKokKKoomenELippittCMcConnellWSoodMohd APijanowskiBPithadiaSSweeneySTrungTVeldkampAVerburgP, 2008, “Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change”The Annals of Regional Science4211–37
45.
PortugaliJ, 2000Self-organization and the City (Springer, Berlin)
46.
RIKS, 2005Metronamica: A Dynamic Spatial Land Use ModelRIKS BV, Maastrich
47.
RIKS, 2006Map Comparison Kit 3: User ManualRIKS BV, Maastricht
48.
RIKS, 2007aMetronamica Model DescriptionRIKS BV, Maastricht
49.
RIKS, 2007bMetronamica Data RequirementsRIKS BV, Maastricht
50.
SemboloniF, 1997, “An urban and regional model based on cellular automata”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design24589–612
51.
SemboloniFAssfalgJArmeniSGianassiRMarsoniF, 2004, “CityDev an interactive multi-agents urban model on the web”Computers Environment and Urban Systems2845–64
52.
SilvaE AClarkeK C, 2002, “Calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model for Lisbon and Porto, Portugal”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems26525–552
53.
TorrensP M, 2002, “Cellular automata and multi-agent systems as planning support tools”, in Planning Support Systems in Practice Eds GeertmanSStillwellJ (Springer, London) pp 205–222
54.
TorrensP M, 2006, “Simulating sprawl”Annals of the Association of American Geographers96248–275
55.
TorrensP M, 2007, “A geographic automata model of residential mobility”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design34200–222
56.
TorrensP MNaraA, 2007, “Modeling gentrification dynamics: A hybrid approach”Computers Environment and Urban Systems31337–361
57.
van DeldenHHagen-ZankerA, 2009, “New ways of supporting decision making: Linking qualitative storylines with quantitative modelling”, in Best Practice and New Methods in Planning Support Systems Ed. GeertmanJ C H (Springer, Dordrecht)
58.
VillaçaF, 1998Espaço intra-urbano no Brasil [Intra-urban space in Brazil] (Studio Nobel, São Paulo)
59.
WaddellPUlfarssonG FFranklinJ PLobbJ, 2007, “Incorporating land use in metropolitan transportation planning”Transportation Research41382–410
60.
WardD PMurrayA TPhinnS R, 2000, “A stochastically constrained cellular model of urban growth”Computers Environment and Urban Systems24539–558
61.
WhiteREngelenG, 1993, “Cellular automata and fractal urban form: A cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns”Environment and Planning A251175–1199
62.
WhiteREngelenGUljeeI, 1997, “The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modelling of urban land-use dynamics”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design24323–343
63.
WickramasuriyaR CBregtAvan DeldenHHagen-ZankerA, 2009, “The dynamics of shifting cultivation captured in an extended constrained cellular automata land use model”Ecological Modelling2202302–2309
64.
WuFWebsterC J, 1998, “Simulation of land development through the integration of cellular automata and multicriteria evaluation”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design25103–126
65.
YangCFujitaM, 1983, “Urban spatial structure with open space”Environment and Planning A1567–84
66.
ZhaoYMurayamaY A, 2011, “Modeling neighborhood interaction in cellular automata-based urban geosimulation”, in Spatial Analysis and Modelling in Geographical Transformation Process Eds MurayamaY AThapaR B (Springer, Dordrecht) pp 75–83
