Land-use data can accurately reflect spatial pattern dependence (ie, spatial autocorrelation) and a nonlinear relationship with driving variables. In this study land-use dynamics in the Paochiao Watershed, Taiwan are forcast for the next fifteen years by incorporating artificial neural networks with spatial autocorrelation (Auto-ANNs) into the conversion of land use and its effects (CLUE-s) model. In addition to spatial autocorrelations of land use, Auto-ANNs-CLUE-s considers the nonlinear relationships between driving factors and land-use patterns. Results of a three-map comparison indicate that the Auto-ANNs-CLUE-s model has a better overall performance than Auto-logistic-CLUE-s. The Auto-ANNs-CLUE-s is highly applicable for all resolutions from multiresolution validation. The results of landscape metrics demonstrate the prevalence of urban sprawl in the study area. The proposed model is an alternative means of improving land use and environmental planning.
AgarwalCGreenG MGroveJ MEvansT PSchweikC M, 2002A Review and Assessment of Land-use Change Models: Dynamics of Space, Time, and Human Choice Report NE-297, Northeastern Research Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr_ne297.pdf
2.
AraiTAkiyamaT, 2004, “Empirical analysis for estimating land use transition potential functions—case in the Tokyo metropolitan region”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems2865–84
3.
BettsM GDiamondA WForbesG J, 2006, “The importance of spatial autocorrelation, extent and resolution in predicting forest bird occurrence”Ecological Modelling191197–224
4.
BhatC RGuoJ, 2004, “A mixed spatially correlated logit model: Formulation and application to residential choice modeling”Transportation Research Part B: Methodological38147–168
5.
CastellaJ CVerburgP H, 2007, “Combination of process-oriented and pattern-oriented models of land-use change in a mountain area of Vietnam”Ecological Modelling202410–420
6.
ChenC HLiuW LLiawS L, 2005, “Development of a dynamic strategy planning theory and system for sustainable river basin land use management”Science of the Total Environment34617–37
7.
ChenHPontiusR GJr, 2010, “Diagnostic tools to evaluate a spatial land change projection along a gradient of an explanatory variable”Landscape Ecology251319–1331
8.
ClarkeK CGaydosL J, 1998, “Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: Long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore”International Journal of Geographical Information Science12699–714
9.
CostanzaR, 1989, “Model goodness of fit: A multiple resolution procedure”Ecological Modelling47199–215
10.
DaiEWuS HShiW Z, 2005, “Modeling change-pattern-value dynamics on land-use: An integrated GIS and Artificial Neural Networks approach”Environmental Assessment36576–591
11.
DendonckerNRounsevellMBogaertP, 2007, “Spatial analysis and modeling of land-use distributions in Belgium”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems31188–205
12.
DennisRShreeveTSparksTLhonoreJ, 2002, “A comparison of geographical and neighbourhood models for improving atlas databases: The case of the French butterfly atlas”Conservation Biology108143–159
13.
DeutschC VJournelA G, 1992GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide (Oxford University Press, New York)
14.
ElkieP CRempelR SCarrA P, 1999Patch Analyst User Manual: A Tool for Quantifying Landscape Structure Technical Manual TM-002, Northwest Science and Technology, Ministry of National Resources, Thunder Bay, Ontario
15.
FawcettT, 2006, “An introduction to ROC analysis”Pattern Recognition Letters27861–874
GS+, 2004, Geostatistics for the environmental sciences, Version 5.0, Gamma Design Software, Plainwell, MI
18.
HuangS LWangS HBuddW W, 2009, “Sprawl in Taipei's peri-urban zone: Responses to spatial planning and implications for adapting global environmental change”Landscape and Urban Planning9020–32
19.
HuangS YChengS JWenJ C, 2008, “Identifying peak-imperviousness-recurrence relationships on a growing-impervious watershed, Taiwan”Journal of Hydrology362320–336
20.
IrwinE GGeogheganJ, 2001, “Developing spatially explicit economic models of land use change”Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment857–23
21.
KlugWGrazianGGrippaGPierceDTassoneC, (Eds), 1992Evaluation of Long Range Atmospheric Transport Models Using Environmental Radioactivity Data from the Chernobyl Accident: The ATMES Report (Elsevier, Oxford)
22.
KoutsiasN, 2003, “An autologistic regression model for increasing the accuracy of burned surface mapping using landsat thematic mapper data”International Journal of Remote Sensing242199–2204
LiXYehA G, 2001, “Calibration of cellular automata by using neural networks for the simulation of complex urban systems”Environment and Planning A331445–1462
26.
LiXYehA G, 2002, “Neural-network-based cellular automata for simulating multiple land-use changes using GIS”International Journal of Geographical Information Systems16323–342
27.
LinY PChangT KWuC FChiangT CLinS H, 2006, “Assessing impacts of typhoons and the Chi-Chi earthquake on Chenyulan watershed landscape pattern in Central Taiwan using landscape metrics”Environmental Management38108–125
28.
LinY PLinY BWangY THongN M, 2008, “Monitoring and predicting land-use changes and the hydrology of the urbanized Paochiao watershed in Taiwan using remote sensing data, urban growth models and a hydrological model”Sensors8658–680
29.
LinY PVerburgP HChangC RChenH YChengM H, 2009, “Developing and comparing optimal and empirical land-use models for the development of an urbanized watershed forest in Taiwan”Landscape and Urban Planning92242–254
30.
LinY PChuH JWuC FVerburgP H, 2011, “Comparing model goodness of fit by logistic regression, auto-logistic regression and neural network models in empirical land-use change modeling”International Journal of Geographical Information Science25(1) 65–87
31.
LuoJWeiY H D, 2009, “Modeling spatial variations of urban growth patterns in Chinese cities: The case of Nanjing”Landscape and Urban Planning9151–64
32.
McGarigalKMarksB J, 1994FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure. Reference ManualForest Science Department, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, http://www.umass.edu/landeco/pubs/mcgarigal.marks:1995.pdf
33.
McMillenD P, 1992, “Probit with spatial autocorrelation”Journal of Regional Science32335–348
34.
McMillenD, 2001, “An empirical model of urban fringe land use”Land Economics65(2) 138–145
35.
MasJ FPuigHPalacioJ LSosa-LópezA, 2004, “Modelling deforestation using GIS and artificial neural networks”Environmental Modeling and Software19461–471
36.
MillerJFranklinJAspinallR, 2007, “Incorporating spatial dependence in predictive vegetation models”Ecological Modelling202225–242
37.
NegnevitskyM, 2002Artificial Intelligence: A Guide to Intelligent Systems (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA)
38.
OvermarsKde KoningGVeldkampA, 2003, “Spatial autocorrelation in multi-scale land use models”Ecological Modelling164257–270
39.
PaezA, 2007, “Spatial perspectives on urban systems: Developments and directions”Journal of Geographical Systems91–6
40.
PijanowskiB CBrownD GShellitoB AManikG A, 2002, “Using neural networks and GIS to forecast land-use changes: A land transformation model”Computers, Environment and Urban Systems26553–575
41.
PijanowskiB CPithadiaSShellitoB A, 2005, “Calibrating a neural network-based urban change model for two metropolitan areas of the Upper Midwest of the United States”International Journal of Geographical Information Science19197–215
42.
PinkseJSladeM E, 1998, “Contracting in space: An application of spatial statistics to discrete-choice models”Journal of Econometrics85125–154
43.
PioreckyM DPrescottD R C, 2006, “Multiple spatial scale logistic and auto-logistic habitat selection models for northern pygmy owls, along the eastern slopes of Alberta's Rocky Mountains”Biological Conservation129360–371
44.
PontiusR GJrBatchuK, 2003, “Using the relative operating characteristic to quantify certainty in prediction of location of land cover change in India”Transactions in GIS7467–484
45.
PontiusR GJrLippittC D, 2006, “Can error explain map differences over time?”Cartography and Geographic Information Science33(2) 159–171
46.
PontiusRBoersmaWCastellaJ CClarkeKde NijsTDietzelCDuanZFostingEGoldsteinNKokKKoomaELippettC DMcConnellWSoodA MPijanowskiBPithadiaSSweeneySTrungT NVeldkampA MVerburgP H, 2008, “Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change”The Annals of Regional Science4211–37
47.
PontiusR GJrPeethambaramSCastellaJ C, 2011, “Comparison of three maps at multiple resolutions: A case study of land change simulation in Cho Don District, Vietnam”Annals of the Association of American Geographers10145–62
48.
SwetsJ A, 1988, “Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems”Science2401285–1293
49.
TsaiB WChangK TChangC Y, 2006, “Analyzing spatial and temporal changes of aquaculture in Yunlin County, Taiwan”The Professional Geographer58161–171
50.
TsuyukiS S, 2008, “GIS-based modeling of Javan Hawk-Eagle distribution using logistic and auto-logistic regression models”Biological Conservation141756–769
51.
TurnerBSkoleDSandersonSFischerGFrescoLLeemansR, 1995Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC): Science/Research Plan I HDP Report No. 7, IGBP Secretariat, Stockholm
52.
VeldkampAFrescoL O, 1996, “CLUE: A conceptual model to study the conversion of land use and its effects”Ecological Modelling85253–270
53.
VerburgP HSoepboerWVeldkampALimpiadaREspaldonVMasturaS A Sharifah, 2002, “Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land-use: The CLUES model”Environmental Management30391–405
54.
VerburgP Hvan EckJ R Rde NijsT C M, 2004, “Determinants of land-use change patterns in the Netherlands”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design31125–150
55.
VerburgP HKokKPontiusR GJrVeldkampA, 2006, “Modeling land-use and land-cover change”, in Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: Local Processes and Global Impacts Eds LambinE FGeistH J, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin)
56.
WangXKockelmanK, 2006, “Tracking land cover change in a mixed logit model: Recognizing temporal and spatial effects”Transportation Research Recordnumber 1977, 112–120
57.
WangX KKockelmanK M, 2009, “Application of the dynamic spatial ordered probit model: Patterns of land development change in Austin, Texas”Papers in Regional Science88345–365
58.
WuD QLiuJZhangG SDingWWangWWangR, 2009, “Incorporating spatial autocorrelation into cellular automata model: An application to the dynamics of Chinese tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis Lour.)”Ecological Modelling2203490–3498
59.
WuHHufferF W, 1997, “Modeling the distribution of plant species using the autologistic regression model”Environmental and Ecological Statistics449–64
60.
ZhouBKockelmanK, 2008, “Neighborhood impacts on land use change: A multinomial logit model of spatial relationships”Annals of Regional Science42321–340
