Many longitudinal analyses of residential mobility decision making use two or three waves of panel survey data to investigate who fulfils their moving desires. Few studies have, however, focused upon individuals who desire to move but who remain residentially immobile, either because it takes them a long time to relocate or because they abandon their moving desire. This is problematic, as undesired residential immobility could have negative consequences for individual well-being and prosperity. To address this research gap, this study uses 1991–2008 British Household Panel Survey data to analyse the duration and abandonment of moving desires. Importantly, the results show that the risk of abandoning a desire to move rises dramatically with age, suggesting that the well-documented residential rootedness of older people is not solely volitional. Event-history analysis shows that these patterns are partly due to changing levels of ties and commitments over the life course. By demonstrating that ethnicity and income are also linked to the fulfilment of moving desires, the findings contribute to our understanding of the processes producing both social inequality and neighbourhood stratification.
Box-SteffensmeierJJonesB, 2004Event History Modelling: A Guide for Social Scientists (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
3.
BrownLAMooreEG, 1970, “The intra-urban migration process: A perspective”Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography521–13
4.
BuckN, 2000, “Using panel surveys to study migration and residential mobility”, in Researching Social and Economic Change: The Uses of Household Panel Studies Ed. RoseD, (Routledge, London) pp 250–272
5.
ClarkWAVDielemanF, 1996Households and Housing: Choice and Outcomes in the Housing Market (Centre for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, NJ)
6.
ClarkWAVHuangY, 2004, “Linking migration and mobility: Individual and contextual effects in housing markets in the UK”Regional Studies38617–628
7.
CookeT, 2011, “It is not just the economy: Declining migration and the rise of secular rootedness”Population, Space and Place17193–203
8.
CoulterRvan HamMFeijtenP, 2011, “A longitudinal analysis of moving desires, expectations and actual moving behaviour”Environment and Planning A432742–2760
9.
CoulterRvan HamMFeijtenP, 2012, “Partner (dis)agreement on moving desires and the subsequent moving behaviour of couples”Population, Space and Place1816–30
10.
De GrootCMulderCDasMMantingD, 2011, “Life events and the gap between intention to move and actual mobility”Environment and Planning A4348–66
11.
De JongGFawcettJ, 1981, “Motivations for migration: An assessment and a value-expectancy research model”, in Migration Decision Making: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Microlevel Studies in Developed and Developing Countries Eds De JongGFawcettJ, (Pergamon, Oxford) pp 13–58
12.
FeijtenP, 2005Life Events and the Housing Career: A Retrospective Analysis of Timed Effects (Eburon, Delft)
13.
FerreiraFGyourkoJTracyJ, 2010, “Housing busts and household mobility”Journal of Urban Economics6834–45
14.
FerreiraPTaylorM, 2009, “Residential mobility, mobility preferences and psychological health”, in Changing Relationships Eds BryninMErmischJ, (Routledge, Oxford) pp 161–179
15.
FestingerLRieckenHSchachterS, 1956When Prophecy Fails: A Social and Psychological Study of a Modern Group that Predicted the Destruction of the World (Harper and Row, New York)
16.
FischerCS, 2002, “Ever-more rooted Americans”City and Community1177–198
17.
HackerR, 2000, “Mobility and regional economic downturns”Journal of Regional Science4045–65
18.
HalfacreeKBoyleP, 1993, “The challenges facing migration research: The case for a biographical approach”Progress in Human Geography17333–348
19.
HansonS, 2005, “Perspectives on the geographic stability and mobility of people in cities”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America10215301–15306
20.
KingR, 2012, “Geography and migration studies: Retrospect and prospect”Population, Space and Place18134–153
21.
KleyS, 2011, “Explaining the stages of migration within a life-course framework”European Sociological Review27469–486
22.
LandaleNSGuestAM, 1985, “Constraints, satisfaction and residential mobility: Speare's model reconsidered”Demography22199–222
23.
LittlewoodAMunroM, 1997, “Moving and improving: Strategies for attaining housing equilibrium”Urban Studies341771–1787
24.
LongJSFreeseJ, 2006Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata2nd edition (Stata Press, College Station, TX)
25.
LuM, 1998, “Analyzing migration decision making: Relationships between residential satisfaction, mobility intentions, and moving behavior”Environment and Planning A301473–1495
26.
LuM, 1999, “Do people move when they say they will? Inconsistencies in individual migration behavior”Population amd Environment20467–488
27.
MasonJ, 2004, “Personal narratives, relational selves: Residential histories in the living and telling”The Sociological Review52162–179
28.
MulderC, 1996, “Housing choice: Assumptions and approaches”Journal of Housing and the Built Environment11209–232
29.
MulderCHooimeijerP, 1999, “Residential relocations in the life course”, in Population Issues: An Interdisciplinary Focus Eds van WissenLDykstraP, (Plenum, New York) pp 159–186
30.
NiedomyslT, 2011, “How migration motives change over migration distance: Evidence on variation across socio-economic and demographic groups”Regional Studies45843–855
31.
RabeB, 2012, “Moving home: Wishes, expectations and reasons”, in Understanding Society: Findings 2012 Ed. McFallS, (University of Essex, Colchester, Essex) pp 21–22
32.
RabeBTaylorM, 2010, “Residential mobility, quality of neighbourhood and life course events”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A173531–555
33.
RossiPH, 1955Why Families Move: A Study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility (Free Press, Glencoe, IL)
34.
SeaversJ, 1999, “Residential relocation of couples: The joint decision-making process considered”, in Migration and Gender in the Developed World Eds BoylePHalfacreeK, (Routledge, London) pp 151–171
35.
SellRDe JongG, 1983, “Deciding whether to move: Mobility, wishful thinking and adjustment”Sociology and Social Research67146–165
36.
ShellerMUrryJ, 2006, “The new mobilities paradigm”Environment and Planning A38207–226
37.
SingerJDWillettJB, 2003, Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modelling Change and Event Occurrence (Oxford University Press, Oxford)
38.
SpeareAGoldsteinSFreyW, 1975Residential Mobility, Migration, and Metropolitan Change (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA)
39.
TaylorMF, (Ed.) with Brice J, Buck N, Prentice-Lane E, 2010British Household Panel Survey User Manual Volume A: Introduction, Technical Report and Appendices (University of Essex, Colchester, Essex)
40.
UhrigSCN, 2008, “The nature and causes of attrition in the British Household Panel Survey”, WP 2008-05, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex
41.
van der LandMDoffW, 2010, “Voice, exit and efficacy: Dealing with perceived neighbourhood decline without moving out”Journal of Housing and the Built Environment25429–445
42.
WheatonW, 1990, “Vacancy, search, and prices in a housing market matching model”Journal of Political Economy981270–1292
