The paper reflects on the methodological challenges involved in research on the movement and mutation of fast-moving policies, through globalizing networks and across translocal settings. Inspired by ‘follow the thing’ methods and by the global ethnography program, it outlines a distended case-study approach to the study of policy mobilities.
BairJWernerM, 2011, “Commodity chains and the uneven geographies of global capitalism: A disarticulations perspective”Environment and Planning A43988–997.
BurawoyM, 1998, “The extended case method”Sociological Theory164–33.
4.
BurawoyM, 2001, “Manufacturing the global”Ethnography2147–159.
5.
BurawoyM, 2009The Extended Case Method: Four Countries, Four Decades, Four Great Transformations and One Theoretical Tradition (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
6.
BurawoyMBlumJ AGeorgeSGilleZGowanTHaneyLKlawitterMLopezSRiainS OThayerM, 2000Global Ethnography (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
7.
CzarniawskaB, 2010, “The uses of narratology in social and policy studies”Critical Policy Studies458–76.
8.
DjelicM-LSahlin-AnderssonK (Eds), 2006Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
9.
DolowitzDMarshD, 2000, “Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making”Governance135–24.
10.
DunnE, 2007, “Of pufferfish and ethnography: Plumbing new depths in economic geography”, in Politics and Practice in Economic Geography Eds TickellASheppardEPeckJBarnesT J (Sage, London) pp 82–93.
11.
EliasophNLichtermenP, 1999, “‘We begin with our favorite theory’: Reconstructing the extended case method”Sociological Theory17228–234.
12.
EvensTMSHandelmanD (Eds), 2006, The Manchester School: Practice and Ethnographic Praxis in Anthropology (Berghahn Books, Oxford).
13.
FergusonJGuptaA2002, “Spatializing states: Toward an ethnography of neoliberal governmentality”American Ethnologist29981–1002.
14.
FischerF, 2003Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
FreidbergS, 2001, “On the trail of the global green bean: Methodological considerations in multi-site ethnography”Global Networks1353–368.
17.
GoldmanM, 2005Imperial Nature: The World Bank and Struggles for Social Justice in the Age of Globalization (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).
18.
GonzálezS, 2011, “Bilbao and Barcelona ‘in motion’: How urban regeneration ‘models’ travel and mutate in the global flows of policy tourism”Urban Studies481397–1418.
19.
HallP A, 1993, “Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain”Comparative Politics25275–296.
20.
HandelmanD, 2006, “The extended case: Interactional foundations and prospective methods”, in The Manchester School: Practice and Ethnographic Praxis in Anthropology Eds EvensTMSHandelmanD (Berghahn Books, New York) pp 94–117.
21.
HartG, 2004, “Geography and development: Critical ethnographies”Progress in Human Geography2891–100.
22.
JessopB, 2009, “Cultural political economy and critical policy studies”Critical Policy Studies3336–356.
23.
KuusM, 2010, “Fieldwork in geopolitics? On access and engagement”, mimeo, Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
24.
LatourB, 1987, Science in Action (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
25.
McCannE J, 2008, “Expertise, truth, and urban policy mobilities: Global circuits of knowledge in the development of Vancouver, Canada's ‘four pillars’ drug strategy”Environment and Planning A40885–904.
26.
McCannE J, 2011, “Urban policy mobilities and global circuits knowledge: Toward a research agenda”Annals of the Association of American Geographers101107–130.
27.
McCannEWardK (Eds), 2011, Mobile Urbanism: Cities and Policymaking in the Global Age (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
28.
McFarlaneC, 2011Learning the City: Knowledge and Translocal Assemblage (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford).
29.
MarcusG, 1998, Ethnography Through Thick and Thin (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
30.
MorganM S, 2008, “‘On a mission’ with mutable mobiles”, working papers on the nature of evidence, 34/08, Department of Economic History, London School of Economics and Political Science.
31.
MosseD, 2004, “Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice”Development and Change35639–671.
32.
PeckJ, 2005, “Economic sociologies in space”Economic Geography81129–176.
33.
PeckJ, 2011a, “Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation”Progress in Human Geography forthcoming.
34.
PeckJ, 2011b, “Recreative city: Amsterdam, vehicular ideas, and the adaptive spaces of creativity policy”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research forthcoming.
35.
PeckJTheodoreN, 2010a, “Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations”Geoforum41169–174.
36.
PeckJTheodoreN, 2010b, “Recombinant workfare, across the Americas: Transnationalizing ‘fast’ social policy”Geoforum41195–208.
37.
PollittC RHarrisonSHunterDMarnochG, 1990, “No hiding place: On the discomforts of researching the contemporary policy process”Journal of Social Policy19169–190.
38.
RobertsonD B, 1991, “Political conflict and lesson-drawing”Journal of Public Policy1155–78.
39.
RoyA, 2010Poverty Capital: Microfinance and the Making of Development (Routledge, New York).
40.
SchoenbergerE, 1991, “The corporate interview as a research method in economic geography”The Professional Geographer43180–189.
41.
ShoreCWrightSPeroD (Eds), 2011, Policy Worlds (Berghahn Books, New York).
42.
SimmonsB ADobbinFGarrettG (Eds), 2008The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy (Cambridge University Press, New York).
43.
SossJ, 2006, “Talking our way to meaningful explanations: A practice-centered approach to in-depth interviews for interpretive research”, in Interpretation and Method Eds YanowDSchwartz-SheaP (M E Sharpe, New York) pp 127–149.
44.
TheodoreNPeckJ, 2012, “Framing neoliberal urbanism: Translating ‘common sense’ urban policy across the OECD zone”European Urban and Regional Studies forthcoming.
45.
TsingA L, 2004Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
46.
VenessonP, 2008, “Case studies and process tracing: Theories and practices”, in Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective Eds Della-PortaDKeatingM (Cambridge Universty Press, Cambridge) pp 223–240.
47.
WalkerJ L, 1969, “The diffusion of innovations among the American states”American Political Science Review63880–899.
48.
WedelJShoreCFeldmanGLathropS, 2005, “Toward an anthropology of public policy”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science60030–51.
49.
YanowD, 2007, “Interpretation in policy analysis: On methods and practice”Critical Policy Analysis1110–122.
