The recent interest in the role of transport in social interactions has been partly motivated by the hope of achieving a better understanding of the role that transport plays in network capital, or the resources that people can gather from their social networks. Despite the relevancy of this question for policy, little empirical work has been done to elucidate this relationship. This paper illustrates a method of data collection and analysis, using the social networks approach to assess the role of transport in social support, both emotional and material. The personal networks of two neighbourhoods in Concepción, Chile, with different income levels, are compared, focusing on the role of car ownership in network capital, and the relevance of the time and space characteristics of social contacts. The results suggest that having a car at home does not lead to homogeneous access to network capital, which depends heavily on the kind of social resource studied and the income context (neighbourhood) in which the individuals are embedded. The findings also underscore the need to treat social capital as a truly multidimensional concept and the usefulness of the personal networks approach for assessing these complex relationships.
AxhausenK W, 2000, “Geographies of somewhere: a review of urban literature”Urban Studies371849–1864
2.
AxhausenK W, 2005, “Social networks and travel: some hypotheses”, in Social Aspects of Sustainable Transport: Transatlantic Perspectives Ed. DonaghyK (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 90–108
3.
AxhausenK W, 2008, “Accessibility: long-term perspectives”Journal of Transport and Land Use15–22
4.
BoaseJHorriganJ BWellmanBRainieL, 2006, “The strength of Internet ties: the Internet and email aid users in maintaining their social networks and provide pathways to help when people face big decisions”, Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC
5.
BourdieuP, 1986, “The forms of social capital”, in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (Greenwood, Westport, CT) pp 241–258
6.
BuliungRKanaroglouP, 2007, “Activity–travel behaviour research: conceptual issues, state of the art, and emerging perspectives for behavioural analysis and simulation modelling”Transport Reviews27151–187
7.
CarrascoJ AMillerE J, 2006, “Exploring the propensity to perform social activities: a social networks approach”Transportation33463–480
8.
CarrascoJ AMillerE J, 2009, “The social dimension in action: a multilevel, personal networks model of social activity frequency”Transportation Research A4390–104
9.
CarrascoJ AHoganBWellmanBMillerE J, 2008, “Collecting social network data to study social activity–travel behaviour: an egocentred approach”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design35961–980
10.
ChapinF S, 1974Human Activity Patterns in the City: Things People do in Time and in Space (John Wiley, New York)
11.
ColemanJ, 1988, “Social capital in the creation of human capital”American Journal of Sociology94S95–S120
12.
CurrieGStanleyJ, 2008, “Investigating links between social capital and public transport”Transport Reviews28529–547
13.
DoiKKiiMNakanishiH, 2008, “An integrated evaluation method of accessibility, quality of life, and social interaction”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design351098–1116
14.
DugundjiEPáezAArentzeT, 2008, “Social networks, choices, mobility, and travel”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design35956–960
15.
FarberSPáezA, 2009, “My car, my friends, and me: a preliminary analysis of automobility and social activity participation”Journal of Transport Geography17216–225
16.
FigueroaO, 2005, “Transporte urbano y globalización: políticas y efectos en América Latina”Eure3141–53
17.
FischerC, 1982To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL)
18.
FischerC, 2005, “Bowling alone: what's the score”Social Networks27155–167
19.
FreemanL, 1979, “Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification”Social Networks1215–239
20.
GranovetterM, 1973, “The strength of weak ties”American Journal of Sociology781360–1380
21.
HartellA M, 2008, “Is inadequate transportation a barrier to community involvement? Evidence from the Social Capital Benchmark Survey”Transportation Research Record number 2067, 11–16
22.
HoganBCarrascoJ AWellmanB, 2007, “Visualizing personal networks: working with participant-aided sociograms”Field Methods19116–144
23.
JohnsonVCurrieGStanleyJ, 2010, “Measures of disadvantage: is car ownership a good indicator?”Social Indicators Research doi: 10.1007/s11205-11009-19510-11201
LinN, 1999, “Social networks and status attainment”Annual Review of Sociology25467–487
26.
LinN, 2008, “A network theory of social capital”, in Handbook on Social Capital Eds CastiglioneDvan DethJWollebG (Oxford University Press, Oxford) pp 50–69
27.
MarsdenP V, 2005, “Recent developments in network measurement”, in Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis Eds CarringtonPScottJWassermanS (Cambridge University Press, New York) pp 8–30
28.
MiltonJ SArnoldJ, 2003Introduction to Probability and Statistics: Principles and Applications for Engineering and the Computing Sciences (McGraw-Hill, Toronto)
29.
MokDWellmanBCarrascoJ A, 2010, “Does distance still matter in connected lives? A pre- and post-Internet comparison”Urban Studies472747–2784
30.
MuñozJ COrtúzarJ d DGschwenderA, 2008, “Transantiago: the fall and rise of a radical public transport intervention”, in Travel Demand Management and Road User Pricing: Success, Failure and Feasibility Eds SalehWSammerG (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants) pp 151–172
31.
OwenA LViderasJ, 2009, “Reconsidering social capital: a latent class approach”Empirical Economics37555–582
32.
PhillipsonCAllanGMorganD, 2004Social Networks and Social Exclusion: Sociological and Policy Perspectives (Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants)
33.
PlickertGCôtéRWellmanB, 2007, “It's not who you know, it's how you know them: who exchanges what with whom?”Social Networks29405–429
34.
PortesA, 1998, “Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology”Annual Review of Sociology241–24
35.
PutnamR, 2000Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (Simon and Schuster, New York)
36.
RasbashJBrowneWSteeleF, 2003, “A user's guide to MLwiN version 2.0.”, Centre for Multilevel Modelling, London
37.
StanleyJVella-BrodrickD, 2009, “The usefulness of social exclusion to inform social policy in transport”Transport Policy1690–96
38.
TillemaTDijstMSchwanenT, 2008, “Electronic communication in social networks and implications for travel”, in 87th Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board Washington, DC, 13–17 January
39.
TindallDWellmanB, 2001, “Canada as social structure: social network analysis and Canadian sociology”Canadian Journal of Sociology26265–308
40.
UrryJ, 2002, “Mobility and proximity”Sociology36255–274
41.
UrryJ, 2003, “Social networks, travel, and talk”British Journal of Sociology54155–175
42.
Van DuijnM A JVan BusschbachJ TSnijdersT A B, 1999, “Multilevel analysis of personal networks as dependent variables”Social Networks21187–209
43.
WassermanSFaustK, 1994Social Network Analysis (Cambridge University Press, New York)
44.
WellmanB, 2001, “Physical space and cyberspace: the rise of personalized networking”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research25227–252
45.
WellmanBBerkowitzS D, 1988Social Structures: A Network Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
46.
WellmanBFrankK A, 2001, “Network capital in a multilevel world: getting support from personal communities”, in Social Capital: Theory and Research Eds LinNBurtR SCookeK (Aldine De Gruyter, Hawthorne, NY) pp 233–273
47.
WellmanBWortleyS, 1990, “Different strokes from different folks: community ties and social support”American Journal of Sociology96558–588
48.
YagoG, 1983, “The sociology of transportation”Annual Review of Sociology9171–190
49.
ZegrasC, 2003, “Financing transport infrastructure in developing country cities”Transportation Research Record number 1839, 81–88
