A large literature establishes the role of mobility in the maintenance of neighborhood social structures. Jane Jacobs famously argued that social capital is maintained through “cross-use of space,” and James Coleman formalized its dependence on the “closure” of human interactions. Since many of these interactions entail human movement, neighborhoods with higher social capital should be distinguishable by more cohesive mobility networks. I observe the mobility of Chicago residents through a large dataset of smartphone users. I construct a neighborhood-level mobility network for the city and characterize neighborhoods according to their local graph structure. Neighborhoods that are well integrated with their surroundings have higher income and educational attainment. Consistent with social capital theory and routine activity theory in criminology, higher local network integration independently predicts lower levels of violent and property crime. The methodologies presented provide a meaningful, replicable, and inexpensive approach to the structural measurement of neighborhood networks and social structure.
AnselinLReySJ (2014) Modern Spatial Econometrics in Practice: A Guide to GeoDa, GeoDaSpace and PySAL.
Chicago:
GeoDa Press LLC. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?id=MBLwrQEACAAJ (accessed 29 July 2020).
BrowningCRCalderCABoettnerB, et al. (2017a)
Ecological networks and urban crime: The structure of shared routing activity locations and neighborhood-level informal control capacity. Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal55(4): 754–778.
9.
BrowningCRCalderCAKrivoLJ, et al. (2017b)
Socioeconomic segregation of activity spaces in urban neighborhoods: Does shared residence mean shared routines?The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences3(2): 210–231.
10.
BrowningCRCalderCASollerB, et al. (2017c)
Ecological networks and neighborhood social organization. American Journal of Sociology122(6): 1939–1988.
11.
BrowningCRSollerB (2014)
Moving beyond neighborhood: Activity spaces and ecological networks as contexts for youth development. Cityscape9(1): 165–196. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4121985/ (accessed 29 July 2020).
12.
CohenLEFelsonM (1979)
Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review44(4): 588–608.
13.
ColemanJS (1988)
Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology94: S95–S120.
14.
EagleNMacyMClaxtonR (2010)
Network diversity and economic development. Science (New York, N.Y.)328(5981): 1029–1031.
ForrestRKearnsA (2001)
Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies38(12): 2125–2143.
18.
GrahamMRKutzbachMJMcKenzieB (2014) Design comparison of LODES and ACS commuting data products (CES 14-38). Suitland, MD: Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: ftp://ftp2.census.gov/ces/wp/2014/CES-WP-14-38.pdf (accessed 29 July 2020).
19.
GraifCFreelinBNKuoY-H, et al. (2019)
Network spillovers and neighborhood crime: A computational statistics analysis of employment-based networks of neighborhoods. Justice Quarterly0(0): 1–31.
20.
GraifCGladfelterASMatthewsSA (2014)
Urban poverty and neighborhood effects on crime: Incorporating spatial and network perspectives. Sociology Compass8(9): 1140–1155.
21.
GraifCLungeanuAYetterAM (2017)
Neighborhood isolation in Chicago: Violent crime effects on structural isolation and homophily in inter-neighborhood commuting networks. Social Networks51: 40–59.
22.
GranovetterMS (1973)
The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–1380.
23.
HeitzigJDongesJFZouY, et al. (2012)
Node-weighted measures for complex networks with spatially embedded, sampled, or differently sized nodes. The European Physical Journal B85(1): 38.
24.
JacobsJ (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities (Kindle Edition). New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
25.
LazerDPentlandAAdamicL, et al. (2009) Computational social science. Science (New York, N.Y.) 323(5915): 721–723.
26.
LenormandMPicornellMCantú-RosOG, et al. (2014)
Cross-checking different sources of mobility information. PLoS One9(8): 1–10.
27.
LeviJ (1961) The Neighborhood Program of the University of Chicago.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
28.
MorenoffJDSampsonRJRaudenbushSW (2001)
Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology39(3): 517–558.
PappalardoLVanhoofMGabrielliL, et al. (2016)
An analytical framework to nowcast well-being using mobile phone data. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics2(1): 75–92.
31.
ParkREBurgessEW (1925) The City (Heritage of Sociology Series) (Kindle Edition). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
PhillipsNELevyBLSampsonRJ, et al. (2019)
The social integration of American cities: Network measures of connectedness based on everyday mobility across neighborhoods. Sociological Methods & Research0(0): 1–40.
34.
PutnamRD (1995)
Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy6(1): 65–78. Available at: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/16643
35.
RaudenbushSWSampsonRJ (1999)
Ecometrics: Toward a science of assessing ecological settings, with application to the systematic social observation of neighborhoods. Sociological Methodology29(1): 1–41.
36.
SampsonRJ (2011) Neighborhood effects, causal mechanisms and the social structure of the city. In: Pierre D (ed) Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.227–249.
37.
SampsonRJ (2012) Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect (Kindle Edition). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
SaramäkiJKiveläMOnnelaJ-P, et al. (2007)
Generalizations of the clustering coefficient to weighted complex networks. Physical Review E75(2): 027105.
39.
SmallML (2009) Unanticipated Gains: Origins of Network Inequality in Everyday Life (Kindle Edition). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
40.
Tobler W (1970)
A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography46: 234–240.
41.
TooleJLHerrera-YaqüeCSchneiderCM, et al. (2015)
Coupling human mobility and social ties. Journal of the Royal Society Interface12. 20141128.http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.1128.
42.
WangQPhillipsNESmallML, et al. (2018)
Urban mobility and neighborhood isolation in America’s 50 largest cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America115(30): 7735–7740.
43.
WinlingLC (2017) Building the Ivory Tower: Universities and Metropolitan Development in the Twentieth Century. Politics and Culture in Modern America.
Philadelphia:
University of Pennsylvania Press. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?id=SlQ1DwAAQBAJ (accessed 29 July 2020).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
