Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Marked-based reforms in education have garnered the support of politicians, philanthropists, and academics, reworking the nature of public education in the United States. In this paper we explore the methods used to produce consent for market-based reforms of primary and secondary (K-12) schooling in the United States, focusing on two case studies to interrogate how this consent is generated as well as how these reforms are resisted in place. In doing so we illustrate how market-making in public services is a contested terrain and the importance of understanding the nature of their roll-out at the local level.

Keywords

education marketization primary and secondary schooling charter schools mayoral control

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahearne T, 2012, “Summary of Washington Supreme Court's decision in McCleary vs. Washington” Network for Excellence in Washington Schools, http://www.tacoma.k12.wa.us/information/Documents/McCleary%20Supreme%20Court%20Decision%20Explained.pdf

Apple

M W

(2005) “Are markets in education democratic? Neoliberal globalism, vouchers, and the politics of choice”. In: Apple

M W

Kenway

Singh

(eds) Globalizing Education: Policies, Pedagogies, and Politics, New York: Peter Lang Publishing, pp. 209–230

Ball

(2012) “The reluctant state and the beginning of the end of state education”. Journal of Educational Administration and History 44: 89–103

Bayer H, 2013, “Debate in NYC shows the true democratic power of Mayoral control” StudentsFirst http://www.studentsfirst.org/blog/entry/debate-in-nyc-shows-the-true-democratic-power-of-mayoral-control

Bernard Center, 2012, “School choice: education equality now”, 8 February, http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=wLqcGb4WAtk

Block

(2011) “Contesting markets all the way down”. Journal of Australian Political Economy 68: 27–40

Burch

(2009) Hidden Markets: The New Education Privatization, New York: Routledge

Campanile C, 2009, “Gates' $4 mil lesson aided school control” New York Post 18 August, http://www.nypost.com/p/news/regional/item_ekjA6OeXIrxZjDATHPbkuJ

City of Seattle, 2014, “The Greater Seattle Datasheet”, http://www.seattle.gov/oir/datasheet/demographics.htm

10.

Connecticut Post 2012, “Timeline: Bridgeport school board saga”, 28 February http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Timeline-Bridgeport-school-board-saga-3367920.php

11.

Cook

Ward

(2012) “Conferences, international infrastructures and mobile policies: the process of getting Sweden ‘BID ready’ ”. European Urban and Regional Studies 19: 137–152

12.

Dillon S, 2011, “Behind grass-roots school advocacy, Bill Gates” New York Times 21 May, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/22/education/22gates.html

13.

Education Reform Act (1988) Public General Acts—Elizabeth II, London: HMSOchapter 40

14.

Eidelson J, 2012, “ ‘Elections shouldn't exist’: the new war on school boards” Salon 31 December, http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/elections_shouldnt_exist_the_new_war_on_school_boards/

15.

Fact Check Washington, 2012, “I-1240 (Charter Schools)”, http://factcheckwa.org/initiatives/2012-i-1240/

16.

Fang L, 2011, “How online learning companies bought America's schools” The Nation 16 November, http://www.thenation.com/print/article/164651/how-onlinelearning-companies-bought-americas-schools

17.

Fraser

Gordon

(1994) “A genealogy of dependency: tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state”. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 19: 309–336

18.

Goldstein

(2010) “Imaging the frame: media representations of teachers, their unions, NCLB, and education reform”. Educational Policy 25: 543–576

19.

Gulson

Webb

(2013) “ ‘A raw, emotional thing:’ school choice, commodification, and the racialised branding of Afrocentricity in Toronto, Canada”. Education Inquiry 4(1): 167–187

20.

Hankins

(2005) “Practicing citizenship in new spaces: rights and realities of charter school activism”. Space and Polity 9(1): 41–60

21.

Hanson Thiem

(2009) “Thinking through education: the geographies of contemporary educational restructuring”. Progress in Human Geography 33: 154–173

22.

Henig

J R

(2009) “Mayors, governors, and presidents: the new education executives and the end of educational exceptionalism”. Peabody Journal of Education 84: 283–299

23.

Hill

P T

(2014) Governing Schools for Productivity, Dallas, TX: George W Bush Institute

24.

Holloway

S L

Pimlott-Wilson

(2012) “Neoliberalism, policy localisation and idealised subjects: a case study on educational restructuring in England”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 37: 639–654

25.

Hu W, Davey J, 2011, “State to appoint new board of education in Bridgeport” The New York Times 21 July, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/07/nyregion/next-bridgeport-conn-board-of-education-to-beappointed-by-state.html?_r=0

26.

Johnson K, Villaraigosa A, Cornett M, 2013, “America's mayors leading on education reform” Politico http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/american-mayors-education-reform-opinion-93280.html

27.

Lambeck L C, 2011, “Outside interests were working behind the scenes to reconstitute school board” Connecticut Post 4 August, http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Outside-interests-were-workingbehind-the-scenes-1718684.php#page-1

28.

Lambeck L C, 2012, “Bridgeport keeps right to vote for school board” Connecticut Post 6 November, http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Bridgeport-keeps-right-to-vote-for-school-board-4014574.php

29.

Lecker W, 2012, “Wendy Lecker: Bridgeport takeover try a cautionary tale” Connecticut Post 7 March, http://www.ctpost.com/opinion/article/Wendy-Lecker-Bridgeport-takeover-try-a-3389358.php#ixzz1oUhlOJtq

30.

Lipman

(2011) The New Political Economy of Urban Education: Neoliberalism, Race, and the Right to the City, New York: Routledge

31.

Lipman

(2013) “Economic crisis, accountability, and the state's coercive assault on public education in the USA”. Journal of Education Policy 28: 557–573

32.

Lizotte

(2013) “The moral imperatives of geographies of school failure: mobilizing market-based reform coalitions”. The Canadian Geographer 57: 289–295

33.

Lockhart B, 2012, “North End Community Council opposes appointed ed board” Connecticut Postings 23 July, http://well.blogs.nytimes.com

34.

Lubienski

(2005) “Public schools in marketized environments: shifting incentives and unintended consequences of competition-based educational reforms”. American Journal of Education 111: 464–486

35.

McCann

(2011) “Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101: 107–130

36.

McGuinn

(2012) “Stimulating reform: race to the top, competitive grants and the Obama education agenda”. Educational Policy 26(1): 136–159

37.

Mitchell

Lizotte

(2014) “The grassroots and the gift: philanthropy, neoliberal morality, and activism in education”. Foucault Studies 18: 66–89

38.

Moyers B, 2012, “United States of Alec” Democracy Now 27 September, http://www.democracynow.org/2012/9/27/the_united_states_of_alec_bill

39.

National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, 2013, “Measuring up to the model: a tool for comparing state charter school laws”, http://www.publiccharters.org/law/ViewState.aspx?state=WA

40.

National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983) A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office

41.

Our Schools Coalition, 2010, “Proposed changes to collective bargaining agreement polling summary”, http://www.ourschoolscoalition.org/documents/Our_Schools_polling_summary.pdf

42.

Our Voice Washington Education Association, 2013, “Coalition files charter school lawsuit on seven key problems”, 3 July, http://ourvoicewashingtonea.org/page/2/

43.

Patterson

J T

(2001) Brown v. Board of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone and its Troubled Legacy, New York: Oxford University Press

44.

Peck

Tickell

(2002) “Neoliberalizing space”. Antipode 34: 380–404

45.

Peck

Theordore

Brenner

(2009) “Postneoliberalism and its malcontents”. Antipode 41(S1): 94–116

46.

Pedroni

T C

(2006) “Acting neoliberal: is Black support for vouchers a rejection of progressive educational values?”. Educational Studies: A Journal of the American Educational Studies Association 40: 265–278

47.

Pedroni

T C

(2007) Market Movements: African American Involvement in School Voucher Reform, New York: Routledge

48.

Pedroni

T C

(2011) “Urban shrinkage as a performance of whiteness: neoliberal urban restructuring, education, and racial containment in the post-industrial, global niche city”. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 32: 203–216

49.

Perrucci

Wysong

(2006) “Educating for privilege”. In: Lauder

Brown

Dillabough

J A

Halsey

A H

(eds) Education, Globalization and Social Change, New York: Oxford United Press, pp. 965–979

50.

Purcell

(2011) “Discourses of aspiration, opportunity and attainment: promoting and contesting the Academy schools programme”. Children's Geographies 9(1): 49–61

51.

Rapp D, 1989, “Reagan added luster but little clout to office” Congressional Weekly 7 January, pp 3–10

52.

Ravitch

(2010) The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice are Undermining Education, New York: Basic Books

53.

Residents for a Better Bridgeport, 2013, “Vote for our kids. Vote Yes on 1”, http://www.residentsforabetterbridgeport.com/mail/mail1.pdf

54.

Rethinking Schools 2010, “Editorial. Building hope”, Spring, http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/24_03/24_03_editorial.shtml

55.

Richards E, 2010, “State will submit bid for school funds early” Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel 15 January, http://www.jsonline.com/news/education/81769797.html

56.

Rose

(1996) “The death of the social? Refiguring the territory of government”. Economy and Society 25: 327–356

57.

Rose

(1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

58.

Rotherham A, 2010, “Fenty's loss in D.C.: a blow to education reform?” TIME Magazine http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2019395,00.html

59.

Saltman

(2011) “From Carnegie to Gates: the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the venture philanthropy agenda for public education”. In: Kovacs

(eds) The Gates Foundation and the Future of U.S “Public” Schools, New York: Routledge, pp. 1–20

60.

Save Our Schools, 2013, “The people's education principles”, http://saveourschoolsmarch.com/SOSMrch2013Flyrs/SOSMrch2013EnglshFlyr.pdf

61.

Scott

(2009) “The politics of venture philanthropy in charter school policy and advocacy”. Educational Policy 23(1): 106–136

62.

Scott

(2011) “Rosa Parks moment? School choice and the marketization of civil rights”. Critical Studies in Education 54: 5–18

63.

Scott

J T

(2013) “A Rosa Parks moment? School choice and the marketization of civil rights”. Critical Studies in Education 54: 5–18

64.

Shaw L, 2011, “Charter schools narrowly win approval in Washington” The Seattle Times 12 November Shaw L, 2012, “Washington's high school graduation rates below average” The Seattle Times 26 November, http://blogs.seattletimes.com/today/2012/11/washingtons-high-school-graduation-rates-below-average

65.

Shen

F X

(2012) “Community support for mayoral control of urban school districts: a critical reexamination”. Education and Urban Society 44: 342–367

66.

Taylor

(2001) “The geography of choice and diversity in the ‘new’ secondary education market of England”. Area 33: 368–381

67.

Tepfer D, Lambeck L C, 2012, “Supreme Court voids takeover of schools” Connecticut Post 28 February, http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Supreme-Court-voids-takeover-of-schools-3367832.php

68.

The Columbian Editorial Board, 2013, “In our view: WEA targets Initiative 1240” The Clark County Columbian 4 March

69.

The Everett Herald Editorial Board, 2012, “Everett Herald says YES on 1240: public charter schools are a key ingredient in education reform” The Everett Herald 9 October, http://www.wacharters.org/category/news/opinion/page/4/

70.

The Olympian Editorial Board, 2012, “The Olympian endorses YES on 1240—public charter schools essential to goal of innovating K-12. The Olympian 24 September

71.

The Seattle Times Editorial Board, 2012, “The Seattle Times endorses YES on 1240—allowing option of public charter schools moves us forward” The Seattle Times 13 October

72.

Underwood J, 2013, “School boards beware: influential national network calls for elimination of school boards” Wisconsin School News May, pp 18–19,

73.

Waiting for Superman 2010, Dir. D Guggenheim (Walden Media, Participant Media) Washington Secretary of State, 2012, “General election results”, 6 November, http://vote.wa.gov/results/20121106/Initiative-Measure-No-1240-Concerns-creation-of-a-public-charterschool-system.html

74.

Washington State Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction, 2013, “Summary of McCleary vs. Washington”, http://www.k12.wa.us/Communications/OtherCommunications/SummaryMcLearyDecision2013.pdf

75.

Washington State Public Disclosure Commission, no date, http://www.pdc.wa.gov/MvcQuerySystem/Committee/initiative_committees?

76.

Washington Student Achievement Council, 2012 Critical Crossroads: A Call to Action. The 2012 Strategic Action Plan for Educational Attainment, http://www.wsac.wa.gov/sites/default/files/Critical_Crossroads-Revised4-13.pdf

77.

Wilkins

(2010) “Citizens and/or consumers: mutations in the construction of concepts and practices of school choice”. Journal of Education Policy 25: 171–189

Teaching the market: fostering consent to education markets in the United States

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References