BACKGROUND: Although diagnostically homogeneous group therapy is a generally accepted component of the outpatient treatment of persons with bipolar disorder, investigations into the use of this modality in the inpatient setting are preliminary.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Self-Management Group Model with that of the Interactional Group Model in improving the ability of patients hospitalized with bipolar disorder to care for themselves when discharged.
DESIGN: This study used a quasi-experimental, nonequivalent comparison group design with repeated measures that were administered before the intervention, after the intervention, and 3 months after discharge from the hospital. Instruments elicited data on self-reported mood states, behavior and symptom identification, coping resources, and satisfaction with the group services.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two people participated at the first measurement period. No significant total score differences were found between the two groups on any of the four measurements. However, 3 months after hospitalization, Interactional Group Model participants reported significantly less difficulty with behaviors and symptoms at the 3-month measurement period when compared with their admission scores but less satisfaction with the groups than they had at discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that each method has advantages; the optimal model may be one that combines elements of both methods within a self-management focus.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Bauer, M. S., McBride, L., Chase, C., Sachs, G., & Shea, N. (1998). Manual-based group psychotherapy for bipolar disorder: A feasibility study. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59, 449-455.
3.
Boyle, G. J. (1985). Self-report measures of depression: Some psychometric considerations. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 45-59.
4.
Cerbone, M. J. A., Mayo, J. A., Cuthbertson, B. A., & O’Connell, R. A. (1992). Group therapy as an adjunct to medication in the management of bipolar affective disorder. Group, 16, 174-187.
5.
Cohn, R. C. (1969). The Theme-Centered Interactional Method: Group therapists as group educators. Journal of Group Psychoanalysis and Process, 2, 19-36.
6.
Corcoran, K., & Fischer, J. (1987). Measures for clinical practice. New York: Free Press.
7.
Eisen, S. V., Dill, D. L., & Grob, M. C. (1994). Reliability and validity of a brief patient-report instrument for psychiatric outcome evaluation. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 45, 242-247.
8.
Eisen, S. V., & Youngman, D. (1994). Instruction manual for BASIS- 32. Belmont, MA: McLean Hospital.
9.
Hammer, A. L. (1988). Manual for the Coping Resources Inventory research edition. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
10.
Hayes, R. C. (1976). Developing a group program for the treatment of outpatients on lithium carbonate. Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 27, 391-392.
11.
Hlastala, S. A., Frank, E., Mallinger, A. G., Thase, M. E., Ritenour, A. M., & Kupfer, D. J. (1997). Bipolar depression: An underestimated treatment challenge. Depression and Anxiety, 5, 73-83.
12.
Jacobs, K. W., & Boze, M. M. (1993). Correlations among scales of the Beck Depression Inventory and the Profile of Mood States. Psychological Reports, 73, 431-434.
13.
Kanas, N. (1993). Group psychotherapy with bipolar patients: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 43, 321-333.
14.
Larsen, D. L., Attkisson, C. C., Hargreaves, W.A., & Nguyen, T. D. (1979). Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scale. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2, 197-207.
15.
McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., & Droppleman, L. F. (1992). EdITS Manual for the Profile of Mood States (rev. ed.). San Diego: EdITS/Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
16.
Miller, D. C. (1991). Handbook of research design and social measurement (5th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Parikh, S. V., Kusumakar, V., Haslam, D. R. S., Matte, R., Sharma, V., & Yatham, L. N. (1997). Psychosocial interventions as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy in bipolar disorder. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 42(Suppl. 2), 74S-78S.
18.
Pollack, L. E. (1990). Improving relationships: Groups for inpatients with bipolar disorder. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 28(5), 17-22.
19.
Pollack, L. E. (1993). Content analysis of groups for inpatients with bipolar disorder. Applied Nursing Research, 6, 19-27.
20.
Pollack, L. E. (1995). Treatment of inpatients with bipolar disorders: A role for self-management groups. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 33(1), 11-16.
21.
Stone, W. N. (1998). Affect and therapeutic process in groups for chronically mentally ill persons. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 7, 208-216.
22.
van Gent, E. M., Vida, S. L., & Zwart, F. M. (1988). Group therapy in addition to lithium therapy in patients with bipolar disorders. Acta Psychiatric Belgica, 88, 405-418.
23.
Yalom, I. D. (1983). Inpatient group psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
