Analysis of 114 text messages from websites and eight visual stimuli dealing with menopause reveals that in general most of the messages do only modestly well in interesting consumers. From a study of 552 female respondents on the Internet, using conjoint analysis and current in-market messages, the results suggest that rather than dividing consumers by age, self-reported menopausal state, or major symptom suffered, the marketer should divide the consumer by mind-set. Four mind-sets emerged from this study: Segment 1 — interested but not responsive to communication; Segment 2 — matter of fact; Segment 3 — better living through chemistry; Segment 4 — eternal youth through replacement therapy. Through segmentation it becomes very easy to create far more powerful and impactful communications.
StantonW.W.StantonA.D. (2002) ‘Personality Characteristics of Adopters of Innovative Healthcare Products’, with Angela D'Auria Stanton. Unpublished paper.
2.
JudkinsD.Z. (2000) ‘Women's health on the Web: An overview’, in WoodM.S.CogganJ.M. (eds) Women's Health on the Internet.The Haworth Press, Inc., New York.
3.
FoxS.RainieL.HorariganJ.LenhartA.SpoonerT.BurkeM.. (2000) The online health care revolution: How the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Accessed 28 October, 2002, from: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=26.
4.
BowerH. (1996) ‘Internet sees growth of unverified health claims’, British Medical Journal, 313, 381.
5.
CookeA. (1999) ‘Quality of Health and Medical Information on the Internet’, Clinical Performance and Quality Health Care, 7, 178–182.
6.
American Accreditation Health Care Commission (2002a) Executive summary: Survey of consumers' attitudes towards health web sites and accreditation. Accessed 28 October from: http://www.urac.org/docs/websiteaccreditation/Summary.pdf.
WoodM.S.CogganJ.M. (2000) Women's Health on the Internet.The Haworth Press, Inc., New York.
9.
ShedivyJ.M. (2001) ‘A guide to women's health on the web’, Reference Services Review, 29, 40–52.
10.
American Accreditation Health Care Commission (2002a) op. cit..
11.
JiangP. (2000) Segment-based mass customisation: An exploration of a new conceptual marketing framework. Internet Research: Networking Applications and Policy, 10, 215–226.
12.
GreenP.E.SrinivasanV. (1978) ‘A general approach to product design optimisation via conjoint analysis’, Journal of Marketing, 45, 17–37.
13.
HuntJ.D.AbrahamJ.E.PattersonD.M. (1995) ‘Computer generated conjoint analysis surveys for investigating citizens preferences’, in WyattR.HemayetH. (ed.) Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, Melbourne, 11–14 July, 13–25.
14.
WittinkD.R.CattinP. (1989) ‘Commercial use of conjoint analysis: An update’, Journal of Marketing, 53, 91–96.
15.
MoskowitzH.R.MarketoC. (2001) ‘Selecting products for category appraisal studies. Fewer products do almost as well as many products’, Journal of Sensory Studies, 16, 537–549.
16.
MoskowitzH.R.IttyB.ShandA.KriegerB. (2002) Understanding the consumer mind through a concept category appraisal: Toothpaste. Canadian Journal of Market Research, 20, 3–15.
17.
MoskowitzH.R.MarketoC.RabinoS. (2002) ‘Advertising energy: Corporate communications, public policy issues, and the customer mind’, submitted to International Journal of Online Research..
18.
MoskowitzH.R.IttyB. (2002) ‘Functional foods: Using information on the web and web interviewing to jump-start development’, Paper delivered at the institute of food technologists, annual meeting, Intermountain Division, February.
19.
MoskowitzH.R.IttyB.ShandA.KatzR. (2002) ‘The mind of the customer: Hot buttons and turn-offs regarding new methods of processing/preservation’, Paper delivered at the Institute of Food Technologists Eastern Regional Meeting, March.
20.
GreenP.E.KriegerA.M. (1991) ‘Segmenting markets with conjoint analysis’, Journal of Marketing, 55, 20–31.
21.
TscheulinD.K.HelmigB. (1998) ‘The optimal design of hospital advertising by means of conjoint measurement’, Journal of Advertising Research, 38, 35–46.
22.
MoskowitzH.R.MartinD.G. (1993) ‘How computer aided design and presentation of concepts speeds up the product development process’, in Proceedings of the 46th ESOMAR Conference, Copenhagen, 405–424.
23.
MoskowitzH.R. (1996) Segmenting consumers world-wide: An application of multiple media conjoint methods. Proceedings of the 49th ESOMAR Congress, Istanbul, 535–552.
24.
BeckleyJ.MoskowitzH.R. (2002) ‘Databasing the consumer mind: The crave it!, healthy you!, buy it! and drink it! databases’, Paper delivered at the Institute of Food Technologists Conference, Anaheim, CA.
25.
Systat (1997) Systat. The System for Statistics, Evanston, IL.
26.
MoskowitzH.R.MartinD.G. (1993) op. cit..
27.
MoskowitzH.R. (1996) op. cit..
28.
American Accreditation Health Care Commission (2002a) op. cit..
