A new haptics design for visualizing data is constructed out of commodity massage pads and custom controllers and interfaces to a computer. It is an output device for information that can be transmitted to a user who sits on the pad. Two unique properties of the design are: (a) its large feedback area and (b) its passive nature, where unlike most current haptics devices, the user's hands are free to work on other things. To test how useful such a device is for visualizing data, we added the VisPad interface to our protein structure-alignment program (ProtAlign) and performed usability studies. The studies demonstrated that information could be perceived significantly faster utilizing our multi-modal presentation compared to vision-based graphical visualization alone.
HansenMCharpELodhaSWeissgerber-MeadsDPangA.PROMUSE: A prototype system for multi-media visualization of protein structural alignments. In: AltmanRDunkerAHunterLKleinTLauderdaleK (Eds). Pacific Symposium on BioComputing. World Scientific Publishing: London, 1999; 367–379.
2.
van VeenHvan ErpJ.Tactile information presentation in the cockpit. Haptic Human–Computer Interaction 2000 (Glasgow, UK) Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, 2000; 174–181.
3.
BurdeaG.Haptics issues in virtual environments. Computer Graphics International 2000 (Geneva, Switzerland), IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos, CA, 2000; 295–302.
4.
HaywardVCruz-HernandezJ.Tactile display device using distributed lateral skin stretch. In: Proceedings of the Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems Symposium (Orlando, Florida), ASME IMECE2000, 2000; DSC-69–2: 1309–1314.
5.
OgiTHiroseM.Multisensory data sensualization based on human perception. IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium 1996 (Santa Clara, U.S.A.), IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos, CA, 1996; 66–70.
6.
Weissgerber-MeadsDHansenMPangA.ProtAlign: A 3-dimensional protein alignment assessment tool. In: AltmanRDunkerAHunterLKleinTLauderdaleK (Eds). Pacific Symposium on BioComputing. World Scientific Publishing: London, 1999; 354–367.
7.
LedermanSMartinATongCKlatzkyR.Relative performance using haptic and/or touch produced auditory cues in a remote absolute texture identification task. 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems 2003 (Los Angeles, U.S.A.) IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos, CA, 2003; 151–158.
8.
FritzJ.Haptic representation of scientific data for visually impaired or blind persons. Ph.D. thesis, University of Delaware, 1996.
9.
SekulerRBlakeR.Perception, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1994; 572pp.
10.
EdwardsG.Performance and Usability of Force Feedback and Auditory Substitutions in a Virtual Environment Manipulation Task. Master's thesis, 2000; Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
11.
TurkMRobertsonG.Perceptual user interfaces (introduction). Communications of the ACM2000; 3: 32–34.
12.
PentlandA.Perceptual user interfaces: Perceptual intelligence. Communications of the ACM2000; 3: 35–44.
TANH.Perceptual user interfaces: Haptic interfaces. Communications of the ACM2000; 3: 40–41.
15.
TanHSlivovskyLPentlandA.A sensing chair using pressure distribution sensors. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics2001; 3: 261–268.
16.
TanHPentlandA.Tactual displays for wearable computing. Personal Technologies2001; 1: 225–230.
17.
LindemanRCutlerJ.Controller design for a wearable, near-field haptic display. 11th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems 2003 (Los Angeles, U.S.A.) IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos, CA, 2003; 397–403.
18.
LindemanRYanagidaY.Empirical studies for effective near-field haptics in virtual environments. IEEE Virtual Reality 2003 (Los Angeles, U.S.A.), IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos, CA, 2003; 287–288.
19.
LindemanRYanagidaYSibertJLavineR.Effective vibrotactile cueing in a visual search task. Ninth IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction (Zurich, Switzerland), to appear in INTERACT 2003, 2003.
20.
KirkpatrickADouglasS.Application based evaluation of haptic interfaces. 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems 2002 (Orlando, U.S.A.), IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos, CA, 2002; 32–39.
21.
NCEDC, Northern California earthquake data center [WWW document] http://quake.geo.berkeley.edu (accessed 1 August 2001).
HausslerD.UCSC genome bioinformatics [WWW document] http://genome.ucsc.edu/ (accessed 10 April 2003).
24.
HansenMWeissgerber-MeadsDPangA.Comparative visualization of protein structure-sequence alignments. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 1998 (Research Triangle Park, USA), IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos, CA, 1998; 106–110.
HenikoffSHenikoffJ.Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences1992; 89: 10915–10919.
27.
BowieJLuthyREisenbergD.A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a know three–dimensional structure. Science1991; 253: 164–170.
28.
HueyBWickensC.Workload factor. In: HueyBWickensC (Eds). Workload Transition: Implications for Individual and Team Performance. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 1993; 54–93.
29.
BridgemanBMayerM.Failure to integrate visual information from successive fixations. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society1983; 21: 285–286.
30.
TurattoMBensoFGalfanoGUmiltaC.Nonspatial attentional shifts between audition and vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance2002; 28: 628–639.
31.
TurattoMGalfanoGBridgemanBUmiltaC.Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems. Visual Cognition2003, in press.
