TexTonic is a visual analytic system for interactive exploration of very large unstructured text collections. TexTonic visualizes hierarchical clusters of representative terms, snippets, and documents in a single, multi-scale spatial layout. Exploration is supported by interacting with the visualization and directly manipulating the terms in the visualization using semantic interactions. These semantic interactions steer the underlying analytic model by translating user interactions within the visualization to contextual updates to the supporting data model. The combination of semantic interactions and information visualization at multiple levels of the data hierarchy helps users manage information overload so that they can more effectively explore very large text collections. In this article, we describe TexTonic’s data processing and analytic pipeline, user interface and interaction design principles, and results of a user study conducted mid-development with experienced data analysts. We also discuss the implications TexTonic could have on visual exploration and discovery tasks.
ThomasJJCookKA (eds). Illuminating the path: the research and development agenda for visual analytics. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2005.
2.
EndertAFiauxPNorthC.Semantic interaction for visual text analytics. In: Proceedings of the 2012 SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Austin, TX, 5–10 May 2012, pp. 473–482. New York: ACM.
RischJSRexDBDowsonST, et al. The STARLIGHT information visualization system. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on information visualization, London, 27–29 August 1997, pp. 42–49. New York: IEEE.
5.
AlsakranJChenYZhaoY, et al. STREAMIT: dynamic visualization and interactive exploration of text streams. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Pacific visualization symposium, Hong Kong, China, 1–4 March 2011, pp. 131–138. New York: IEEE.
6.
FelixCPandeyAVBertiniE.TextTile: an interactive visualization tool for seamless exploratory analysis of structured data and unstructured text. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr2017; 23(1): 161–170.
7.
KimMKangKParkD, et al. TopicLens: efficient multi-level visual topic exploration of large-scale document collections. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr2017; 23(1): 151–160.
8.
GansnerERHuYKobourovS.GMap: visualizing graphs and clusters as maps. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Pacific visualization symposium, Taipei, Taiwan, 2–5 March 2010, pp. 201–208. New York: IEEE.
9.
DavidsonGSHendricksonBJohnsonDK, et al. Knowledge mining with VxInsight: discovery through interaction. J Intell Inf Syst1998; 11: 259–285.
10.
OlsenKAKorfhageRRSochatsKM, et al. Visualization of a document collection: the vibe system. Inform Process Manag1993; 29(1): 69–81.
KaserOLemireD.Tag-cloud drawing: algorithms for cloud visualization. In: Proceedings of the WWW2007 workshop on tagging metadata for social information organization, Banff, AB, Canada, 8–12 May 2007.
13.
SeifertCKumpBKienreichW, et al. On the beauty and usability of tag clouds. In: Proceedings of the 2008 12th international conference on information visualisation, London, 9–11 July 2008, pp. 17–25. New York: IEEE.
14.
CuiWWuYLiuS, et al. Context preserving dynamic word cloud visualization. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Pacific visualization symposium, Taipei, Taiwan, 2–5 March 2010, pp. 121–128. New York: IEEE.
15.
WangJ.Clustered layout word cloud for user generated online reviews. Master’s Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 2012.
16.
PaulovichFVToledoFMBTellesGP, et al. Semantic wordification of document collections. Comput Graph Forum2012; 31(3): 1145–1153.
17.
HollowayTBozicevicMBrnerK.Analyzing and visualizing the semantic coverage of Wikipedia and its authors. Complexity2007; 12(3): 30–40.
18.
PangCIBiuk-AghaiRP.Wikipedia world map: method and application of map-like wiki visualization. In: Proceedings of the 2011 7th international symposium on wikis and open collaboration, Mountain View, CA, 3–5 October 2011, pp. 124–133. New York: ACM.
19.
ThomasJJCowleyPJKucharO, et al. Discovering knowledge through visual analysis. J Univers Comput Sci2001; 7(6): 517–529.
20.
EndertABurtnerRCramerN, et al. Typograph: multiscale spatial exploration of text documents. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE international conference on big data, Silicon Valley, CA, 6–9 October 2013, pp. 17–24. New York: IEEE.
21.
EndertABradelLNorthC.Beyond control panels: direct manipulation for visual analytics. IEEE Comput Graph2013; 33: 6–13.
22.
BohnSJCalapristiAJBrownSD, et al. Analytic steering: inserting context into the information dialog. In: Proceedings of the IEEE workshop on interactive visual text analytics for decision making, Providence, RI, 24 October 2011.
23.
EndertAHanCMaitiD, et al. Observation-level interaction with statistical models for visual analytics. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE conference on visual analytics science and technology, Providence, RI, 23–28 October 2011, pp. 121–130. New York: IEEE.
24.
HuXBradelLMaitiD, et al. Semantics of directly manipulating spatializations. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr2013; 19(12): 2052–2059.
25.
GłowackaDRuotsaloTKonyushkovaK, et al. Directing exploratory search: reinforcement learning from user interactions with keywords. In: Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on intelligent user interfaces, Santa Monica, CA, 19–22 March 2013, pp. 117–127. New York: ACM.
26.
ArnoldKCGajosKZ.Effective interactions for personalizing spatial visualizations of collections. In: Adjunct proceedings of the 28th annual ACM symposium on user interface software & technology, Daegu, Republic of Korea, 8–11 November 2015, pp. 77–78. New York: ACM.
27.
BradelLNorthCHouseL, et al. Multi-model semantic interaction for text analytics. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE conference on visual analytics science and technology (VAST), Paris, 25–31 October 2014, pp. 163–172. New York: IEEE.
28.
RoseSEngelDCramerN, et al. Automatic keyword extraction from individual documents. In: BerryMWKoganJ (eds) Text mining: applications and theory. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2010, pp. 1–20.
TippingMEBishopCM.Probabilistic principal component analysis. J Roy Stat Soc B1999; 61(3): 611–622.
31.
BeenKDaichesEYapC.Dynamic map labeling. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr2006; 12(5): 773–780.
32.
LewisCH.Using the “thinking aloud” method in cognitive interface design. Technical report no. RC-9265, 17February1982. Yorktown Heights, NY: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center.
33.
BrookeJ.SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. In: JordanPWThomasBWeerdmeesterBA, et al. (eds) Usability evaluation in industry, Chapter 21. London: Taylor & Francis, 1996, pp. 189–194.
34.
HartSGStavelandLE.Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv Psychol1988; 52: 139–183.
35.
PaulCLCookKBurtnerR.The economics of contribution in a large enterprise-scale wiki. In: Proceedings of the companion publication of the 17th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing, Baltimore, MD, 15–19 February 2014, pp. 205–208. New York: ACM.
36.
SchonePGoldschenALangleyC, et al. TCAR at TAC-KBP 2009. In: Proceedings of the NIST TAC 2009, Gaithersburg, MD, 16–17 November 2009.
37.
DeerwesterSDumaisSLandauerT, et al. Improving information retrieval with latent semantic indexing. In: Proceedings of the 51st annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science (Vol. 25). Atlanta, Georgia: Learned Information, Inc., 1988, pp. 36–40.
HoqueECareniniG.MultiConVis: a visual text analytics system for exploring a collection of online conversations. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on intelligent user interfaces, Sonoma, CA, 7–10 March 2016, pp. 96–107. New York: ACM.
