In persuasion theory and research, the issue of how to resist persuasion has also been evaluated. The classic research on this topic is inoculation, which describes the process of introducing the opposition's persuasive arguments and providing counter-arguments to these attacks, thus further strengthening defences so that there is resistance to subsequent persuasion attempts by the opposition. Qualitative war-gaming methodology is used in a number of situations to develop persuasive messages and resistance against persuasion attempts by the opposition. Applications of findings from persuasion resistance research to the war-gaming methodology are explored.
SagarinB. J.SernaS. B.CialdiniR. B.RiceW. E.(2002) Dispelling the illusion of invulnerability: The motivations and mechanisms of resistance to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83(3): 526–541.
2.
McGuireWilliam J. (1999) Constructing Social Psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, p. 52.
3.
PerloffRichard M. (2003) The Dynamics of Persuasion: Communication and Attitudes in the 21st Century. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4.
FoxS. Online health search 2006. Pew Internet & American Life Project, www.pewinternet.org.
5.
PfauM.SzaboE. A.AndersonJ.MorrillJ.ZubricJ.WanH. (2001) The role and impact of affect in the process of resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research27(2): 216–252.
6.
LessneG. J.DidowN. M.Jr. (1987) Inoculation theory and resistance to persuasion in marketing. Psychology and Marketing4(Summer): 157–165.
7.
TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2002) What doesn't kill me makes me stronger: The effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83(6): 1298–1313.
8.
RydellR. J.HugenbergK.McConnellA. R. (2006) Resistance can be good or bad: How theories of resistance and dissonance affect attitude certainty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin32(6): 740–750.
9.
CrowleyA. E.HoyerW. D. (1994) An integrative framework for understanding two-sided persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research20(March): 561–574.
10.
BizerG. Y.PettyR. E. (2005) How we conceptualize our attitudes matters: The effect of valence framing on the resistance of political attitudes. Political Psychology26(4): 553–568.
11.
PfauM. (2006) The conundrum of the timing of counterarguing effects in resistance: Strategies to boost the performance of counterarguing output. Communication Quarterly54(2): 143–156.
