Burton-JonesA., and LeeA.S. (2011). The Hermeneutics of Measurement: Principles and implications for quantitative and qualitative research, Working Paper, Sauder School of Business, UBC.
2.
CampbellD.T., and FiskeD.W. (1959). Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix, Psychological Bulletin56(2): 81–105.
3.
DavisonR.M., and MartinsonsM.G. (2011). Methodological Practice and Policy for Organisationally and Socially Relevant IS Research: An inclusive- exclusive perspective, Journal of Information Technology26(4): 288–293.
4.
GregorS. (2006). The Nature of Theory in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly30(3): 611–642.
5.
LeeA.S., and DennisA.R. (forthcoming). A Hermeneutic Interpretation of a Controlled Laboratory Experiment: A case study of decision making with a group support system, Information Systems Journal.
6.
NanN. (2011). Capturing Bottom-Up Information Technology Use Processes: A complex adaptive systems model, MIS Quarterly35(2): 505–532.
7.
OrlikowskiW.J. (1996). Improvising Organizational Transformation over Time: A situated change perspective, Information Systems Research7(1): 63–92.
8.
SharmaR., YettonP.W., and CrawfordJ. (2009). Estimating the Effect of Common Method Variance: The method-method pair technique with an illustration from TAM research, MIS Quarterly33(3): 473–490.
9.
StraubD. (2009). Why Top Journals Accept Your Paper, MIS Quarterly33(3): iii–x.
10.
StraubD.W., and AngS. (2008). Editor's Comments: Readability and the relevance versus rigor debate, MIS Quarterly32(4): iii–xiv.
11.
VenkateshV., BrownS.A., and BalaH. (forthcoming). Bridging the Qualitative-quantitative Divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems, MIS Quarterly.
12.
WeberR. (2004). Editor's Comments: The rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: A personal view, MIS Quarterly28(1): iii–xii.
13.
WhettenD.A. (1989). What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution?Academy of Management Review14(4): 490–495.
