This essay interrogates the assemblage of female sexuality. Drawing on an analysis of Masters and Johnson's anatomical research and primatological research on monkeys, I argue that the female sexuality was the product of encounters between women, machines and monkeys. Orgasm's extra-species life produced a conception of female sexuality as natural in evolutionary and anatomical terms. The set of assumptions that follow this naturalisation of female sexuality through an emphasis on orgasm allow us to further deconstruct notions of female sexuality, naturalness and the politics of knowledge that produce this assemblage. Ultimately, I argue that this focus on anatomy and female orgasm allows us to see the stakes of an anatomically based sexual difference.
BurtonF. (1970) ‘Sexual climax in the female Macaca mulatto‘ Proceedings of the Third International Congress of Primatology, Zurich: S. Karger, Vol. 3: 180–191.
2.
Chevalier-SkolnikoffS. (1974) ‘Male-female, female-female, and male-male sexual behavior in the stumptail monkey with special attention to the female orgasm’Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 3, No. 2: 95–116.
3.
FediganL.M. (1994) ‘Science and the successful female: why there are so many women primatologists’American Anthropologist, Vol. 96, No. 3: 529–540.
4.
FindlayH. (1992) ‘Freud's “fetishism” and the lesbian dildo debates’Feminist Studies, Vol. 18, No. 3: 563–579.
5.
GalisonP. (1998) ‘Judgment against objectivity’ in GalisonP., and JonesC. (1998) editors, Picturing Science: Producing Art, London and New York: Routledge, 327–359.
6.
GerhardJ. (2001) Desiring Revolution: Second Ware Feminism and the Rewriting of American Sexual Thought, 1920 to 1982, New York: Columbia University Press.
7.
HarawayD. (1990a) Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science, New York: Routledge.
8.
HarawayD. (1990b) ‘Investment strategies for the evolving portfolio of primate females’ in JacobsM., KellerE.F., and ShuttleworthS. (1990) editors, Body/politics, London and New York: Routledge, 139–162.
9.
IrvineJ. (1991) Disorders of Desire: Sex and Gender in Modern American Sexology, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
10.
JohnsonE. (1999) ‘The “coloscopic” film and the “beaver” film: scientific and pornographic scenes of female sexual responsiveness’ in RadnerH., and LuckettM. (1999) editors, Swinging Single: Representing Sexuality in the 1960s, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 301–326.
11.
Jordan-youngR. (2010) Brainstorm: The Flaws in the Science of Sexual Difference, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
12.
KoedtA. (2002) ‘Myth of the vaginal orgasm’Notes from the First Year, in BloomA., and BreinesW. (2002) editors, ‘Takin’ It to the Streets’: A Sixties Reader, 2nd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 422–428.
13.
LamosC. (1994) ‘The postmodern lesbian position: on our backs’ in DoanL. (1994) editor, The Lesbian Postmodern, New York: Columbia University Press, 85–103.
14.
LloydE.A. (2005) The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
15.
MaierT. (2009) Masters of Sex: The Life and Times of William Masters and Virginia Johnson, the Couple Mho Taught America How to Love, New York: Basic Books.
16.
MainesR. (1999) Technology of Orgasm: Hysteria, the Vibrator, and Women's Sexual Satisfaction, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17.
MastersW., and JohnsonV. (1966) Human Sexual Response, Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
18.
MastersW., and JohnsonV. (1970) Human Sexual Inadequacy, New York and Toronto: Bantam Books.
19.
NewtonE. (1984) ‘The mythic mannish lesbian: Radclyffe Hall and the new woman’Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 9, No. 4: 557–575.
20.
RobinsonP. (1989) The Modernization of Sex: Havelock Ellis, Alfred Kinsey, William Master and Virginia Johnson, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21.
SchiebingerL. (1999) Has Feminism Changed Science?Cambridge; London: Harvard University Press.
22.
SherfeyM.J. (1966) ‘The evolution and nature of female sexuality in relation to psychoanalytic theory’Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 16, No. 3: 28–125.
23.
Smith-RosenbergC. (1985) (reprint 1989) ‘Discourses of sexuality and subjectivity: the new woman, 1870–1936’ in DubermanM., VicinusM., and ChaunceyG. (1985) editors, Hidden from History: Reclaiming the Gay and Lesbian Past, New York: Penguin, 264–280.
24.
TerryJ. (1999) An American Obsession: Science, Medicine and Homosexuality in Modern Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
TieferL. (1995) Sex Is Not a Natural Act and Other Essays, Boulder, CO: Westview.
26.
von Krafft-EbingR. (1922) Psychopathia Sexualis, with Especial Reference to the Antipathic Sexual Instinct: A Medico-Forensic Study, Translated by Rebman, F.J., New York: Medical Art Agency.
27.
WeigmanR. (2012) Object Lessons, Chapel Hill: Duke University Press.
28.
WilliamsL. (1999) Hardcore: Power, Pleasure, and ‘The Frenzy of the Visible’, Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
WilsonE. (1983) ‘The context of between pleasure and danger’Feminist Review, Issue 13: 35–41.
30.
WittigM. (1992) ‘The straight mind’ in The Straight Mind and Other Essays, Boston: Beacon Press.
