This article integrates two topics usually considered disciplines apart, namely, creativity and free will. In particular, creative thoughts are conceived as acts of free will. This integration begins by reviewing recent advances in a specific two-stage theory of creative problem solving, namely blind variation and selective retention (BVSR). After discussing the parallel two-stage theory of free will (chance then choice), both two-stage theories are then integrated into a single formal representation entailing choice initial probabilities, final utilities, and prior knowledge values. These three parameters are used to define the creativity of any given solution and the “sightedness” of any generated thought or choice. Both creativity and free will vanish as sightedness increases, but their relation to blindness is more complex, yielding a triangular joint distribution that mandates a second-stage selection or decision process. In addition, to accommodate the need to create choices actively rather than just decide among given choices, the treatment expands to encompass both thoughts and choices as combinatorial products. This extension connects the discussion of free will with both combinatorial models of creativity and the research on the factors that enable a person to engage in free combinatorial processes. The article closes with suggestions of future empirical and theoretical research with respect to psychology, philosophy, and potential future exchanges between the two disciplines.
AcarS., & RuncoM. A. (2012). Psychoticism and creativity: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 341–350. doi:10.1037/a0027497
2.
AmabileT. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.
3.
BaerJ., KaufmanJ. C., & BaumeisterR. F. (). (2008). Are we free? Psychology and free will. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189636.001.0001
4.
BainA. (1977). The senses and the intellect. Washington, DC: University Publications of America. (Original work published 1855).
5.
BaumeisterR. F. (2008). Free will, consciousness, and cultural animals. In BaerJ., KaufmanJ. C., & BaumeisterR. F. (), Are we free? Psychology and free will (pp. 65–85). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189636.003.0005
6.
BodenM. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths & mechanisms (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
BowersK. S., RegehrG., BalthazardC., & ParkerK. (1990). Intuition in the context of discovery. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 72–110. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(90)90004-N
8.
CampbellD. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400. doi:10.1037/h0040373
9.
CampbellD. T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology. In SchlippP. A. (), The philosophy of Karl Popper (pp. 413–463). La Salle, IL: Open Court.
10.
CarsonS. H., PetersonJ. B., & HigginsD. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 499–506. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.499
11.
CarsonS. H., PetersonJ. B., & HigginsD. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37–50. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4
12.
CzikoG. A. (1998). From blind to creative: In defense of Donald Campbell's selectionist theory of human creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 192–209. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1998.tb00815.x
13.
DamianR. I., & SimontonD. K. (2011). From past to future art: The creative impact of Picasso's 1935 Minotauromachy on his 1937 Guernica. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 360–369. doi:10.1037/a0023017
14.
DennettD. C. (1978). Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Hassocks, UK: Harvester Press.
15.
DennettD. C. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
16.
DoyleR. O. (2009, June 25). Free will: It's a normal biological property, not a gift or a mystery. Nature, 459, 1052. doi:10.1038/4591052c
17.
DoyleB. (2010). Jamesian free will, the two-stage model of William James. William James Studies, 5, 1–28. Retrieved December 31, 2010, fromhttp://williamjamesstudies.org/5.1/doyle.pdf
EysenckH. J. (1994). Creativity and personality: Word association, origence, and Psychoticism. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 209–216. doi:10.1080/10400419409534525
20.
EysenckM. W. (2004). Psychology: An international perspective. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
21.
GoughH. G. (1976). Studying creativity by means of word association tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 348–353. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.61.3.348
22.
GuilfordJ. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
23.
HadamardJ. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
HarrisJ. A. (2004). Measured intelligence, achievement, openness to experience, and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 913–929. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00161-2
25.
HaskerW. (2011). Divine knowledge and human freedom. In KaneR. (), The Oxford handbook of free will (2nd ed., pp. 39–54). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399691.003.0002
26.
HélieS., & RonS. (2010). Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: A unified theory and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 117, 994–1024. doi:10.1037/a0019532
27.
JamesW. (1880, October). Great men, great thoughts, and the environment. Atlantic Monthly, 46, 441–459.
28.
JamesW. (1884). The dilemma of determinism. Unitarian Review and Religious Magazine, 22, 193–224.
29.
JamesW. (1952). The principles of psychology. In HutchinsR. M. (), Great books of the Western world (Vol. 53). Chicago, IL: Encyclopaedia Britannica. (Original work published 1892).
30.
KaneR. (2011a). Introduction: The contours of contemporary free-will debates (Pt. 2). In KaneR. (), The Oxford handbook of free will (2nd ed., pp. 3–35). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399691.003.0001
31.
KaneR. (), (2011b). The Oxford handbook of free will (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399691.001.0001
32.
KaneR. (2011c). Rethinking free will: A new perspective on an ancient problem. In KaneR. (), The Oxford handbook of free will (2nd ed., pp. 381–404). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399691.003.0019
33.
KaufmanJ. C., & SternbergR. J. (). (2010). Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511763205
34.
KériS. (2011). Solitary minds and social capital: Latent inhibition, general intellectual functions and social network size predict creative achievements. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 215–221. doi:10.1037/a0022000
35.
KingL. A., WalkerL. M., & BroylesS. J. (1996). Creativity and the five factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189–203. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1996.0013
36.
KrauszM., DuttonD., & BardsleyK. (). (2009). The idea of creativity (2nd ed.). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
LangleyP., SimonH. A., BradshawG. L., & ZythowJ. M. (1987). Scientific discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
LeungA. K., & ChiuC. (2008). Interactive effects of multicultural experiences and openness to experience on creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 376–382. doi:10.1080/10400410802391371
40.
LeungA. K., MadduxW. W., GalinskyA. D., & ChiuC. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63, 169–181. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.169
41.
MachE. (1896, January). On the part played by accident in invention and discovery. Monist, 6, 161–175. doi:10.5840/monist18966215
42.
MadduxW. W., AdamH., & GalinskyA. D. (2010). When in Rome . . . learn why the Romans do what they do: How multicultural learning experiences facilitate creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 731–741. doi:10.1177/0146167210367786
43.
MaierN. R. F. (1931). Reasoning in humans: II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 12, 181–194. doi:10.1037/h0071361
44.
MaierN. R. F. (1940). The behavioral mechanisms concerned with problem solving. Psychological Review, 47, 43–58. doi:10.1037/h0058466
45.
MartindaleC. (2009). Evolutionary models of innovation and creativity. In RickardsT., RuncoM., & MogerS. (), Routledge companion to creativity (pp. 109–118). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
46.
McCraeR. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258
47.
MednickS. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232. doi:10.1037/h0048850
48.
MeleA. R. (2008). Psychology and free will: A commentary. In BaerJ., KaufmanJ. C., & BaumeisterR. F. (), Are we free? Psychology and free will (pp. 325–346). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189636.003.0018
49.
MendelsohnG. A. (1976). Associative and attentional processes in creative performance. Journal of Personality, 44, 341–369. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1976.tb00127.x
50.
NicholsS. (2008). How can psychology contribute to the free will debate? In BaerJ., KaufmanJ. C., & BaumeisterR. F. (), Are we free? Psychology and free will (pp. 10–31). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189636.003.0002
51.
NicklesT. (2003). Evolutionary models of innovation and the Meno problem. In ShavininaL. V. (), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 54–78). New York, NY: Elsevier Science. doi:10.1016/B978-008044198-6/50006-1
52.
PaulE. S., & KaufmanS. B. (). (in press). Philosophy of creativity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
53.
PoincaréH. (1921). The foundations of science: Science and hypothesis, the value of science, science and method (HalsteadG. B.,). New York, NY: Science Press.
54.
PopperK. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London, UK: Routledge.
55.
ProctorR. A. (1993). Computer stimulated associations. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 391–400. doi:10.1080/10400419309534494
56.
RitterS. M., DamianR. I., SimontonD. K., van BaarenR. B., StrickM., DerksJ., & DijksterhuisA. (2012). Diversifying experiences enhance cognitive flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 961–964. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.009
57.
RothenbergA. (1986). Artistic creation as stimulated by superimposed versus combined-composite visual images. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 370–381. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.370
58.
SaadC. S., DamianR. I., Benet-MartinezV., MoonsW. G., & RobinsR. W. (in press). Multiculturalism and creativity: Effects of cultural context, bicultural identity, and cognitive fluency. Social Psychological and Personality Science. doi:10.1177/1948550612456560
59.
SeifertC. M., MeyerD. E., DavidsonN., PatalanoA. L., & YanivI. (1995). Demystification of cognitive insight: Opportunistic assimilation and the prepared-mind perspective. In SternbergR. J. & DavidsonJ. E. (), The nature of insight (pp. 65–124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60.
SimontonD. K. (1988). Scientific genius: A psychology of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61.
SimontonD. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.66
62.
SimontonD. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
63.
SimontonD. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, process, and person perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 475–494. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.475
64.
SimontonD. K. (2007). The creative imagination in Picasso's Guernica sketches: Monotonic improvements or nonmonotonic variants?Creativity Research Journal, 19, 329–344. doi:10.1080/10400410701753291
65.
SimontonD. K. (2008). Willing creation. In BaerJ., KaufmanJ. C., & BaumeisterR. F. (), Are we free? Psychology and free will (pp. 296–303). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189636.003.0015
66.
SimontonD. K. (2010). Creativity as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 156–179. doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2010.02.002
67.
SimontonD. K. (2011a). Creativity and discovery as blind variation and selective retention: Multiple-variant definitions and blind-sighted integration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 222–228. doi:10.1037/a0023144
68.
SimontonD. K. (2011b). Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell's (1960). BVSR model after the half-century mark. Review of General Psychology, 15, 158–174. doi:10.1037/a0022912
69.
SimontonD. K. (2011c). Debating the BVSR theory of creativity: Comments on Dasgupta (2011) and Gabora (2011). Creativity Research Journal, 23, 381–387. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.621861
70.
SimontonD. K. (2012a). Combinatorial creativity and sightedness: Monte Carlo simulations using three-criterion definitions. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 22, 5–17.
71.
SimontonD. K. (2012b). Creativity, problem solving, and solution set sightedness: Radically reformulating BVSR. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 48–65. doi:10.1002/jocb.004
72.
SimontonD. K. (2012c). Taking the US Patent Office creativity criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 97–106.
73.
SimontonD. K. (2013a). Creative problem solving as sequential BVSR: Exploration (total ignorance) versus elimination (informed guess). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.12.001
74.
SimontonD. K. (2013b). Creative thought as blind variation and selective retention: Why sightedness is inversely related to creativity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0030705
75.
SimontonD. K. (2013c). What is a creative idea? Little-c versus Big-C creativity. In ChanJ. & ThomasK. (), Handbook of research on creativity. Cheltenham Glos, UK: Edward Elgar.
76.
SimontonD. K., & DamianR. I. (2013). Creativity. In ReisbergD. (), Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 795–807). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
77.
SoberE. (1992). Models of cultural evolution. In GriffithsP. (), Trees of life: Essays in philosophy of biology (pp. 17–39). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
78.
StavridouA., & FurnhamA. (1996). The relationship between psychoticism, trait-creativity and the attentional mechanism of cognitive inhibition. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 143–153. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(96)00030-X
79.
SternbergR. J. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in human creativity: Is variation blind or sighted?The Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 159–176. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1998.tb00813.x
80.
ThagardP. (2012). Creative combination of representations: Scientific discovery and technological invention. In ProctorR. & CapaldiE. J. (), Psychology of science: Implicit and explicit processes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199753628.003.0016
81.
ThagardP., & StewartT. C. (2011). The AHA! experience: Creativity through emergent binding in neural networks. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 35, 1–33.
82.
ToulminS. (1972). Human understanding: The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
83.
VohsK., ReddenJ., & RahinelR. (in press). Physical order produces healthy choices, generosity, conventionality, whereas disorder produces creativity. Psychological Science.
84.
WanW. W. N., & ChiuC.-Y. (2002). Effects of novel conceptual combination on creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 227–240. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2002.tb01066.x
