Two survey investigations conducted over a 2-year period serve as a case study illustrating how research that crosses disciplinary boundaries can shed light on current conceptual and methodological issues in student retention. Specifically, we applied the concepts of organizational commitment and job embeddedness used by industrial/organizational psychologists in the study of employee turnover to an investigation of factors that influence college student retention and withdrawal. The present research models the cross-disciplinary approach by examining the associations between embeddedness (including links, fit, sacrifice) and organizational commitment, and focusing on their ability to predict students' intentions to leave and, longitudinally, to predict actual departure prior to graduation. The case study demonstrates how understanding a particular behavior in one domain, that of education, is advanced by taking an approach from outside that discipline. Similarly, concepts from I/O psychology and management become clarified when applied outside their own boundaries.
AjzenI. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In KuhlJ. & BeckmanJ. (), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
2.
AjzenI., & FishbeinM. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
AjzenI., & FishbeinM. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In AlbarracínD., JohnsonB. T., & ZannaM. P. (), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
AllenN. J., & MeyerJ. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18. doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
5.
ArminioJ., & LoflinS. E. (2003). The impact of involvement on students at various points in their college careers. In SkipperT. L. & ArgoR. (), Involvement in campus activities and the retention of first-year college students (Monograph No. 36) (pp. 35–50). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.
6.
AstinA. W. (1975). Preventing students from dropping out. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
BakkerA. B. (2011). An evidence-based model of work engagement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 265–269. doi:10.1177/0963721411414534
8.
BarryC. Y. H., & OkunM. A. (2011). Application of investment theory to predicting maintenance of the intent to stay among freshmen. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 13, 87–107.
9.
BeanJ. (1983). The application of a model of turnover in work organizations to the student attrition process. Review of Higher Education, 6, 129–148.
10.
BozemanD., & PerrewéP. (2001). The effect of item content overlap on Organizational Commitment Questionnaire turnover cognitions relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 161–173. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.161
11.
BreweE., KramerL., & O'BrienG. (2009). Investigating student communities with network analysis of interactions in a physics learning center. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1179, 105–108. doi:10.1063/1.3266688
12.
CabreraA. F., CastañedaM. B., NoraA., & HengstlerD. (1992). The convergence between two theories of college persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 63, 143–164. doi:10.2307/1982157
13.
CabreraA. F., NoraA., & CastañedaM. B. (1993). College persistence: Structural equations modeling test of an integrated model of student retention. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 123–139. doi:10.2307/2960026
14.
CacioppoJ. T., von HippelW., & ErnstJ. M. (1997). Mapping cognitive structures and processes through verbal content: The thought-listing technique. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 928–940. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.65.6.928
15.
CohenA. (1993). Organizational commitment and turnover: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1140–1157. doi.org/10.2307/256650
16.
CohenS., & WillsT. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
17.
CrossleyC., BennettR., JexS., & BurnfieldJ. (2007). Development of a global measure of job embeddedness and integration into a traditional model of voluntary turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1031–1042. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1031
18.
CutronaC. E., ColeV., ColangeloN., AssoulineS. G., & RussellD. W. (1994). Perceived parental social support and academic achievement: An attachment theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 369–378. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.369
19.
DolbierC., & SteinhardtM. (2000). The development and validation of the Sense of Support Scale. Behavioral Medicine, 25, 169–180. doi:10.1080/08964280009595746
20.
EcclesJ., AdlerT. F., FuttermanR., GoffS. B., KaczalaC. M., MeeceJ., & MidgleyC. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In SpenceJ. T. (), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
21.
EisenbergerR., FasoloP., & Davis-LaMastroV. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51–59. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.1.51
22.
FarrellD., & RusbultC. E. (1981). Exchange variables as predictors of job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover: The impact of rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27, 78–95.
23.
FinnJ. D., SurianiA. E., & AchillesC. M. (2010). Small classes in the early grades: One policy, multiple outcomes. In ReynoldsA. J., RolnickA. J., EnglundM. M., & TempleJ. A. (), Childhood programs and practices in the first decade of life (pp. 287–308). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24.
FinnJ. D., & ZimmerK. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In ChristensonS. L., ReschlyA. L., & WylieC. (), The handbook on student engagement (pp. 97–132). New York, NY: Springer Science.
25.
FishbeinM., & AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
26.
GriffethR. W., HomP. W., & GaertnerS. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Updated moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463–488. doi:10.1177/014920630002600305
27.
HalbeslebenJ. R. B., & WheelerA. R. (2008). The relative roles of engagement and embeddedness in predicting job performance and intention to leave. Work & Stress, 22, 242–256. doi:10.1080/02678370802383962
28.
HarmanW. S., LeeT. W., MitchellT. R., FelpsW., & OwensB. P. (2007). The psychology of voluntary employee turnover. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 51–54. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00474.x
29.
HeitzmannC. A., & KaplanR. M. (1988). Assessment of Methods for Measuring Social Support. Health Psychology, 7, 75–109.
30.
HerzogS. (2006). Estimating student retention and degree-completion time: Decision trees and neural networks vis-à-vis regression. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2006, 17–33. doi:10.1002/ir.185
31.
HoltomB. C., & InderriedenE. J. (2006). Integrating the unfolding model and job embeddedness model to better understand voluntary turnover. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18, 435–452.
32.
HoltomB. C., MitchellT. R., & LeeT. W. (2006). Increasing human and social capital by applying job embeddedness theory. Organizational Dynamics, 35, 316–331.
33.
HomP. W., & GriffethR. W. (1995). Employee turnover. Cincinnati, OH: South/Western.
34.
HuselidM. A., & DayN. E. (1991). Organizational commitment, job involvement, and turnover: A substantive and methodological analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 380–391. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.3.380
35.
LarkinJ. E., PinesH. A., BraselA., & KionkeK. (2008, May). Freshmen-sophomore differences in institutional attachment and retention. Poster session presented at 20th annual convention of the Association for Psychological Science, Chicago, IL.
36.
LeB., & AgnewC. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37–57.
37.
LeeT. W., MitchellT. R., SablynskiC. J., BurtonJ. P., & HoltomB. C. (2004). The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 711–722. doi:10.2307/20159613
38.
MaertzC. P., & CampionM. A. (1998). 25 years of voluntary turnover research: A review and critique. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 13, 49–83.
39.
MathieuJ., & ZajacD. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171–194. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171
40.
MeyerJ. P., & AllenN. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 74, 152–156. doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
41.
MeyerJ. P., & AllenN. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
MitchellT., HoltomB., LeeT., SablynskiC., & ErezM. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1102–1121. doi:10.2307/3069391
43.
MobleyW. H., GriffethR. W., HandH. H., & MeglinoB. M. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 493–522. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.493
44.
MowdayR. T., SteersR. M., & PorterL. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1
45.
MuiY. Q., & KhimmS. (2012, May 28). College dropouts have debt but no degree. Washington Post. Retrieved fromhttp://www.washingtonpost.com
46.
NorrisF., & KaniastyK. (1996). Received and perceived social support in times of stress: A test of the social support deterioration deterrence model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 498–511. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.498
47.
PanW., GuoS., AlikonisC., & BaiH. (2008). Do intervention programs assist students to succeed in college? A multilevel longitudinal study. College Student Journal, 42, 90–97.
48.
PascarellaE. T., & TerenziniP. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
49.
PleskacT. J., KeeneyJ., MerrittS. M., SchmittN., & OswaldF. L. (2011). A detection model of college withdrawal. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 85–98. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.12.001
50.
PriceJ. L. (1977). The study of turnover. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
51.
PriceJ. L., & MuellerC. W. (1981). A causal model of turnover for nurses. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 543–565. doi:10.2307/255574
52.
RiceR. W., GentileD. A., & MacFarlinD. B. (1991). Facet importance and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 31–39. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.1.31
53.
RivasR. M., SauerP. L., GlynnJ. G., & MillerT. E. (2007). Persist/dropout differences in pre-matriculation attitudes of freshman towards college attrition: A longitudinal multiple group structural equations model. College Teaching Methods & Styles, 3, 55–64. Retrieved fromhttp://journals.cluteonline.com/index.php/CTMS/article/view/5288/5373
54.
RobbinsS., LauverK., LeH., DavisD., LangleyR., & CarlstromA. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261–288. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261
55.
RusbultC. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.
56.
RusbultC. E., & FarrellD. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The impact on job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover of variations in rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 429–438.
57.
RusbultC. E., MartzJ. M., & AgnewC. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391.
58.
SarasonI. G., PierceG. R., & SarasonB. R. (1990). A brief measure of social support: Practical and theoretical implications. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 497–510. doi:10.1177/0265407587044007
59.
SelingoJ. (2012, March 2). The rise and fall of the graduation rate. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved fromhttp://chronicle.com
60.
Solberg NesL., EvansD. R., & SegerstromS. C. (2009). Optimism and college retention: Mediation by motivation, performance, and adjustment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 1887–1912. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00508.x
61.
TettR. P., & MeyerJ. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46, 259–293. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x
62.
TintoV. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89–125. doi:10.2307/1170024
63.
TintoV. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
64.
TintoV. (2012). Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
65.
ViswesvaranC., SanchezJ. I., & FisherJ. (1999). The role of social support in the process of work stress: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 314–334. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1998.1661
66.
VoelklK. E. (2012). School identification. In ChristensenS. L., ReschlyA. L., & WylieC. (), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 193–218). New York, NY: Springer Science.
67.
WeidmanJ. (1989). Undergraduate socialization: A conceptual approach. In SmartJ. (), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 5, pp. 289–322). New York, NY: Agathon.
